Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katarzyna Pikulska

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. There doesn't seem to be agreement that the sources presented show a fully developed article can be written. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:59, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Katarzyna Pikulska (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In sources Pikulska is often only listed. She is not a main character of quoted articles. Many sources only include her among other activists. IMO, there is no notability The Wolak (talk) 11:45, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rzeczpospolita is one of Poland's two newspapers of record. Of course, being the subject of misinformation by a major government media organisation - (Telewizja Polska in the case of this particular country) - is often evidence that someone is a notable dissident. Boud (talk) 22:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC) (clarify Boud (talk) 07:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC))[reply]
For a few arbitrary sources not (yet) used in the article, see Onet or Newsweek or Termedia (Termedia [pl] - a Polish medical publisher). Boud (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Which of these sources meet SIGCOV for her? Ie. which of them mention her in more than just passing? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please look at the sources, there are paragraphs full of material about her to satisfy the GNG: Lekarka skarży wojewodę i ministra zdrowia. Bo wybory korespondencyjne to zagrożenie, Nie złamał jej hejt TVP. Kim jest młoda lekarka, która walczy z Szumowskim?, Kłamstwa na temat Katarzyny Pikulskiej, Katarzyna Pikulska: Dymisja rządu albo strajk generalny. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 23:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, there is no indication of the lasting notability Marcelus (talk) 09:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:NBASIC: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Just to take one of the many articles that are fully devoted as interviews with Pikulska: Katarzyna Pikulska: Infection statistics are misleading:
    1. Pikulska's name is in the title of the article;
    2. Pikulska's photo heads the top of the article;
    3. Rzeczpospolita is one of Poland's two newspapers of record;
    4. the entire article is an interview with Pikulska, with the interviewer's questions each followed by Pikulska's opinions.
    @The Wolak, Piotrus, and Marcelus: In what sense is this April 2020 article on COVID-19 pandemic related issues not significantly presenting Pikulska as a sociopolitically relevant person in Poland for events prior to the November 2020 protests? Is Rzeczpospolita controlled by Pikulska (e.g. she funds it, she owns it - please provide sources)? The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the dominating socio-political issues in April 2020.
    @The Wolak: Do you still claim that Pikulska is not a main character of this Rzeczpospolita article?
    @Piotrus: Do you still claim that Pikulska is just given a passing mention in this article?
    Keep in mind that in an AfD, you are expected to look at the existing sources, and look for other sources. Boud (talk) 21:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. The interview is with her, not about her. It does little to estabilish her notability. She can have a Wikipedia article about her when independent, reliable sources cover her life and activities, not just ask her to speak about Polish medicine/politics/etc. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep multiyear appearances, subject of state-media smear, recognised leader of doctors' struggle, satisfies BASIC/GNG.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Rutkiewicz, Paweł (22 April 2020). "Lekarka skarży wojewodę i ministra zdrowia. Bo wybory korespondencyjne to zagrożenie". warszawa.wyborcza.pl (in Polish).
  2. ^ Żądło, Agnieszka (1 May 2020). "Nie złamał jej hejt TVP. Kim jest młoda lekarka, która walczy z Szumowskim?". Newsweek (in Polish). Dwa lata temu stała się twarzą głodówki lekarzy rezydentów. Telewizja Polska zrobiła z niej wtedy pławiącą się w luksusach podróżniczkę. Teraz znów jest o niej głośno, bo ortopeda Katarzyna Pikulska oskarża ministra zdrowia Łukasza Szumowskiego i wojewodę mazowieckiego Konstantego Radziwiłła o złamanie kodeksu etyki lekarskiej.
  3. ^ "Protest głodowy Męczennicy sprawy". biennalewarszawa.pl (in Polish). Katarzyna Pikulska – lekarka, uczestniczka misji medycznych m.in. w Kurdystanie i Tanzanii, brała udział w ubiegłorocznym proteście głodowym lekarzy rezydentów.
  4. ^ Mierzynska, Anna (20 January 2023). "Pereira, Świrski i Nisztor mają uczyć o dezinformacji. Chociaż nie o tym, jak ją robić". oko.press (in Polish). Manipulacje TVP wzbudziły oburzenie. Ostatecznie Samuel Pereira przeprosił Katarzynę Pikulską i poinformował, że autor materiału o rezydentach został zawieszony.
Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 01:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first two are reasonably reliable, but SIGCOV and ONEVENT are an issue. There are two-three paragraphs about her. It's a start but IMHO it is not enough yet. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:56, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 19:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.