Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Line 85: Line 85:
== May 30, 2014 ==
== May 30, 2014 ==
<gallery>
<gallery>
File:Hotel_The_Old_Inn_-_Hotel_Měšťák.jpg|{{/Promotion|The Hotel The Old Inn - Hotel Měšťák in Krumloc, Czech Republic. --[[User:High Contrast|High Contrast]] 22:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)|Good quality.--[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 04:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)}}
File:Hotel_The_Old_Inn_-_Hotel_Měšťák.jpg|{{/Promotion|The Hotel The Old Inn - Hotel Měšťák in Krumlov, Czech Republic. --[[User:High Contrast|High Contrast]] 22:36, 30 May 2014 (UTC)|Good quality.--[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 04:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)}}


File:Boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, from Tour St Jacques 2013-08.JPG|{{/Promotion| Boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris (by [[User:Zinneke|Zinneke]]) --[[User:Paris 16|Paris 16]] 22:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |ok, but please add the geolocation (would make sense for images like this). --[[User:Sputniktilt|Sputniktilt]] 09:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)<br>Done, thank Sputniktilt!--[[User:Paris 16|Paris 16]] 11:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)}}
File:Boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris, from Tour St Jacques 2013-08.JPG|{{/Promotion| Boulevard de Sébastopol, Paris (by [[User:Zinneke|Zinneke]]) --[[User:Paris 16|Paris 16]] 22:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC) |ok, but please add the geolocation (would make sense for images like this). --[[User:Sputniktilt|Sputniktilt]] 09:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)<br>Done, thank Sputniktilt!--[[User:Paris 16|Paris 16]] 11:02, 31 May 2014 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 14:43, 31 May 2014


Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 14:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
  • Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
  • Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
  • If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

May 31, 2014

May 30, 2014

May 29, 2014

May 28, 2014

May 27, 2014

May 26, 2014

May 25, 2014

May 24, 2014

May 23, 2014

May 22, 2014

May 21, 2014

May 20, 2014

May 19, 2014

May 18, 2014

May 17, 2014

May 16, 2014

May 10, 2014

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

  • To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
  • You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
  • The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.
Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
  • In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
  • Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add  Oppose and  Support if necessary.
  • Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
  • Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".


Consensual Review

File:Mondorff_Foyer_socio-éducatif_L'Altbach.jpg

  • Nomination Socio-cultural centre in Mondorff, France --Cayambe 08:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC).  Oppose Lots of noise or artefacts especially on the roof, on the wooden boards, and on the shadowed areas --A.Savin 13:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Sorry, but I would like to hear a second opinion here. --Cayambe 15:22, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Münster,_Wolbeck,_Wolbecker_Tiergarten,_Angel_--_2014_--_7129.jpg

  • Nomination Angel (river) in the Wolbecker Tiergarten in Wolbeck, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 16:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Reykholt 21:10, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
    Bit unsharp IMO. Mattbuck 20:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Fixed It's now a little bit sharper.--XRay 18:08, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Green shield bug (Palomena prasina).JPG

  • Nomination Green shield bug (Palomena prasina) --Charlesjsharp 09:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Not in focus. --Mattbuck 22:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
    other opinions pleae --Charlesjsharp 09:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Stift_Herzogenburg_Nordportal_01.JPG

  • Nomination Northern wing and portal of Herzogenburg Monastery --Uoaei1 21:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Oppose Blur and brightening haloes in the left half --A.Savin 11:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
     Info I uploaded a new improved version and ask for re-review. --Uoaei1 13:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Better, but I'd like further opinion --A.Savin 19:43, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Junonia_atlites_26052014.jpg

  • Nomination Junonia atlites. --JDP90 15:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Oppose This one seems a bit too soft to me --A.Savin 10:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
    The subject is sharp I think. May be you are right. But I don't want to change the status to discuss for my own nomination . --JDP90

No problem, let's put it to CR. --A.Savin 10:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Brooklyn Evening Wallabout Bay.JPG

  • Nomination Photograph of Wallabout Bay, Brooklyn USA --Sankarshansen 05:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Reykholt 21:29, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
    A bit soft, chromatic noise. Mattbuck 23:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Gullfoss rainbow.JPG

  • Nomination Gullfoss waterfall in Iceland in the summer --Reykholt 18:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Nice but poor level of detail considering the small image size (foreground, left part). --Kreuzschnabel 07:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose per Kreuzschnabel. --P e z i 19:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File:GulfossCanonInWinter.jpg

  • Nomination Gullfoss waterfall in Iceland --Reykholt 18:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Bit noisy but ok.# --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
    A slight blueish cast might be acceptable under the dark blue Island sky, but this kind of blue is just bad white balancing. (I could upload an improved version.) --Kreuzschnabel 07:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File:27450_Allermöher_Deich_311_(Hamburg-Allermöhe).jpg

