Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jendrik Sigwart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest 2021. Obviously this isn’t likely to stand long and the bar for undoing and working in the article is very low. Spartaz Humbug! 08:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jendrik Sigwart[edit]

Jendrik Sigwart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No single source cited. Reads like a line of advert. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 06:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Jenyire2 06:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:20, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No such precedent has ever been set. Every AfD on Eurovision performers has however set the precedent that being your countries representative at ESC is notable.BabbaQ (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You cited WP:NMUSIC #10 and #12, however both are past tense: has been and has performed. Can you provide some AfD examples for future entrant articles that were kept to support your stated precedent? I've personally only seen AfDs after they've participated and for which you rightfully point out that many are kept. I'm uncomfortable with the idea of having an article for someone who may be notable in the future, but isn't yet. Grk1011 (talk) 23:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.