Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gyaldem Tish

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. – bradv^🍁 23:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gyaldem Tish

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is an WP:ADMASQ seems to be connected to an undisclosed COI due to the nature of the article. Secondly, the subject of the article doesn’t fulfill any criterion from WP:MUSICBIO nor do they satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. Finally, a review of all the sources used in the article shows they are very much unreliable and are promotional. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Ampimd (talk) 16:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.