Dyskusja wikipedysty:Dušan Kreheľ

pl-0 Ta osoba nie rozumie języka polskiego (albo ma z nim olbrzymie trudności).

Slovenské Pravno

This article has no visible error:

• befor your bot
• after your bot edits

But I reverted your bot edits in other 85 articles (of total 1124 articles).

In Vysoká (powiat Bańska Szczawnica) yor bot confused sk:Vysoká (okres Banská Štiavnica) with sk:Vysoká nad Kysucou (150 km; different kraj). In others bot inserted errors connected with article references). In some cases your bot changed {{r}} template and missed 2nd and the next parameters.

I think you schould work with bot code to recognize if reference has one or more uses and where is definition of reference. ~malarz pl ^PISZ 00:07, 13 gru 2021 (CET)

@Malarz pl Slovenské Pravno – Look You a page on 1024x768px and the "photo gallery". The photo gallery is only as table, none wiki gallery element or template.

Bot, yes, under developing. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 19:20, 13 gru 2021 (CET)

Suché vrchy and others

These bot operations are unnecessary - they do not improve articles in any way. Do not do that again. Selso (dyskusja) 01:24, 20 gru 2021 (CET)

@Selso Really? So statistic on plwiki (from dump plwiki-20211201-pages-articles.xml.bz2) say that the double quotes are something better.

The statistic of <ref> name with(out) the quotation marks on plwiki

What	Count
All pages (All namespaces)	2 442 865
The pages with „wrong“ name „<ref>s“	185 596	~ 7%
The count of „<ref>s“	2 930 600
The count of wrong name „<ref>s“	748 363	~ 25%

Wrong „<ref> is <ref name=text>. Right „<ref> is <ref name="text">.

Another, I edit in source wiki code. Something better is that with the double quotes.

Hm, on hrwiki and srwiki none problem. On wiki the change was good for 2 people.

Ok, I was been stopped the changes.

✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 01:51, 20 gru 2021 (CET)

Both the Both the „<ref>“' and <ref> versions are valid. Editing articles to change „<ref>“ to <ref> is unnecessary. Thank you. Selso (dyskusja) 09:55, 20 gru 2021 (CET)

• [1] - What for? You broke format of infobox parameters (new line, space, pipe, name ...) and insert non-visible nbsp (on pl.wiki we do not use them, some tools change them to ASCII space). ~malarz pl ^PISZ 18:01, 16 sty 2022 (CET)

@Malarz pl The format – a style from hrwiki and hrwiki.

The clear char is not very popular, but the char is used in 15.07% times and on 11.63% pages with contra of the &nbsp; (in Main namespace, dump 20210101).✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 21:55, 16 sty 2022 (CET)

Ad:Lopašov

Ad:Lopašov

Why did you add |Radošovce]] after the zip code? From what I can see, you made the same mistake in other articles. I've already fixed it. The Polish (query) 19:12, 16 sty 2022 (CET)

@The Polish Thank for the report. I stopped the updates and then I fixed the error. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 21:55, 16 sty 2022 (CET)

Wierzbów and others

Removing footnotes is vandalism see Selso (dyskusja) 06:41, 2 kwi 2022 (CEST)

@Selso Thx for ur report. I will analyse all changes pages yesterday and I will repair. Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 10:21, 2 kwi 2022 (CEST)

Ok, the error is in older change of my bot. Wierzbów is fixed. Dušan Kreheľ (dyskusja) 10:34, 2 kwi 2022 (CEST)

Post office

Editing your bot is useful - updating infoboxes. But there is a problem. See post office. Is there a post office in the village of Prosiek? Slovak wikipedia reports: post office Liptovská Sielnica. It affects many villages Selso (dyskusja) 15:42, 2 kwi 2022 (CEST)

Unbreak space + Bot changes

Also any editors on pl-wiki has in it's own scripts deletion of unbreak-space. The main reason is, that this sign in not visible in code. Each language has its own rules of application non-breaking space, and believe me - there are a lot of places in the code where these spaces are used incorrectly. We cannot leave riddles to editors. Therefore, we remove them. On the other hand, html entities are untouched by us (as long as they are in the right places). But entities are visible and therefore can be controlled. And the sign in question cannot be controlled. Beno (dyskusja) 02:08, 3 kwi 2022 (CEST)

Croatian updates

Hello. I would like to notice that your bot has performed numerous incorrect edits in articles regarding Croatian municipalities and towns. Croatian banovinas are divided into općinas and grads. Grads can consist of numerous towns, villages, and localities. They are not cities per se, despite their names. Nonetheless, your bot treats grads as their capital cities: [2]. 46 186 is a population of Grad Varaždin, not Varaždin. Varaždin itself has around 38K inhabitants and the rest of Grad Varaždin's population lives elsewhere (Črnec Biškupečki, Donji Kućan, Gojanec, Gornji Kućan, Hrašćica, Jalkovec, Kućan Marof, Poljana Biškupečka, Zbelava). I am fully aware that, in some wikis, grads and their capitals are described within one article, but here we have it already separated. Could you please correct that? Greetings, Mathieu Mars (dyskusja) 16:08, 9 kwi 2022 (CEST)