Commons:Administrators/Requests/Docu 4: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(No difference)

Revision as of 20:32, 1 February 2011

Docu IV

Manet sitting sideways on chair

Vote

Docu (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 07:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

As I was told to do stuff myself rather than asking other volunteers to do it for me: here is my request. This way I can do protected edit requests myself, removing them from the current backlog. Other than that, I try to answer questions on help desk and I categorize primarily images around here (samples: sitting sideways on chair, centered tunnel perspective, west front of Chatsworth House). prev. req. --  Docu  at 07:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

  •  Oppose. Keeping all or any experience issues aside, the following makes me want to oppose. 1) You do not show clearly why you need these tools (protection/unprotection of a few files could easily be requested), or where you wish to work. 2) You are mostly focussing on RFA "retries" rather than improving yourself; you haven't met some/most of the requests by other admins at your previous requests. 3) IMHO, an administrator needs to be very friendly, which I do not see in your conversations with other editors. Rehman 09:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - User is clearly not going to misuse or abuse the tools; productivity overrides all other potential downfalls. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose no confidence. Multichill (talk) 14:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • oppose. Even in benign discourse you take a stubborn Ididnthearthat stance. No thanks. NVO (talk) 16:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose with regret. You are extremely active at Commons and quite familiar with administrative areas. You could certainly use the tools. However, adminship requires also good communication and this appears to be still a problem. In the last run for adminship, Herbythyme missed babel info (essential for multilingual projects as this), email access, and Multichill missed an archive of previous discussions. And I wonder why these obvious points (as they were already raised in the past) are not addressed. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments