Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Mohammad Idris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Mohammad Idris[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Indian singer that fails WP:NMUSICBIO. Also appears to be a promo piece with the author uses words like "acclaimed", well-known, top-graded etc Claim to have been added to Limca Book of Records with no sources to support.

Generally everything is sketchy about this subject from WP:RS to WP:N . TheChronium (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. TheChronium (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. TheChronium (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. TheChronium (talk) 09:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Puff piece that's been rejected at AfC five times already. I think six tries is enough, don't you? - Sumanuil (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Pretty new to Wikipedia editing, and this article came up in editing suggestions for articles whose copywriting could be improved, but I agree that it should probably be deleted (as the singer is not notable.) What's the process for this; is everything discussed as edits *to this page*? How are comments signed?

Thanks, Quicklibrary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quicklibrary (talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

testing signing a comment; Quicklibrary (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: before search result returned negative. This topic is far below general notability guideline. Kaspadoo (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.