Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LukaRuckels/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


LukaRuckels

LukaRuckels (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

04 March 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Keep in mind that User:QRtrains was later found to also be a sock of LukaRuckels.

Notifying NinjaRobotPirate, who blocked LukaRuckels and QRtrains. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 00:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

28 April 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same edit, more or less same username as the last sockpuppet (James Emerston) makes it a dead giveaway. I've also added the IP, as it was clearly the same user trying to blank this case while logged out. Notifying NinjaRobotPirate. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 09:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
NinjaRobotPirate, this vs. this is the only real evidence that I have. I'm looking at the edits themselves and the edit summaries, but if I'm wrong, I'm wrong; however, an attempt by an IP to blank this section – whether it was by this person or not – still needs to be taken into consideration. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 11:46, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jamesmp1184 is  Possible but leaning toward  Unlikely. There's some degree of overlap in the technical data, but some of it is quite dissimilar, too. no No comment with respect to IP address(es). Most of the accounts I've checked have been very easy to confirm, so I'm going to close this for now. The evidence just isn't there. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:47, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a good reason that links can’t be made. It isn’t a fake account and Joshua Wynne should stop trying to be a little detective. I’m a well known contributor to Railway Digest and when my article is published major changes will be happening to the 700/NGR Page. Thanks, Mick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmp1184 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate, what do you make of this from Mr Innocent up here? 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 08:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Whilst there might have been some doubt surrounding the last report, this user's editing pattern is more disruptive (reverting me and attempting to get me blocked). In this edit, he again removes images and replaces them with images uploaded by other LukaRuckels sockpuppets, and after making three edits to try and clean up what had been changed, this editor goes bang on the undo button, one, two, three times. That should tell you everything. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 05:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

There’s a good reason that links can’t be made. It isn’t a fake account and Joshua Wynne should stop trying to be a little detective. I’m a well known contributor to Railway Digest and when my article is published major changes will be happening to the 700/NGR Page. Thanks, Mick.

Just take a look at all these other places where I am ... Facebook - (Redacted) Flickr - (Redacted) 

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmp1184 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
NinjaRobotPirate, thank you – regarding the previous report, feel free to close it as well if you haven't found anything. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 10:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
NinjaRobotPirate [1] marked the April 28th report as closed. Archiving. Mkdw talk 16:20, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This vs. this (similar edits). This (skip to the bottom of the diff, under the Future section) will show you what little difference there is between the two, and this was used to cover it up. "[N]othing says SM is replacing EM as of yet" is also an argument that this person has used before. The funniest thing? "I'm not going to make anymore socks or edits on your little train pages... but mark my words. I. Will. Be. Back. You better watch out" – nine days ago. That didn't take very long, did it? 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 00:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 May 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Need I say any more? Tagging NinjaRobotPirate, Oshwah and Edgar181. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

7 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

This should tell you enough. Pinging Oshwah. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 01:11, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

28 June 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Our friend has stated that they will not be creating any more sockpuppets, but that still doesn't mean that they should be allowed to edit on Wikipedia (and how is it "not block evasion"?). One right does not make up for a hundred wrongs. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 12:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Calmly resolved. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

07 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

see username —Guanaco 00:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

19 July 2018

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Quite obvious based on contributions. The user also sent me a direct message via Instagram recently asking that their images be removed from the relevant pages, which I ignored, so this appears to be the user trying to do it themselves. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 14:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/LukaRuckels/Archive&oldid=851563208"