Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human legitimacy principle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I appreciate the author's stated understanding of our notability guideline. Unfortunately, this article does not appear to meet it. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 15:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Human legitimacy principle

This is a promotional article for a non-notable group that is pushing a non-notable philosophy. The term "Human legitimacy principle" has only 80 ghits, most of which are either The Human Union website or online bookstores. This appears to be a recently invented concept which is espoused by a group of 40 largely non-notable individuals and very few other people. Fails WP:N and WP:SOAPBOX. andy (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. —andy (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that the human legitimacy principle might not satisfy the WP:N since it has not widely circulated or being accepted in the academic community or among political organizations. I am not familiar enough with Wikipedia's policy regarding notability to make a strong argument. The article was written to reference what I believed to be a sound concept, and in a manner not to present it falsely as notable. If strict notability is required, I will concur with deletion without further discussion.

Jllortega (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no independent source to establish notability.--Boffob (talk) 19:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete seems self written, references only a single source, not notable, looks like an orphaned article.... the list to delete this goes on and on —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs) 07:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable concept, WP:FRINGE, borderline WP:OR, no independent sources. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to indicate that author Lyndon Storey, or the book, is notable. Mandsford (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.