Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luciano Barletta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luciano Barletta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable remixer. Definitely fails WP:NMUSICIAN and likely fails WP:GNG as well. The only two decent sources are both Q&As on websites of questionable reliability and authenticity; see for yourself here and here. Notice the remarkable similarity between these two websites. Even if we do assume that these are WP:RS and independent of Barletta and each other, the Q&As do nothing to establish that Barletta is any more notable than any other Joe Bloggs DJ remixing songs with software in his bedroom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:25, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete definitely fails GNG and NMUSICIAN. –Cupper52^Discuss! 11:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 19:46, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - falls short of WP:NMUSICIAN. -KH-1 (talk) 02:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS and WP:CREATIVE. We almost always delete articles about DJs and producers. The sources are quite sketchy. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.