Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Steinberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Steinberg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article is mentioned in a few mid-1980s news articles (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), but appears to fail WP:GNG and the requirements at WP:BLP. Furthermore, this article appears to be WP:COATRACK for LaRouche movement in that it seems to exist only to showcase the subject's "Selected publications" on a variety of fringe topics in Executive Intelligence Review. (Related to this, see the LaRouche-related topics in Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests.) Location (talk) 19:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Businesspeople. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Just took a quick look. Looks like zero GNG type sources and as a result near zero content about him. Bulk of the content is list of essays. North8000 (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looking for independent reliable sources about Steinberg is frustrating. There are a lot of other Jeffrey Steinbergs who show up, and those hits that I can be reasonably sure are about this Steinberg are not independent, or merely mention him in passing. I cleaned up the bad sourcing in the article, which left almost nothing sourced to an independent, reliable source. - Donald Albury 20:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Like DA above, I am unable to find significant coverage of this person in independent, reliable secondary sources, so they seem to fail notability guidelines. Their "essays" in Executive Intelligence Review are also not notable; listing them serves only as a weird, promotional effort for the LaRouche movement. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.