Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenwood Avenue (North Carolina)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Glenwood South‎. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glenwood Avenue (North Carolina)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is for a moderately utilized surface arterial in Raleigh, North Carolina. No sources indicating significance, article barely long enough to be a stub, plus discrepancy between the article's title and its content. Suggesting either deletion or redirecting to U.S. Route 70 in North Carolina. MikeM2011 (talk) 15:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. MikeM2011 (talk) 15:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Shopping malls, Geography, and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The title should be moved to Glenwood South, the name of the neighborhood, rather than the street name. If The New York Times writes about a neighbourhood, https://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/12/travel/old-neighborhood-new-sounds.html , the neighborhood is probably notable. I added some other references as well. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:28, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to Glenwood South per Eastmain, I also found this source that discusses the district.

"Experience 24 hours on Glenwood South, the Raleigh district with the raucous reputation". The News & Observer.

Jumpytoo Talk 02:49, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move per above. Agreed the avenue itself would be a delete-able article, this is a valid article on a wrong topic. SportingFlyer T·C 03:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.