Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Sam Club (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. 17 relevent sources found so meets GNG (I don't usually close on 1 keep but even after a week relisting it would still be the same result/outcome.) (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Good Sam Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was speedied by me following a CSD nom, but it was pointed out that there had been an afd to keep nine years ago. Given that the current text bears little resemblance to that version, I suggest that the largely uncited article is basically a self-serving advertisement and should now go Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Passes WP:GNG per news and book sources. Source examples include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11] (subscription required). Some of the book sources contain information about the organization that is short in nature, but beyond passing mentions. Source examples: [12] (pp. 246-247), [13] (pp. 151-152), [14], [15], [16], [17]. NorthAmerica1000 15:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.