  • Nomination Timber framed historic house in Hamburg-Allermöhe --Dirtsc 17:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Oppose - Blur around the edges. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
    Please let's take a look if the new version is good enough. --Dirtsc 19:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
    Now it's quite incredibly oversharpened. Mattbuck 22:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
    Please also take note of the posterisation effect in the top right corner. --Sitacuisses 18:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-60.jpg

  • Nomination bicycle rent station in Budapest --Ralf Roletschek 13:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  OpposeNice composition, but too much overexposure for me. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  SupportSky is of no importance for this image, and the shiny parts are that bright, i don’t see many blown parts. QI for me. --Kreuzschnabel 07:01, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose, per Mattbuck. --VT98Fan 19:28, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Kreuzschnabel. Exposure is adequate for the main subject. --Sitacuisses 20:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Rhododendron Blütenstand rosa.JPG

  • Nomination Better image than the old version which got declined here Mariofan13 15:38, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. Please provide English image description. --Uoaei1 06:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
     Oppose Sharpness and chroma noise --A.Savin 11:13, 26 May 2014 (UTC) CommentEnglish description provided. @A. Savin: What is blur except the background and where can you see noise? Mariofan13 13:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

File:2008-05-25 13 45 35 Iceland-Þingvellir.jpg

@Reykholt you must attribute the photographer --A.Savin 11:08, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose chromatic aberrations on shadows --A.Savin 11:11, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support The CA seems very slight or even nonexistent to me. Jakec 13:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support per Jacek. --Cayambe 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 09:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

File:14-05-06-budapest-RalfR-04.jpg

  • Nomination Budapest Keleti pu. station; Locomotive 431 --Ralf Roletschek 10:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. Small DoF, but IMO still QI. --XRay 06:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
    Mostly out of focus. --Mattbuck 21:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
     Support Low DOF, but ok --High Contrast 14:48, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Mattbuck and overexposed background, and purple CA top left --Christian Ferrer 15:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Core_Banks_-_Green_Anole_-_1.JPG

  • Nomination Animals of Core Banks, North Carolina: Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) --Jarekt 18:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --Cayambe 15:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
    Detail lost due to channel overexposure. --Mattbuck 21:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Militaergeographisches Institut Globus Wien DSC 10171w.jpg

  • Nomination Former Institute of Military Geography, facade detail, Vienna --P e z i 18:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Support Good quality. A bit soft, but difficult shot at 450mm --DXR 19:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC) Oppose for now. Is our poor earth so oval ? A correction is needed, IMO.--Jebulon 20:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks for review. New version uploaded. --P e z i 21:27, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Ophrys_insectifera_LC0346.jpg

  • Nomination Fly Orchid (Ophrys insectifera), Leutra valley near Jena, Thuringia, Germany --LC-de 11:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Parts of the plant are a bit unsharp. Jakec 12:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
    Not only unsharp, big parts of the plant aren't even on the picture!!!11eleven. The only valid question is, if the unsharp parts are important or disturbing. --LC-de 12:42, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Orange tip female (Anthocharis cardamines).jpg

  • Nomination Orange tip female butterfly (Anthocharis cardamines) --Charlesjsharp 21:21, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blur wingtip, blur head (!), noisy background. --Graphium 17:48, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Enough for QI. --Archaeodontosaurus 06:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Dodge_Dart_in_Isla_Margarita.jpg

  • Nomination Dodge Dart in Isla Margarita --Wilfredor 05:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --P e z i 10:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
    Significant noise. --Mattbuck 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:2014_Kłodzko,_most.JPG

  • Nomination Gothic Bridge in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 19:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion  Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 10:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC) Comment IMO image does not have the tilt, see notes Jacek Halicki 21:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
    A bit of blur/CA on left, and minor blur on right. Mattbuck 20:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)✓ DoneJacek Halicki 11:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
    Sorry, the blur/sharpening has left sort of after-images on the left. Mattbuck 20:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
    I disagree with Mattbuck, IMO picture is fine --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Tower in Taman Sari, 2014-05-19.jpg

  • Nomination Tower overviewing the bathing area, Taman Sari, Yogyakarta --Crisco 1492 08:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
    Overexposure and both sides leaning in Poco a poco 20:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
    Restitched and reworked.Crisco 1492 07:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    Better, but the overexposure is still too significant Poco a poco 20:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    Dropped the exposure by 0.2, and according to Lightroom there are now no blown highlights worth mentioning.Crisco 1492 06:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
    Not convinced, fact is that the details are gone. You can go for discussion if you like Poco a poco 20:11, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
    Have asked for a discussion and will upload proof of my statement.Crisco 1492 01:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion *This shows four areas which look like they have blown highlights (i.e. the areas with the greatest amount of light, and fairly plain textures), as well as what Lightroom finds blown (in red). The first three, the main parts of the structure and the focus of the image, have texture; the building is simply cleaner there, and the color of the roof tile is already a very pale cream (this can be confirmed by looking at any other image, including the decidedly under-exposed File:Taman Sari Yogyakarta 2009 panoramic.jpg). The last one, the steps, admittedly have more blown highlights, but they are secondary to the focus of the image and even then the blown area is not particularly large.Crisco 1492 10:19, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support --Moroder 11:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Cognac_16_Enseigne_Huissier_2014.jpg

