Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1Click Games
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 20:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- 1Click Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a company that apparently issues a lot of press releases but lacks significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. - MrX 13:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. - MrX 13:44, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA1000 22:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 08:12, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Nothing but own sites and press release. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 08:20, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete- software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant WP:RS coverage. Refs are all press releases or incidental mentions. A search turned up no significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for above reasons, this entry seems to serve only to increase the subject's alleged notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FPTI (talk • contribs) 23:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.