Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Géant Casino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. needs cleanup, but appears notable. AfD is not cleanup... Tawker (talk) 06:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Géant Casino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject might be notable, however no sources are cited and I had a lot of trouble finding anything that would pass RS in a Google search. The article has been tagged for no references for two years. Despite numerous edits no one seems interested in adding sources. The wording and overall tone of the article seems highly promotional. As it stands the article fails V and NPOV. The former might be fixable if someone knows French and can check out French language sources. The latter I suspect is probably not without more trouble than it's worth. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The continued lack of references is a problem and is clearly a task for someone to undertake, but this is one of the major supermarket retails chains of France. A Google search might not be much good unless done on google.fr. The company's own website is a good starting point. The most recent references I can find are to a a strike by 50 staff at the Béziers branch last month and France Info reporting this month that the group is the second cheapest chain in France. Emeraude (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, agree with analysis done by Emeraude (talk · contribs), above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.