Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Afshinam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete . ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Afshinam

(Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article declined 4 times in 5 days SeraphWiki (talk) 12:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on: Kind of quick on the trigger here; draft isn't even a week old. While the draft as written has no hope in mainspace, the rapid-fire submissions is something that ought to be addressed by talking to the editor and, if it's disruptive, seeking sanctions. That said, I think it's pretty likely that this isn't going to be useful to anybody and is just a WP:FAKEARTICLE. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I went over the RfC about notability and Mfd, while I admittedly didn't read every comment, there seemed to be fairly strong support for considering notability in cases where drafts were rapidly resubmitted and did not have any realistic probability of becoming articles. I should have mentioned that, because there could be situations where a draft was declined several times in a short period but was still generally on track to becoming an article. I don't agree that escalating to sanctions is necessarily the first step, and I'm not an admin, so its not my call when to sanction - but they will usually do it when a deleted article is recreated multiple times in a way that becomes disruptive and a block is necessary to prevent further disruption.SeraphWiki (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 00:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable or fake/vanity article. —DIYeditor (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly does not satisfy WP:GNG. David.moreno72 03:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and foregoing. I have no problem with a rapid-fire nomination of a page that already is declined 4 times and "isn't going to be useful to anybody and is just a WP:FAKEARTICLE". No need to keep this around any longer. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.