Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom! (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:47, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom! (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Cited ref is a press release, and I can't find any independent sources. —teb728 t c 18:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NCORP. I can't find independent, reliable sources to stand up the claims in the article. Just Chilling (talk) 22:26, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 23:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG I can only find a single independent source (PR Newswire) but I don't view a single treating of the subject substantial. Bryce Carmony (talk) 12:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's even worse than that; the PR Newswire report is simply a reprint of a company press release and doesn't contain any creative editorial content so I would argue that it is not an independent source. Just Chilling (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There you have it, and the yahoo finance is just aggregated on the PR newswire so really there isn't anything in the way of secondary source. Bryce Carmony (talk) 20:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.