Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Camacho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:12, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Camacho

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article of no clear notability. Does not meet WP:MANOTE or WP:GNG see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Imamura).PRehse (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 12:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is nothing in the article that makes a real case for notability. There's a lack of significant independent coverage and nothing to show he meets any of the notability criteria for martial artists. The only notability claim appears to be his martial arts rank, but that has never been considered sufficient to show notability. Claims like his "work reached a different level since he became the teacher of teachers" are unsupported puffery. Being a student of Leo Imamura, whose article was recently deleted, is also is not a reason to claim notability. Papaursa (talk) 12:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough evidence from sources to indicate significant notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.