Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of charity songs for Hurricane Katrina relief

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Article needs to be moved to a better title and needs cleanup, but that is not for AfD to discuss/decide. Merge as suggested by Colapeninsula is also an option, but that is also something that can be decided on the article's talk page. Randykitty (talk) 18:12, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of charity songs for Hurricane Katrina relief (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indiscriminate crufty bollocks. Launchballer 08:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I call that indiscriminate per WP:DISCRIMINATE because it just looks like a random list of songs pertaining to Hurricane Katrina. Some of them don't even have articles!--Launchballer 12:24, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Actually this is quite a good list-article topic and/or a category. Per the guideline wp:CLT, categories and lists and navigation templates are mutually supportive. I expect that sources will exist clearly to support the individual items, and the topic of the category also. I see no assertion of wp:BEFORE being met; the nom is merely, well, an ass-ertion of bollocks.... :) --doncram 01:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per doncram. A better title would be nice, but I can't think of one. I am One of Many (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above - Non notable cruft shite. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 16:59, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I don't see any of the references (such as some of them are) mentioning the charity aspect at all. Only one or two even make the unsourced claim. They're all works about the disaster. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes I think it should be renamed to List of Hurricane Katrina-themed songs or similar, as I agree it is not documented that origianlly listed songs or those added by my contributions are actually charity songs. It is a notable topic, though, with numerous sources about the set of songs, IMHO. About a Requested Move that is for Talk page discussion, not AFD. --doncram 03:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Searching within Wikipedia on "List of songs about" brings me to a lot of similar list-articles, e.g. List of songs about the Vietnam War, and many more, generally within Category:Lists of songs about a topic (category which I just added to the list-article). This is a fine list-article topic, there are enough songs to make a substantial list, and there is coverage specifically on the topic of songs about Katrina. I voted "Keep" further above, already. --doncram 23:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Inherently biased. Implies the ol' "appeal to pathos" and Wikipedia is not soapbox or means of promotion. --Mr. Guye (talk) 02:20, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete A large percentage of songs are unreferenced, the songs listed as being critical of the response could potentially be considered libelious if no reference has been cited to back up this claim. Amortias (T)(C) 20:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A notable event that has a large amount of songs written about/for it. Article needs work, but that's not a reason to delete. Could also use a better title, as someone stated above. — Status (talk · contribs) 22:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.