Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/György Pazdera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pokolgép. ♠PMC(talk) 03:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

György Pazdera[edit]

György Pazdera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this article for notability on the grounds that this article doesn't contain any sources despite the fact that this is an article on a living person. Also, the article is on the level of what we call a "sub-stub" on huwiki (I believe that was a thing around here too). A short introduction about him and a short blurb (misleadingly cited as a "source" - this is not a source) about him becoming 50 years old in 2007. According to that blurb, this was released on the official site of the band, so it's not independent. Couldn't find anything reliable, only trivial mentions and databases. The only thing that comes close to a reliable source is this interview from 2014 in Hammer World (Metal Hammer). Still, this is just one good source and one is not enough. He doesn't have an article on the Hungarian Wikipedia either, even though we have a lots of articles connected to Pokolgép. Unnotable musician. Pokolgép is a notable band (although I have noticed that there have been an Afd here back in 2017), but not everyone who was ever part of the band is notable.GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Encyclopaedia Metallum is not a reliable source anyways. So if interviews are not necessarily reliable, then I can cross out that one as well, and we are left with no reliable sources whatsoever. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.