Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kapouti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kapouti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What is this supposed to be? It has six different cleanup tags up front yet seems to not have been fundamentally changed for more than a year. Does it exist or was it destroyed by this Turkish invasion? I have no clue. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 22:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Looks like a machine translation. Move to Wikipedia:Article Incubator? It's difficult to judge notability in the article's present state. --Northernhenge (talk) 22:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Arggh Keep English sources from Google books tells me that this is a real ancient village in Cyprus that also goes by the name Kalo Chorio. A website even tells us that there has been selective destruction and preservation of cultural heritage in Kapouti. The problem is that the English sources don't provide enough information to draft an article! I've notified WP Cyprus, I hope that they could assist in providing non-English sources. --Lenticel ^(talk) 05:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep not pretty, but that's not the standard of keeping or deleting. Real place=gets kept. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but change title to Kalo Chorio. There are sources, it is a real geographic place, it should be kept, as ugly as it is. First Light (talk) 02:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.