Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 12

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unneeded fork of Template:Swatch Frietjes (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 20:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Tom Petty with Template:Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers.
I think users interested in navigating through Petty's music career would want to go through both Heartbreakers and solo work which would be much more beneficial in one NAVBOX. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 22:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, is anyone going to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bebe & Bassy Tour and fix the icons that are showing up blank? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose merge, I don't see a significant number of redundant links, and they are different bands. Frietjes (talk) 18:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • One is a band but when one thinks of Tom Petty's career work one doesn't distinguish between the solo work and Heartbreakers work as one might do for Paul McCartney and the Beatles or even Phil Collins and Genesis, for example. It is a disservice to readers to not be able to navigate from his solo albums from the Heartbreakers albums. Even the solo work received heavy participation from members of the Heartbreakers. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree. I just created the corresponding navbox on the French Wikipedia and it seemed better to have a single template for solo Petty, Mudcrutch and the Heartbreakers. These two bands are strongly connected to Petty himself, much more than Deep Purple is to Joe Satriani. Besides, Petty's non-Heartbreakers output is sufficiently limited (three releases with Mudcrutch and three as a solo artist) that including it within a single navbox does not make the result too long or complicated; see Palette Tom Petty. (The Wilburys are another matter: since all five band members have dedicated navboxes, some of them very long, I can see why a dedicated navbox makes sense.) – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reply - As Ælfgar just said, "all five band members have dedicated navboxes". If we merge these templates, then we must also merge templates {{Linkin Park}} and {{Linkin Park songs}} (and similar song templates).
Again, is anyone going to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bebe & Bassy Tour? --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 16:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, created by compromised account Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 00:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template used on only one page and does not need to be a template. Incorporated the information into the page it was used and no longer needs to exist. Yosemiter (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox medical condition. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 20:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox fracture with Template:Infobox medical condition.
Makes no sense to keep this as a separate template. The amount of work needed to merge the templates is small and would allow for use of one template across multiple languages. Carl Fredrik talk 14:06, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, almost all redlinks, not a good navigational tool given its enormous size Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 14:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused single-use template Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 14:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused single-use templates Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 14:00, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. Almost none of these languages is exclusive to the region stated. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please add (non-noincluded} tfd tags to all pages you nominate for deletion. {{repeat|p|3}}ery (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, far more redlinks than blue Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, outdated Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 20. (non-admin closure) J947( c ) (m) 21:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no valid purpose Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete WP:CSD#G7 - requested by author. ansh666 21:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, outdated, only one valid link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Thought I'd be following up each season when I first created the template, but thanks to poor management of the league + my procrastination things haven't panned out that way. Only one valid link in the template as pointed out by TenPoundHammer. Davykamanzitalkcontribsalter ego 13:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:07, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, outdated Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 13:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 20:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox holiday with Template:Infobox recurring event.
per WP:INFOCOL and MOS:IB. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS. {{Infobox festival}} is already a redirect to {{Infobox recurring event}}. However, a lot of festival pages use {{Infobox holiday}}. Should festival be redirected to {{Infobox holiday}} then? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:15, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, because festivals aren't holidays, even if some holidays have festivals associated with them. —Farix (t | c) 11:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As already mentioned, names of the mentioned Infoboxes are irrelevant. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. You've seriously never heard of any recurring event that isn't a holiday? A trade show, a conference, a summit meeting, etc etc etc — Smuckola(talk) 06:41, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Neither of these infoboxes serve the same purpose or similar topic areas nor do they have any likeness with each other. Which one would you use for an annual fair, convention, or festival? Would you use the same infobox for holidays such as Labor Day, Mother's Day, Christmas, New Years? —Farix (t | c) 11:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'll simply use {{Infobox recurring event}}. But let me ask you, which one would you use for Holi, Diwali, Raksha Bandhan, etc.? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. As a note regarding the lone difference ("article" vs "lead"), {{technical}} contains a code for changing "article" to "section", so it should be trivial to request "lead" also be added to the template. Primefac (talk) 00:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused fork of {{Technical}}. Just use that template instead. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, all links redirect to parent Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, unlikely to be used Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no reason to keep Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

mostly redlinks, no parent article Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no parent article Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no criteria for "important" Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, no criteria for "important" Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, mostly redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, contains only one link Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, mostly redlinks Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unused, listed items do not seem to fit the topic Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, everything redirects to the parent Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 October 20. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 20:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).