Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lollipop Lust Kill (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lollipop Lust Kill[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band, does not meet WP:BAND notability requirements. The previous discussion which resulted in keeping the article used arguments like "they have three albums" and "they went on a tour", which would not be acceptable under our current guidelines.Rusf10 (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 01:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Cursory search reveals at least a mention in this article and a solid several mentions in contemporary magazines, including a review dedicated to them. jp×g 02:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Survived previous AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:10, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as has reliable sources coverage such as AllMusic a staff written AllMusic bio, coverage in The Toledo Blade here, CMJ here and others so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm convinced they pass GNG. That includes what Atlantic306 presented as well as additional coverage from the St. Cloud Times[1], the El Paso Times[2], The Morning Call[3], Blabbermouth[4], The Michigan Daily[5], and others. I think we'd find a lot of offlines in free press papers, too, if we could find them. Missvain (talk) 18:32, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.