Naar inhoud springen

Euverlèk gebroeker:Pahles: Versjèl tösje versies

Pagina-inhoud wordt niet ondersteund in andere talen.
Van Wikipedia
Verwijderde inhoud Toegevoegde inhoud
Nemo bis (Euverlèk | biedrages)
Rschen7754 (Euverlèk | biedrages)
Tekslien 143: Tekslien 143:


All ok then? [[Gebroeker:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[Euverlèk gebroeker:Nemo bis|euverlègk]]) 2 jul 2014 14:46 (CEST)
All ok then? [[Gebroeker:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[Euverlèk gebroeker:Nemo bis|euverlègk]]) 2 jul 2014 14:46 (CEST)

== Your admin status ==

Hello. I'm a [[:m:stewards|steward]]. A new [[:m:Admin activity review|policy]] regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by [[:m:Requests for comment/Activity levels of advanced administrative rights holders|community consensus]] recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.
 
You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on '''liwiki''', where you are a bureaucrat and administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.
 
If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at [[:m:Stewards' noticeboard]], and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.
 
We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on [[:m:Stewards' noticeboard]].
 
Best regards, '''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 17 aug 2014 23:30 (CEST)

Versie op 17 aug 2014 23:30

Dit is de Euverlègk pagina van PAhles. Es te miech hei get vreugs, geef iech ouch hei antwoord.
De kins hei ouch terech veur vraoge/opmerkinge euver miene bot PahlesBot.


Please don't make translation requests. I will not fulfill them!


Es te miech get wèls zègke kins te hei klikke veur 'n nui oonderwerp aon te make.
Of klik op 't 'plus'-teike bovenaon dees pagina.
Mien arsjief kins te hei vinde:
t/m 2007, 2008, 2009 en 2010


Australië

Nein, dat móste v'r idd neet vergete. Probleem mèt die dinger is evels totste ze dèks zoe lesteg op einen daag kins plekke. 't Begint besjeie en pas later krijg 't catastrofaol proporties. En 't geit mer door, meh um noe edersdaags get te melle... Perceis zoeget had iech mèt Pakistan, de brand in Rusland en 't kindermisbruuk door preesters veureg jaor. Steinbach 4 jan 2011 11:17 (CET)[reageren]

Klop, iech höb noe mer nao 'nen daag gezeuk boe NU.nl verwees. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 jan 2011 11:20 (CET)[reageren]

File deletion warning

Please see: commons:User talk:Pahles#File deletion warning. Thank you. --Tomchen1989 10 jan 2011 05:08 (CET)[reageren]

Sjablone

Daag Pahles, wieste gezeen höbs, haw iech miech de lèste daog bezeg mèt neet-bestoonde sjablone. Doa zien evels nog wel get roej links bij die oet dien coord-sjabloon koume. Aongezeen iech dat zelf neet gans begriep en 't dien idee waor, wèl iech vraoge ofste dao get vaan kins aofmake? Steinbach 21 jan 2011 10:37 (CET)[reageren]

Iech zal dao de koumende tied 'ns nao goon loere! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 jan 2011 10:42 (CET)[reageren]

Dat is 'nen ingelogkde vandaol, die kinste rösteg veur ieweg blokkere. Dat is entans normaal beleid op nl:, en iech kin miech dao wel in vinde. Steinbach 15 fib 2011 12:29 (CET)[reageren]

Euh...

 :-)   Wutsje 18 fib 2011 13:17 (CET)[reageren]

Sorry!!!! Moet weer goed zijn zo. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 18 fib 2011 13:20 (CET)[reageren]
Geeft niet hoor, we klikken allemaal wel es verkeerd. Ik moest alleen wel lachen toen ik dit zag:
[13:16:34] <CVNBot6> Added: Wutsje]] is on global blacklist, added by Pahles until 12:16, 28 February 2011 ("Autoblacklist: Pazjena's leeghole on li.wikipedia")
Groet, Wutsje 18 fib 2011 13:22 (CET)[reageren]
Ik was gewoon te snel en lette niet op. Bedankt overigens voor het opletten hier! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 18 fib 2011 13:24 (CET)[reageren]

Bevolkingsdeechde Nederland

Hei in Nederland höbbe v'r nogal väöl water, >18% wie in 't artikel steit. Iech dink tot 't versjèl ziech liet verkloare oet 't al of neet mètrekene daovaan. Steinbach 20 fib 2011 14:43 (CET)[reageren]

