Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Top 100 Weather Moments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Top 100 Weather Moments (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Non-notable television series with no reliable sources as per draft discussion. MikeM2011 (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Lack of demonstrated notability is simply not a valid reason to delete a draft. See WP:DEMOLISH. The only "draft discussion" is a single one-line comment saying that there4 are no secondary sources cited, and then that YouTube is not a reliable source. which is simply untrue. YouTube is a platform, not a publisher. May items on it are not reliable sources, quite a few are. YouTube cites must be evaluated case-by-case. But that is not very relevant here, because notability is not an issue here. Unless the draft is so promotional that it cannot be fixzed without starting over, or was created in bad faith, or oen of the speedy deletion criteria apply, or has been tendentiously resubmitted over and over without significant improvement, thus wasting everyone's time when the submitter should have know better, an MfD for a draft is usually a waste of time. Can you be sure that no reliable sources exist? Including offline? In any case, why not allow the creator (and perhaps others) to attempt to establish notability? if the effort fails, no harm is done. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 16:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notability will be determined if this is submitted. It is a draft and belongs there.Lightburst (talk) 22:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - We need an essay on WP:ITSADRAFT. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 08:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.