Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lo-Max Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to American Epic. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lo-Max Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined A7, on the enirely fatuous and ill-informed grounds that "since when has ANY article citing the New York Times been an A7?". The cite in question may establish the notability of the product of this company notable, but not the company itself, which has hardly done anything.TheLongTone (talk) 13:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is entirely untrue that Lo-Max Films "has hardly done anything". Lo-Max Films is the film company producing American Epic, a series of documentary films to be broadcast by PBS in the US and by the BBC in the UK, which are executive-produced by T Bone Burnett, Robert Redford, and Jack White. These are all notable organizations and people, and Lo-Max Films is mentioned independently by press reports cited in the References. Gold6789 (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Gold6789 13:51, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTINHERITED. WP:TOOSOON TheLongTone (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete The NYT sources does not mention the article-subject. The others are trivial mentions. Notability is not inherited. We are not in a position to evaluate the article-subject's significance, only whether the source material has done so and they have not. CorporateM (Talk) 07:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to American Epic. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to American Epic as suggested above with my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) finding nothing to suggest independent notability aside from one mention here. SwisterTwister talk 04:06, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Available sources speaking about Lo-Max all speak more about its relationship with American Epic, and less about Lo-Max as a production company. Heck, even the article itself tells us "The company is producing a series of four music films under the banner of American Epic". So while it might be spoken of and sourced within the articles on American Epic and those of its founders Allison McGourty, Bernard MacMahon, and Duke Erikson, it does not have enough independent notability for a separate article just yet. TOO SOON. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:59, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As nominator, I'm fine with a redirect to American Epic TheLongTone (talk) 13:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.