Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faith in London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Faith in London

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet GNG. Sources in article are related to the producer, and a brief mention in RSes as a runner-up in the young segment of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation Faith Shorts award. Not much more found in BEFORE. Icewhiz (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Despite the claims in the article, I really can't find evidence that this really passes NFILM. Many of the sources listed are in passing and some aren't in places that would be considered reliable. The article also has a definite promotional tone to it, so I'm curious to know whether there was some undisclosed paid editing going on here since many of the articles created by the same editor have the same issue, some of which are more promotional sounding. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:46, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ReaderofthePack: my suspicion (after reviewing non-deleted articles in the creator's creation list up to #200) is that they were creating articles on British-Bengali people of some minor community note (both in the London area, and in the north, e.g. Birmingham) - using various British-Bengali lists. I'm not sure of a COI here (unless promoting British-Bengali people is COI) - but there are copyvio concerns (which got the creator indef blocked). On film makers, singers, dangers, etc. they also created an article for several of the works (e.g. - in this case - look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Elephant in the Room (film) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tariq Chow. For Hannan Majid - they created the small production company they own - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Collective - and every documentary they produced. I suspect there is more nomination to do (I'm still going to review the ones under 200) - in some cases I didn't nominate what I though was borderline, and I avoided singers/songwriters all together (in some cases - with multiple articles for singles) - since I'm less versed in song notability.Icewhiz (talk) 15:10, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a bit of a relief if this is just a case of over-exuberance as opposed to him being say, a freelancer or marketing person working for a local agency. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFILM. I can't source it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.