Klop inderdaad. Mer aongezeen alle groete Wiki's gewoen 't totaol oppervlak rekene (dus inclusief 't water) en ze dus allemaol roond de 400/km² oetkoume, dink iech tot veer dat ouch mote doen. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 fib 2011 16:07 (CET)[reageren]

Toesje

...steit gewoen in de NMD es vertaoling vaan 'ruilen'. Neve ruile, dat wel. Steinbach 21 mrt 2011 13:08 (CET)[reageren]

Dat wis iech daan weer neet, iech had evels gezeuk bij "verwisselen" (NL) in d'n Digi-Dictionair en dee kós dat neet. Zoe liers te ederen daag get nuits. Iech höb 't nog noets gehuurd, en ierlek gezag dink iech tot neet väöl lui 't (nog) gebruke ('t klink miech erg awwerwèts in mien oere). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 21 mrt 2011 15:59 (CET)[reageren]

Daag Pahles, iech had zoe 'n idee. 't Artikel Space Shuttle is nog neet zoe laank, meh de bis wel umeer enthousias bezeg aon artikele euver inkel missies en väöl aander gelieerde artikele bestoon ouch al. Zouw 't 'n idee zien veur 't artikel oet te bouwe tot staar-artikel? Daan kin 't op de veurpaasj weure gelink es strak 't Space Shuttle-program op zien ind löp. Dat is pas in juli, dus dao is nog wel eve tied veur. En natuurlek wèl iech ouch wel e deil vaan zoe projek veur mien rekening numme. Steinbach 4 jun 2011 18:47 (CEST)[reageren]

Iech wèl dao zeker wel aon mètwèrke. Iech höb 't artikel zjus eve geleze, mer iech bin neet gelökkeg demèt, 't ligk allemaol get doorein. Iech zal iers 'ns naodinke euver 'n indeiling. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 4 jun 2011 21:08 (CEST)[reageren]
Iech höb nog 'ns naogedach heieuver, mer iech dink neet tot 't artikel Space Shuttle ziech lient veur dit idee. Iech gaon 'n artikel aonmake geneump Spaceshuttleprogram, wat ouch mier ingeit op de gesjiedenis enzoe. 't Is tenslotte 't program wat oetsjeit, neet de Space Shuttle zelf.- Pahles | zègk 't mer 10 jun 2011 22:28 (CEST)[reageren]

Oonzin vaan dee MAVO in Remun

Iech höb mer eve de ganse range twie weke geblokkeerd, de kins aanders wel bezeg blieve. Steinbach 17 jun 2011 13:09 (CEST)[reageren]

Prima! - Pahles | zègk 't mer 17 jun 2011 13:11 (CEST)[reageren]

Anglicisme

Wie kumstiech dao zoe bij? Iech höb gewoen 't woordgebruuk vaan de Winkler Prins euvergenome. administratie veur regering, dat is 'n anglicisme, meh 'n indeiling um 't land op orde te kinne hawwe weurt al 'n iewegheid zoe geneump. Steinbach 11 jul 2011 10:22 (CEST)[reageren]

Iech mein dat örges geleze te höbbe (volges miech op de NL wiki). Toch liek miech bestuurlek beter es administratief, zoewies te zelf al zègks: e land weurt geregeerd door e bestuur, neet door 'n administratie. Es 't diech niks oetmaak zouw iech dus liever bestuurlek gebruke. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 11 jul 2011 12:26 (CEST)[reageren]
Ich bön 't mit Pahles ins. Administratief deit drek dinken aan administratieve kosten. --OosWesThoesBes 11 jul 2011 20:03 (CEST)[reageren]
Meh es 't neet fout is, heet edere gebruker de vrijheid 't woord te gebruke wat 'r priffereert. Es iemes ölger sjrief, gaon iech dao neet örgel vaan make umtot iech dat zelf zègk. Steinbach 11 jul 2011 20:48 (CEST)[reageren]
Woorden.org zaet det 't in dees beteikenis Zuid-Nederlands is (zèk dus meh gerös Vlaams). --OosWesThoesBes 12 jul 2011 12:48 (CEST)[reageren]
Mestreech, op dezelfde breiddegraod es Breusel en Duinkerke, inkel kilometers vaan de taolgrens aof en ouch nog ins aon drei kante door 't Belsj umgeve, kin wel geach te hure tot 't Zuid-Nederlands taolgebeed. Es oondersteuning kin iech aanders wel 'n waslies aon gemein wäörd en gallicismes opveure. Steinbach 12 jul 2011 13:17 (CEST)[reageren]
't Einege wat iech kin aondrage is dit (zuug twiede veurbeeld). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 12 jul 2011 13:24 (CEST)[reageren]

