Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lake Placid 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Canley (talk) 07:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Placid 2

Delete unsourced article about a movie that has no demonstrable notability, see WP:FILM Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A quick Google search turns up enough for sources (though being unreferenced is NOT a reason for deletion), which I have added. I have also expanded the stub a bit, better fleshing out notability. The sources that I used also provide reasonable information for a plot summary, but that can be added later. LaMenta3 (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — while I appreciate the vigilance, I believe the nomination is a bit hasty given that the article has existed for three days. LaMenta3 appears to have begun addressing concerns about sourcing this film. As for notability, I don't think one can question its distribution (both over the Sci Fi Channel and on DVD) and it has been reviewed by both Variety Daily and TV Guide (at least), which should be sufficient for a TV-movie-turned-DVD-release (per WP:NF). D. Brodale (talk) 00:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article needs work but it is notable and meets the requirements for a film being listing. Collectonian (talk) 06:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I agree with the notability based on broadcasting on TV and the review in notable magazines. --Ubardak (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Collectonian (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Collectonian (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep due to the notability clearly being established. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.