Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Euryalus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit count for Euryalus

[edit]
User:Euryalus

   run at Wed Nov 5 03:36:16 2008 GMT

   Category talk:         542
   Category:              45
   Help talk:             1
   Help:                  1
   Image:                 22
   Mainspace              7603
   Portal:                18
   Talk:                  3512
   Template talk:         6
   Template:              21
   User talk:             1393
   User:                  169
   Wikipedia talk:        61
   Wikipedia:             610
   avg edits per page     1.58
   earliest               04:20, 9 April 2007
   number of unique pages 8887
   total                  14004

   2007/4  769
   2007/5  896
   2007/6  742
   2007/7  1039
   2007/8  746
   2007/9  483
   2007/10 359
   2007/11 938
   2007/12 1907
   2008/1  1236
   2008/2  1974
   2008/3  599
   2008/4  165
   2008/5  226
   2008/6  301
   2008/7  171
   2008/8  429
   2008/9  598
   2008/10 358
   2008/11 68

   (green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red
   denotes edits without an edit summary)

                      Mainspace
   95 [2]HM Bark Endeavour
   83 [3]Elizabeth I of England
   51 [4]List of New South Wales government agencies
   39 [5]Sir Thomas Rich's School
   34 [6]Princess Leia Organa
   33 [7]Peter Costello
   31 [8]Greenhouse effect
   31 [9]History of slavery
   30 [10]Jacques-Yves Cousteau
   30 [11]Christopher
   28 [12]Ship model
   27 [13]Ewens Ponds (South Australia)
   26 [14]Billingham
   26 [15]Zombie
   26 [16]Port Nolloth

              Talk:
   26 [17]Nicola Roxon
   18 [18]Noel Desmond Gray
   17 [19]Kevin Rudd
   12 [20]Hobart Freeman
   11 [21]Port
   10 [22]Pedophilia
   10 [23]Homosexuality
   9  [24]September 11 attacks
   8  [25]Port Qasim
   7  [26]Containerization
   7  [27]Indigenous Australians
   7  [28]Port of Hamburg
   7  [29]HM Bark Endeavour
   6  [30]Port of Spain
   6  [31]Tim Flannery

                       Category talk:
   3 [32]Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tobias Conradi
   2 [33]Deakin University alumni
   2 [34]Sunshine Coast, Queensland geography stubs
   2 [35]Survey vessels of Australia

                         Category:
   5 [36]Unassessed-Class Ports articles
   3 [37]Unassessed Ports articles
   3 [38]Ports articles by quality
   2 [39]Stub-Class Ports articles
   2 [40]Mid-importance Ports articles
   2 [41]No-importance Ports articles
   2 [42]High-importance Ports articles
   2 [43]Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Tobias Conradi
   2 [44]FA-Class Ports articles

                      Image:
   3 [45]Dadhc logo.gif
   3 [46]Chen-propaganda-poster.jpg
   2 [47]Thefeelers supersystem-album-cover.jpg
   2 [48]1200 Techniques - Consistency Theory.jpg
   2 [49]Nswplanning.gif

                      Portal:
   3 [50]New South Wales/Opentask
   3 [51]New South Wales/Selected article/09, 2008
   2 [52]Current events/2005 October 7
   2 [53]New South Wales/Selected picture/Archives
   2 [54]New South Wales/Selected article/Archives

       Template:
   4 [55]WP Ports
   2 [56]Portsinterest
   2 [57]Ref Kentucky

    Template talk:
   5 [58]Did you know

                  User:
   36 [59]Euryalus
   16 [60]Euryalus/Contributions
   15 [61]Euryalus/temp
   10 [62]Euryalus/Draft
   10 [63]Euryalus/temp2
   7  [64]Nixeagle/potential crap 3/4
   6  [65]Moondyne/AU categories
   5  [66]Moondyne/Politician infoboxes
   5  [67]Euryalus/monobook.js
   5  [68]Euryalus/sandbox
   4  [69]Euryalus/temp3
   3  [70]Euryalus/draft2
   3  [71]Everyking
   2  [72]Steve Pastor
   2  [73]Nixeagle/problem BLPs

           User talk:
   44 [74]Euryalus
   17 [75]Betacommand
   12 [76]Matilda
   6  [77]Hesperian/Archive 27
   6  [78]Timeshift9
   6  [79]Mattinbgn
   6  [80]QRS
   5  [81]165.139.0.20
   5  [82]Deathtopplintheir40s
   5  [83]Shawnpoo
   5  [84]76.190.65.162
   4  [85]Gogo Dodo
   4  [86]Redvers
   4  [87]Sinolinkconsulting
   4  [88]Newsreporter2

                             Wikipedia:
   26 [89]Requests for comment/User names
   25 [90]WikiProject Ports
   24 [91]Australian Wikipedians' notice board
   20 [92]Administrator intervention against vandalism
   17 [93]WikiProject Deletion sorting/Australia
   13 [94]Administrators' noticeboard
   12 [95]New articles (Australia)
   12 [96]Images and media for deletion/2007 September 4
   11 [97]Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
   7  [98]Articles for deletion/Australian federal election, 2010
   7  [99]WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/August 2007
   6  [100]Copyright problems/2007 June 27/Articles
   6  [101]WikiProject Military history/Coordinators/February 2008
   5  [102]Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight
   5  [103]Suspected sock puppets/Mediatemple

                  Wikipedia talk:
   18 [104]WikiProject Australian politics
   10 [105]WikiProject Ports
   6  [106]Requests for comment/User names
   6  [107]WikiProject Kentucky
   4  [108]WikiProject Australian places
   4  [109]WikiProject Ships
   2  [110]AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage
   2  [111]Non-administrator rollback
   2  [112]Template namespace
   2  [113]WikiProject Australian historic places

   If there were any problems, please [114]email Interiot or post at
   [115]User talk:Interiot.


  • The edit count was retrieved from this link at 03:36, 5 November 2008 (UTC).

Comments reposted from main page

[edit]
  • Still looking you over, but wanted to make comment to you (and others who might be contemplating an RFA). Please start carrying on conversations on the page where they started. It is very difficult to follow discussions where the conversation jumps from page to page and you end up searching in 2 or more different archies trying to piece together what happened. This is particularly true for vandal fighters.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 06:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • There is no consensus on the question of where replies should be posted. Of all the pros and cons I have heard on either side of the debate, "someone might want to review this discussion if I am ever nominated for adminship" is the least convincing. In my view this issue is much bigger than this RfA, and therefore irrelevant to it. I invite you or anyone else to move this threatd elsewhere or nuke it altogether. Hesperian 10:53, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]