Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three links. Everything else is red. No navigational requirement is presented. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:25, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to convert. Please stick to the grounds of the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:59, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ofcourse there's stuff to convert. It's a list of ships, lists of ships exists as articles on Wikipedia. That is the substance of the template, and it should instead be a list article, so it should be listified. Listification is a valid outcome of a TfD (a form of substing with editing), and per WP:CLN this should be a list. This can be accomplished by moving this page to DRAFT:List of Design 1074 ships and removing the navbox formatting, leaving the list. That will then contain the edit history of the base list -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hebrew Bible campaignboxes

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 13. Izno (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-book citation template created in 2009 and used only once, in a talk page discussion at Talk:Twin paradox/Archive 13. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. {{sidebar games events}} appears to be preferred in relevant articles like Boxing at the 1976 Summer Olympics. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Stockholm metro Frietjes (talk) 20:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Not advisable to use, per MOS:LINKCOLOR. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link to an article. Everything else is red or a redirect. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Rail template; the only remaining transclusion was updated to use the new Module:Adjacent stations/Luas. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/NI Railways Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Iarnród Éireann Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:+ tracks (for Ed Sheeran albums)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. We generally don't create track listings for albums in template space; they are article content. There is a better track listing at the album's page (and here and here) already. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is only included in one article (Mandaibazar Assembly constituency) with the data already present in a section there. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Jakarta MRT and Module:Adjacent stations/Jakarta LRT. Gonnym (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).