E jungske

Wie dèks höbstiech bij Juanes geloerd wat 'r waor :p? Steinbach 26 jul 2011 10:11 (CEST)[reageren]

Nou, 't is aon z'ne kop wel te zien, dach iech zoe ;) - Pahles | zègk 't mer 26 jul 2011 10:26 (CEST)[reageren]

Zierikzee

Kins dich zeen of ik ut good hub gedaon?? Stijnsation 7 sep 2011 22:07 (CEST)[reageren]

Iech weit neet good watste bedoels? Wat bedoelste mèt "ut"? Euveriges sjrieve v'r 't, dus zoonder de u. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 7 sep 2011 22:58 (CEST)[reageren]

Burrunantoemeleer

Zitte v'r wezelek perceis tegeliek dezelfde informatie te verwèrke :p Steinbach 15 sep 2011 11:31 (CEST)[reageren]

good toch? ;) - Pahles | zègk 't mer 15 sep 2011 11:42 (CEST)[reageren]

Charlotte's Web (1973)

Hi, I wanted to add to this page, it's too short in my opionion. Do you know where I can request a translation from the Dutch or English Wikipedias? Charlotte 2011 27 sep 2011 13:44 (CEST)[reageren]

I'm sorry, we don't do translation requests. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 27 sep 2011 13:51 (CEST)[reageren]
There's no page for volunteer translators? If that's true, then how do pages get expanded? Do you have to have someone interested in the topic? Charlotte 2011 28 sep 2011 01:27 (CEST)[reageren]
Again, we don't do translation request, see the top of this page, and the top of our village pump page. We are only a very small group of contributors and don't have the time for (mostly) fan based requests. Articles about movies, small villages in Poland or Russia and the likes are (at the moment) of no interest to us or the readers of the Limburgian Wikipedia. Please refrain from further requesting translations or contributing in literally translated Dutch or English text. Limburgish is not easy for non-Limburgians, meaning we have to correct your contribution just to get it to comply to our standards, taking away time doing more meaningful stuff here. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 28 sep 2011 11:37 (CEST)[reageren]

Nordelik

Jao, is mich good, mar zal ich alles dan umzette naor NORdelik?? Alles?? Stijnsation 3 okt 2011 14:03 (CEST)[reageren]

Iech zègk neet totsdiech get mós wijzege. Boe 't um geit is tot 't neet consequent liek. Iech weit neet wat good Vinloos is, iech hoop totsdiech dat beter wèts. Is 't Noerdelik of Nordelik (of mesjiens wel Noordelik)?
't Is euveriges gewoen um antwoord te geve op de pagina boe de vraog gestèld weurt, in dit geval dien eige euverlègk-pagina... Daan blijf vraog en antwoord bij-ein. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 3 okt 2011 14:14 (CEST)[reageren]
Ok, dan is dit de letste kier um 't aaf te liere. Officieel is 't volgesmich gewoeën NORdelik, dus ik gaon now alles umzette. Stijnsation 3 okt 2011 18:30 (CEST)[reageren]

Pagina's

Boe höbbe v'r dat daan aofgesproke? En boeveur zouw dat dan euveral mote stoon? ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 14 okt 2011 12:44 (CEST)[reageren]

Hei: http://li.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_kaffee/Arsjief120210#vertaolinge_systeemberiechte_en_.27n_vraog_of_2. Boerum zouw 't neet euveral mote stoon? Blaojer waor zoe wie zoe gei Limburgs, daan zouw 't blajer mote zien (neet allein in 't Mestreechs). - Pahles | zègk 't mer 14 okt 2011 12:51 (CEST)[reageren]

Sjwerdes

Daag Pahles, höbste 't artikel daan wel verplaots nao de Wiktionair? Dat liek m'ch wel fair in zoe geval. En daan natuurlek ouch de sjriever eve opmerkzaam make, tot 'r neet dink vaan 'daon iech 't daoveur'? ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 27 nov 2011 20:55 (CET)[reageren]

