Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essia Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:36, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Essia Health

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ADMASQ with references that are excellent PR and detail the process of being a medical scribe awfully well, but nothing is really about the org. I'm about to remove the AFC banners. The article may have them, but has not been reviewed and accepted, so it must take its chance as any draft article moved to main namespace. Fiddle Faddle 08:41, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So what should I add to the article that I missed? What kind of info are you talking about for the org? Let me know and I will make the changes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigbark (talk • contribs) 18:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. If these can be added then the issue changes and, potentially, vanishes. Fiddle Faddle 18:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Craigbark (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)thanks got it[reply]

Not sure. It has some references, but I am not sure they are sufficient to establish real notability.BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 08:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC) --Craigbark (talk) 23:52, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Has a decent amount of medical journals so I thought it was pretty notable based on the Journals I found and the legitimate news outlets that have published articles. I just made some changes let me know what you think. Thanks Craig[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Trivial references. Some are straight press releases, others are advertorials. DGG ( talk ) 04:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. News that's actually about the company is press releases, routine reports of management changes etc. Daily News and Statesman-Journal pieces are about scribes in general. Doesn't meet GNG. Brianhe (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Craigbark (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Got you, let me work on it a little more, haven't had any hobby time lately. Thanks for the feedback..[reply]

Delete I could not find any indicator of real notability, looks somewhat promotional.Jeppiz (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.