Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1000 Crime Quiz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect Narcotic Drugs to narcotic and delete the rest.. NW (Talk) 20:34, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 1000 Crime Quiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the author is a notable person in his field, his books about quiz or popular science do not seem to enjoy a particular notability. Their mentions in the web are either in sites directly related to Prof. Aggrawal or in sites where the books are sold or advertised. Other reasons for and against have emerged in the talk page for 1000 Crime Quiz. (Full disclosure: I had nominated Prof. Aggrawal and his journal for deletion, but the consensus emerged has persuaded me that he and it are notable indeed.) Goochelaar (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the other articles about books by Aggrawal which, like the first one, do not seem notable, while the articles tend to have an advertising slant (large excerpts, bold claims etc.):
- 1000 Love and Sex Quiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Some Common Ailments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- The Book of Medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Narcotic Drugs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 1000 Biology Quiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Modern Diagnostics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Health Quiz Book (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Self Assessment and Review of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Goochelaar (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect Narcotic Drugs to narcotic and delete the rest. None of the articles establish any significance of these books beyond their author. Cmprince (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There already was an AFD for Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) here, which was closed as a delete and redirect. The author re-created the page in contravention of consensus. I have reverted the page to a redirect. RayTalk 11:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirecting to Anil would be good for all except Some Common Ailments, The Book of Medicine, Narcotic Drugs, Modern Diagnostics and Health Quiz Book. These titles are so generic that redirecting to Anil would not make sense.Cmprince (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 13:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Endorse Cmprince's proposal. It sounds like a good solution. None of these books appear to meet WP:BK. RayTalk 02:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per Cmprince; these are advertisements for a series of non-notable books by a just-about-notable. The articles seem to have have been written by the man himself. pablohablo. 08:41, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep WP:FP for reasoning —Preceding unsigned comment added by Testmasterflex (talk • contribs) 23:12, 21 September 2009
- Comment WP:FP is for Featured Pictures on Wikipedia. It does not apply to this discussion. Cmprince (talk) 16:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- After reading Testmasterflex's talk page, it appears he or she may have been referring to WP:5P. Cmprince (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.