Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José A. Teixeira (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources that exist do not meet our requirements. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:24, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

José A. Teixeira

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject does not meet WP:BASIC. Coverage found in searches for independent, reliable sources is limited to name checks, short passing mentions and quotations from the subject, which do not establish notability. The primary sources in the article and found in searches also do not establish notability. Below is an analysis of sources in the article; source searches are not providing anything better:

References

Ref 1 – Primary source published by the LDS church
Refs 2–7 – Primary source published by Church News, which is owned by the LDS church
Ref 8 – Has two name checks for the subject. Not significant coverage.
Listed source 1 – Primary source published by Liahona, which is owned by the LDS church
Listed source 2 – Primary source, Church News, owned by the LDS church

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources are internal to the church, not substantive coverage from third-party sources, so notability is not established. Reywas92^Talk 20:49, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a renomination less than 3 months after the last one closed. He has coverage fcrom countries other than where he is a native of, this is over nomination.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources and passing mentions do not confer notability. WP:BEFORE searches have provided no better. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Community consensus is that LDS leaders have to pass WP:GNG (see discussions in 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2018). Other than a single minimal mention used to verify a date (Deseret News), sources currently in article are not independent under WP:IIS (Church News, Liahona, lds.org) and do not count toward establishing notability. Search does not find WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources, only the usual passing mentions in event announcements and brief quotes reprinted from church sources. Some LDS leaders are notable, but this one does not pass WP:GNG. Open to reconsideration if significant coverage in independent sources emerges. Bakazaka (talk) 02:50, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.