Sorry, mer dat verplaotse geit miech get te wied. Iech bin mèt opzat neet actief op de Wiktionair. Iech wèl wel de sjrijver eve aonsjrieve uiteraard. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 27 nov 2011 22:44 (CET)[reageren]
Waar dit "'s werdes" ('s werkdaags; dore waek) of get anges? --OosWesThoesBes 28 nov 2011 07:01 (CET)[reageren]
Sorry, iech begriep de vraog neet. - Pahles | zègk 't mer 28 nov 2011 10:58 (CET)[reageren]
@Pahles: Owtb wèlt 't zelf op de Wiktionair aonmake en vreug noe of d'n inhaajd vaan 't artikel euvereinstump mèt wat heer dink. @Owtb: Jao, dat waor 't, en de mins gaof es specifiek veurbeeld: sjwerdese kleier. ⵙⵜⴰⵢⵏⴱⴰⵅ 28 nov 2011 11:31 (CET)[reageren]
OK, den gaon v'r d'r 'ns get wèrk van make. --OosWesThoesBes 28 nov 2011 18:33 (CET)[reageren]

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 3 mei 2013 18:50 (CEST)[reageren]

Hi, sorry for writing in English. I'm writing to ask you, as a bureaucrat of this wiki, to translate and review the notification that will be sent to all users, also on this wiki, who will be forced to change their user name on May 27 and will probably need your help with renames. You may also want to help with the pages m:Rename practices and m:Global rename policy. Thank you, Nemo 3 mei 2013 18:50 (CEST)[reageren]

Kumps de weer?

Hoi Pahles! Wie geit 't mèt uuch? Iech zaw 't oontzèttend leuk vinde es g'r weer 's langskump op dizze wikipedia! V'r höbbe uuch toch e bitteke nudeg!--Ortjens (euverlègk) 11 mei 2013 12:35 (CEST)[reageren]

Daag Pahles,

Twie'nhaaf jaor geleie biste eweggegoon. Um miech jao, iech weit 't. Intösse liekent de ganse gróp te zien weggeloupe. Wee wèt ouch wel um miech, meh dat zègke ze neet debij. Toch höb iech ummer gehoop totste ins zouws trökkoume, al waor 't mer um dat 'veurluipeg' op dien gebrukerspaasj.
Wie daan ouch, iech maak miech nog zörg euver get aanders. Veer höbbe allemaol jaorelaank artikele aongemaak die noets zien veerdeg gekoume en noe al jaorelaank haaf aofgemaak op hun oteurs te wachte ligke. Dat is noets de bedoeling vaan die categorie gewees en 't is ouch gein reclaam veur 't projek. Zelf bin iech begós mèt 't aofmake vaan mien artikele (boevaan eint al ach jaor op voltoejing wachde!) en dat bevèlt miech zier good. Zouw 't mesjiens 'n idee zien um dat ouch te doen? In die geval geit 't um de artikele Apollo-program, Evolutie, G-klasse staar, Antoni Gaudí, ISO 3166-1, Mars Science Laboratory, Ruimtetoerisme, Sintervaoskèrk, Spaceshuttleprogram, Staar, STS-135 en Universum.
Desnoeds wèl iech zelf wel vertrèkke, es de Limbörgse Wikipedia diech daomèt trökkrijg. Steinbach (euverlègk) 26 mrt 2014 18:17 (CET)[reageren]

All ok then? Nemo bis (euverlègk) 2 jul 2014 14:46 (CEST)[reageren]

Your admin status

Hello. I'm a steward. A new policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc.) was adopted by community consensus recently. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on wikis with no inactivity policy.   You meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for 2 years) on liwiki, where you are a bureaucrat and administrator. Since that wiki does not have its own administrators' rights review process, the global one applies.   If you want to keep your rights, you should inform the community of the wiki about the fact that the stewards have sent you this information about your inactivity. If the community has a discussion about it and then wants you to keep your rights, please contact the stewards at m:Stewards' noticeboard, and link to the discussion of the local community, where they express their wish to continue to maintain the rights, and demonstrate a continued requirement to maintain these rights.   We stewards will evaluate the responses. If there is no response at all after approximately one month, we will proceed to remove your administrative rights. In cases of doubt, we will evaluate the responses and will refer a decision back to the local community for their comment and review. If you have any questions, please contact us on m:Stewards' noticeboard.   Best regards, Rschen7754 17 aug 2014 23:30 (CEST)[reageren]