Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of churches in Edmonton, Alberta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 03:18, December 1, 2007

List of churches in Edmonton, Alberta

Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor a directory. --Ichabod (talk) 20:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note This AfD is part of a series of AfDs made by the nominator that specifically targets lists of churches across the United States. The AfDs currently include this, this and this • Freechild'sup? 15:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a directory. JJL (talk) 21:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This kind of information is better suited for a 411-type site. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 22:27, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 13:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a comprehensive directory, so list is not needed. Articles about notable churches here will be grouped in the geographic church category tree (Category:Churches in Edmonton). --Lquilter (talk) 14:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is an arbitrary list that adds no encyclopedic content, as is this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this. • Freechild'sup? 15:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is a substantial compilation with many links to websites. I note that the list for Fort Wayne has been kept (though only for want of consensus), in which case other substantial lists should follow the same course. It would however be better if there were rather more text. And is this information readily available elsewhere? Peterkingiron (talk) 09:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The phone book usually suffices. --Lquilter 13:19, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.