Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/12oz Prophet (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 October 14.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

12oz Prophet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources found. Redlinky, lacking in sources, tagged for sources for four years now. Last AFD was four years ago and resulted in no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WEB. When they've had 4 years to find sources and STILL haven't come up with anything, the only reasonable conclusion is there simply aren't any to find. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:10, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although it seems to be an interesting website, it doesn't appear notable. Unless it's relisted, I'm afraid that 12 ounce is no match for 10 pound. Mandsford 01:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Starblind/Andrew Lenahan - it appears to have been a flash in the pan. Not all fanzines (or websizes for that matter) are per se notable. Bearian (talk) 19:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.