Shortcut: WD:PP/ORG

Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Property proposal: Generic Authority control Person Organization
Creative work Place Sports Sister projects
Transportation Natural science Computing Lexeme

See also

This page is for the proposal of new properties.

Before proposing a property

  1. Search if the property already exists.
  2. Search if the property has already been proposed.
  3. Check if you can give a similar label and definition as an existing Wikipedia infobox parameter, or if it can be matched to an infobox, to or from which data can be transferred automatically.
  4. Select the right datatype for the property.
  5. Read Wikidata:Creating a property proposal for guidelines you should follow when proposing new property.
  6. Start writing the documentation based on the preload form below by editing the two templates at the top of the page to add proposal details.

Creating the property

  1. Once consensus is reached, change status=ready on the template, to attract the attention of a property creator.
  2. Creation can be done 1 week after the creation of the proposal, by a property creator or an administrator.
  3. See property creation policy.

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2024/08.

Politics/public election

--PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC) WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --PoliceSheep99 (talk) 02:00, 11 January 2021 (UTC) WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. WikiProject every politician has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. --Lewisiscrazy (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

‎APPF registration status

   Under discussion
Descriptionstatus of registration of this entity with the Authority for European political parties and European political foundation
RepresentsAuthority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (Q28000601)
Data typeString
DomainEuropean political party (Q24649)
Allowed valuescurrently registered, formerly registered, never registered
Example 1European People's Party (Q208242)currently registered
Example 2Alliance for Peace and Freedom (Q19834410)formerly registered
Example 3European Federation of Green Parties (Q19966963)never registered
Planned useFollowing the creation of the Authority for European political parties and European political foundations, political organisations are required to register with the APPF to obtain the status of European party or foundation. The goal of this property is therefore to distinguish between entities that are currently registered as European parties or foundations, that were previously registered with the APPF, or that never registered with the APPF (but were still valid European parties or foundations before the APPF was created). Currently, "instance of" Q24649 is not sufficient to make the difference between these three categories.
Expected completenesseventually complete (Q21873974)
CountryEuropean Union
Distinct-values constraintyes

Motivation

I'm working on European parties, and I note that current European parties are marked as "instance of" European political party (Q24649), but so are former European parties. It is right for former European parties to be marked as "instance of European parties", but it means that this information alone is insufficient to tell current and former European parties apart, given the registration requirement to qualify as a European political party. This is all applicable to European political foundations.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Julius Schwarz (talk • contribs) at 13:50, August 3, 2024 (UTC).

Discussion

@Julius Schwarz: I think this could be more useful if we created an external ID property for APPF registration pages, which could then have statements with existing qualifier subject has role (P2868) whether the party/foundation is currently registered or removed from the register. For example, this would look like European People's Party (Q208242)AFFP party/foundation ID20201022CPU32631subject has role (P2868)currently registered. –Samoasambia 15:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel

Organization

National Museum of Archeology, History and Art

See also Wikidata:Property proposal/Pending for approved items awaiting the deployment of currently unavailable datatypes