Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma (play)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 01:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete N/N play by a N/N writer. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Howard Zinn is non-notable? Uncle G (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Highly, lul. but do we really need an article for this play? there is already a more expansive plot summary in Zinn's own page. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as the author is clearly notable. There are also sources to provide reliable and verifiable information about the play. I've added two such sources, and expanded the synopsis to refer to the actual Emma Goldman, upon whose life the play is based. There's probably more out there, but this is, I think, a servicable stub, and should be kept. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 04:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We could easily incorporate this into Zimm's article, additions would amount to probably no more than 100 characters. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What you're suggesting is a merge, which does not require deletion tools. (Though I think an independent article is justified here.) Zagalejo^^^ 07:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- We could easily incorporate this into Zimm's article, additions would amount to probably no more than 100 characters. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 04:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, there seem to be just enough sources for an article per WP:BK. If there is a more expansive plot summary in another article, that suggests that the text is in the wrong article. --Dhartung | Talk 06:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.