Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LADAMA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Assuming Richard3210's comment is an equivalence of keep... (non-admin closure) Lourdes 16:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LADAMA

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Sources located do not satisfy the requirements of reliability, independence and significance. The editor whose username is Z0 14:49, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've had this page on my watchlist for the last month, trying to decide whether it passes notability, and I think it might do - obviously the best sources in the article are the ones from public broadcasters (NPR, WNYC, WBUR), but I assume these count as reliable sources. There's also this article from Colombia's El Espectador newspaper [1], which is definitely an RS as one of the country's leading newspapers. Clearly most of the section on band members needs to go as it's sourced to the band's website or other non-RS, but I think a basic stub might pass WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Richard3120 (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. NPR coverage: album review, of the song "Porro Maracatu", review of new single "Confesión"; interview (pp. 28–31) in Tom Tom Magazine; WBUR-FM piece; video review in Folk Radio UK;coverage in El Diario La Prensa, and plenty of smaller items in reliable sources. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 17:54, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:21, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The in-depth coverage indicated by Hobbes Goodyear shows this band easily passing WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. --Oakshade (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.