Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geektime (blog)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geektime

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weak sources do not demonstrate WP:CORP notability. The claim that it is "largest technology blog in Israel" is simply a quip from the lead-in to a piece written by some Geektime writers about another company. Another source is describing the company in passing in the context of an event they hosted. The third and final source is likewise in-passing mention of the source of a story involving Microsoft and Apple. Brianhe (talk) 11:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find any third party coverage. Considered a redirect to Moran Bar, but there's no sources available for that either and no article. Probably WP:TOOSOON.--Jahaza (talk) 15:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ORG. Wikipedia is WP:NOTDIRECTORY for just listing a company. Jytdog (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:NORG. There are many articles by the site but no significant coverage about the site. Jbh ^Talk 21:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete also as none of this is better convincing of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 03:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I just want to add that there are a number of editors here who harangued the creator of this article enough to prevent them from even wanting to show up here. --MurderByDeletionism^"bang!" 01:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: just another blog; fails GNG. Jonathunder (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.