Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Future Is Wild species

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If you can find anywhere that would take this all you have to do is ask Courcelles 17:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Future Is Wild species

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article treats very many (all?) "species" which were hypothesized to might evolve in the documentary The Future is Wild. The species + the periods are treated in a way as if this fiction is a truth. I see (apart from the style issue of presenting fiction as truth) no encyclopedic value in this extensive treatment and regard it as a fan site. The species are not treated extensively in popular culture or science warranting inclusion of an article on that ground. I realize wikipedia has (de facto) much lower standards for notability of lists than of articles, but in view of the treatment of the subject, the introduction of the eras and the length of this list, I have treated this list as an article here. L.tak (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Really just a rehashing of the show. Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I wonder if this can be tranwikied somewhere. I loved that show and I would love to see a FIW wiki. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. Wickedjacob (talk) 06:50, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per reasons given. Η936631 (talk) 07:56, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.