Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 9, 2022.

India at the India at the 2022 World Athletics Championships

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:R3 applies. signed, Rosguill talk 19:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article was incorrectly title for about 5 minutes. No use for a redirect from this former name. MB 23:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

"Episode ####" redirects to EastEnders lists or articles

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#"Episode ####" redirects to EastEnders lists or articles

Websafe

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Websafe

Crimea river

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Crimea#Hydrography for containing the most relevant encyclopedic information at the moment. No prejudice against creating a list article later. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Ambiguous. There are 4 Crimean rivers with articles (see Category:Rivers of Crimea.) CLYDEFRANKLIN 16:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Casper Magico

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RDELETE reasons 2 and 10. The redirect is confusing since the artist recorded many other songs. The redirect can plausibly be expanded into an article and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Muhandes (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nio García

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RDELETE reasons 2 and 10. The redirect is confusing since the artist recorded many other songs. The redirect can plausibly be expanded into an article and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Muhandes (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anema (fungus)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. An RM can be opened later to switch up the article's disambiguating qualifier. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect should be deleted. Nothing links to it, and I doubt very much that someone would type "Anema (fungus)" into the search box! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MeegsC (talkcontribs) 13:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was formerly a link from the disambiguation page (which then redirected to anema (lichen), rather than just showing anema (lichen) on the dab page) and our new outline of lichens page also linked there until we found the more specific Anema (lichen) page. Those two former links account for the traffic that shows over the past 90 days. MeegsC (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Jay I am a biology expert! ;) That's why I suggested this redirect was unnecessary. Yes, Anema is sort of a fungus. It's actually lichen, a composite organism that contains a fungal component. But this redirect is not used anywhere. Is there a point in keeping an unused redirect? MeegsC (talk) 10:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Um, the fungus is actually a lichen. And the article Anema (lichen) has certainly existed for over a year, so the redirect (which was only on the disambiguation page) was completely unnecessary. The person who put it there could have just as easily (as I did last week) put the link directly on the DAB page! MeegsC (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, I understand that Presidentman. But would you type ANEMA (FUNGUS)" into a search box? Or would you type ANEMA? That's what I'm asking. Because the only place that links with Anema (fungus) is the search box. Personally, I can't imagine anyone typing ANEMA (FUNGUS). But perhaps the average user is far more specific than I think. (LOL) But I'm fine with a keep; it's no skin off my nose. I won't bother tagging it for our project, because I can't imagine it ever be used. The redirect team can keep an eye on it! MeegsC (talk) 10:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    We don't know. The pageviews will indicate if people are using the fungus redirect. Someone who knows anema as a fungus will look for the anema fungus search result. Jay 💬 09:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Accelerated phase

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Accelerated phase

Philalethia

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Philalethia

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#겋

Baby Blast

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable element in the movie that is not mentioned in the target article. Dominicmgm (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: This is a trivial scene in the movie that would be unlikely to be mentioned in the article as it was not particularly notable to the plot itself and was not a big cultural phenomenon. As an aside, I believe the name would be properly BabyBlast; however, that needn't be created. TartarTorte 16:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Colonization of Earth

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Colonization of Earth

Adresses of Russian Embassies changed recently

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is "recently"? This redirect will be problematic in the future and it should be deleted. Super Ψ Dro 11:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hanging Man

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Hanging Man

Prime Minister of Argentina

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Prime Minister of Argentina

Gstieß

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Trull (cards)#The Fool, Scüs, Sküs or Gstieß. plicit 11:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RLOTE. No particular affinity between this tarot card and the German language. CycloneYoris talk! 08:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of former GMA Artist Center artists

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for deletion under AfD last October 2021. Title is non sense at the redirect target, the "Lists" has no connection within the target. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Most viewed article

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 19:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Should this redirect to WP:Statistics or WP:Popular pages? Interstellarity (talk) 20:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 05:26, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think it's referring to Top 25 reportTazuco ✉️ 21:10, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Neural mechanisms of in-group favoritism

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obscure, long title only redirecting to a section heading. Zero pageviews since its creation on 2021-11-26. Orphan. If not deleted, it should probably redirect instead to In-group favoritism. Darcyisverycute (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 16:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Schoolboy humour

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Schoolboy humour

Christian Taliban

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 16#Christian Taliban

Laurel green

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Shades of green#Laurel green. This is essentially a "withdrawn". (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 03:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article, and doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere else on Wikipedia either. Steel1943 (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Ø

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible search term. This uses the Latin O with stroke, while the symbol used for "null" is . It is very unlikely that readers would look up either of these symbols, so I suggest deleting the redirect. FAdesdae378 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.