Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexAccount (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Nationwide Building Society. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- FlexAccount (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Product does not appear notable. Maybe merge into a corporate wiki per Wikipedia:PRODUCT#Products_and_services if the company is notable in itself TrulyBlue (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC) TrulyBlue (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This article is spam. There is nothing there except to promote the company and its product. LittleOldMe (talk) 13:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-consumer accounting software with not even a minimal showing of importance. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:56, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Nationwide Building Society. There's a very notable thing called a FlexAccount, which this article doesn't mention, and which per WP:BEFORE, the nominator should really have found out about.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 16:22, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I did know about the banking account, but didn't consider it notable. It gets one mention in the Nationwide Building Society wiki, and came up when I searched for the term, but I thought that I'd stick to the subject of this wiki. TrulyBlue (talk) 11:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per S Marshall's comments above, but Move the material somewhere, possibly to FlexSystem Limited. This source: [1] describes FlexSystem Limited as "one of the leading enterprise software solution providers in China". There are other sources, although not public access: [2] and [3] for the company, although I only find a single article mentioning this product: [4]. I don't think the product is notable but I think the company (barely) is. Cazort (talk) 16:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Nationwide Building Society as suggested by S Marshall. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.