File:Cognac 16 Enseigne Huissier 2014.jpg

  • Nomination Usher's sign ; Cognac, Charente, France. --JLPC 17:16, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Good quality. --VT98Fan 18:40, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
    May be a copyvio. --Crisco 1492 12:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support very good quality. --P e z i 09:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Which means nothing if the image is deleted as a violation of copyright. This is a great image... just maybe not free.Crisco 1492 10:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I trust that the CR problem will be solved; and if not: It's the same effort to delete a QI :-) --P e z i 17:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Except QI guideline #1 on the QIG page is "Images must be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license." An unintentional copyvio does not meet this criteria.Crisco 1492 00:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Until the FOP issue can be dealt with.Crisco 1492 00:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --VT98Fan 19:34, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Festiwal_Naadam_na_stepie_na_obrzeżach_Ułan_Bator_33.JPG

  • Nomination Naadam festival on the steppe, on the outskirts of Ulan Bator. Mongolia. Mongolian horses and riders. --Halavar 15:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality, LouiXXXII 09:37, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - noisy, too high contrast. Mattbuck 22:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
     Info You were right. I fixed those problems and I uploaded new version, hope it's better now. --Halavar 13:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
    You've gone from noisy to posterised, and the contrast and white balance problems are still apparent. Mattbuck 21:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes?   --Cayambe 09:22, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Krajobraz_w_Parku_Narodowym_Gorchi-Tereldż_33.JPG

  • Nomination Landscape. Gorkhi-Terelj National Park. Mongolia. --Halavar 22:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yellowish color cast. Looks more natural with white balance taken from bright clouds on the left edge. --Sitacuisses 08:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
You again with colours... Can you imagine, that not everywhere colours of landscape and sky looks the same? Especially in the end of the day? I have wrong time in my images from Mongolia, so this image was taken after 6 PM. If you ever have been in Mongolia, then you should know, what are the natural colours in that country. Hope to see your images soon (of course with proper, natural colours) :) --Halavar 17:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Please answer the questions I asked on your talk page, rather than make up lame excuses. There are plenty of realistic pictures of Mongolia available, and several persons told you that your colours are off. --Sitacuisses 19:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Oppose White balance problems and yellow channel satured --Wilfredor 17:06, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 13:18, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:P-konyaeva-2014-2013.jpg

  • Nomination Festive evening «We inherited the victory» in the «Ganshin manor» museum. --PereslavlFoto 16:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:21, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Flash too harsh IMO --Poco a poco 08:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent portrait, which makes that I can live with the flash harshness. --Cayambe 09:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - harsh flash and not particularly sharp. Mattbuck 10:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Cayambe 13:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Clapton-in-Gordano MMB 07 M5.jpg

  • Nomination The M5 in Clapton-in-Gordano. Mattbuck 06:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion
  •  Support Good quality. --Graphium 09:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Unbalanced composition, large parts lacking sufficient detail. --Sitacuisses 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
    The composition felt balanced to me, the idea of the photo is to have the motorway lit up and the rest only having reflected light. Mattbuck 16:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
    In a good night shot I'd expect some more detail in the darker parts. The picture's dynamics are concentrated to the right side; the left third is too dark and somehow useless. It would probably look better if the light lines would all start at the horizontal edge, not some of them at the right side and some at the bottom. The image also seems to be tilted, that's my impression confirmed by the arrows on the road signs. The subject is nothing special and easy to replicate; try again with some more daylight left or longer exposure time to get more overall detail. Finally, there are a few hotpixels. --Sitacuisses 05:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Some noise in the sky (see note). But its ok for me IMHO --Wilfredor 17:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support Great picture ! Jacek Halicki 09:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Support The traffic on the street could have been more busy ;-) But all in all a very good photograph. --High Contrast 14:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
    Unfortunately it was May, so the late night necessary for the light didn't lend itself to heavy traffic. Mattbuck 16:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --VT98Fan 19:33, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:András_Kállay-Saunders,_ESC2014_Meet_&_Greet_10 (crop 2).jpg

  • Nomination András Kállay-Saunders during a Meet & Greet at the Eurovision Song Contest 2014. --Abbedabb 17:13, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Discussion Perspective not done. --Cccefalon 05:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Perspective adjusted. --Abbedabb 09:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
    Crop not optimal, but ok for QI. --Cccefalon 12:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Croped photo. (And added old crop version next to this one) --Abbedabb 14:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
     Comment Late insertion is not possible. Has to be nominated as a new version. --Cccefalon 15:27, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
    While the new crop is a better photo, it is significantly more problematic copyright-wise. The old one was iffy about whether it passed COM:DM, but there is no way in hell this one does. As all QIs must be freely licensed, and this one cannot be so licensed, it cannot be promoted. Mattbuck 23:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Mattbuck.--Jebulon 19:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Now I've blurred the background really hard. --Abbedabb 09:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)