Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
Undo revision 206894361 by Мирослав Видрак (talk) |
|||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
File:Waldemarsudde_February_2016_04.jpg|{{/Promotion|Waldemarsudde, east facade of the main building. --[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] 12:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
File:Waldemarsudde_February_2016_04.jpg|{{/Promotion|Waldemarsudde, east facade of the main building. --[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] 12:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
||
File:Aschaffenburg,_Stiftsgasse_1-20160911-001.jpg|{{/Promotion|Aschaffenburg, Stiftsgasse 1. By [[User:Tilman2007]] --[[User:Berthold Werner|Berthold Werner]] 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Needs little additional crop at the right and down parts of the image. But only IMO.--[[User:Aeou|Aeou]] 11:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) |
File:Aschaffenburg,_Stiftsgasse_1-20160911-001.jpg|{{/Promotion|Aschaffenburg, Stiftsgasse 1. By [[User:Tilman2007]] --[[User:Berthold Werner|Berthold Werner]] 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Needs little additional crop at the right and down parts of the image. But only IMO.--[[User:Aeou|Aeou]] 11:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --[[User:Мирослав Видрак|Мирослав Видрак]] 17:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
||
File:Metro_SPB_Administration_Building.jpg|{{/Promotion|Saint Petersburg Metro Administration Building --[[User:Florstein|Florstein]] 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:Basotxerri|Basotxerri]] 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
File:Metro_SPB_Administration_Building.jpg|{{/Promotion|Saint Petersburg Metro Administration Building --[[User:Florstein|Florstein]] 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:Basotxerri|Basotxerri]] 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 17:48, 17 September 2016
Nominations
Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 08:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).
|
---|
September 17, 2016
-
- Nomination: Debki – the border post of the former border of the Second Republic of poland with the German Reich. --ArkadiuszZ 17:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lighthouse in Kolobrzeg --ArkadiuszZ 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Christ the King Monument in Swiebodzin, Marzec 2014 --ArkadiuszZ 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Собор Володимирський, Київ, Шевченка Тараса бульв., 20 --Мирослав Видрак 17:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Viscum album --Wikimatze 16:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Arnsberg Forest Nature Park --Wikimatze 16:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sandstone column in Dörfleins --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Green crab spider on metal railing --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Hausbock Käfer auf Nadelholz --Ermell 15:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Mühle Amanda in Kappeln --Milseburg 15:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Łomża, Plac Kościuszki 3, III Liceum Ogólnokształcące, dawne gimnazjum żeńskie z XIX/XX. --ArkadiuszZ 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: St. Michael Archangel Cathedral in Łomża (Poland) --ArkadiuszZ 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Zamoyski Palace in Kozlowka. --ArkadiuszZ 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Destroyed railway bridge on Mekhrenga River, Arkhangelsk region of the Russian Federation --AlixSaz 14:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bas-relief on the building. Shota Rustaveli Ave. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review The quality is OK but as I suppose that the bricks are of the same size it seems that there is some distortion. Perhaps you could correct it (by a horizontal correction)? --Basotxerri 14:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Done You were right, thanks for the hint. New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:47, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Men playing backgammon. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Monument in the park. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Fountain on the central square. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough for a Q1photo, also perspective good enough. IMO I would crop more of the top for emphasizing the fountain --Michielverbeek 15:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Independence Day of Georgia - May 26, 2014. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment I really don't like these motives --Tsungam 13:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I also don't like these motives, but that is not a good reason for declining. The bottom crop does not satisfy me, it's too narrow. The boy and the weapons are the main objects and the weapons are cut, so I decline this image --Michielverbeek 15:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC) - Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Independence Day of Georgia - May 26, 2014. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 13:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cuxhaven: Karl-Olfers-Platz --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion I think this is still acceptable but it seems a bit oversaturated to me. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cuxhaven: fishing boat on the Wadden Sea --A.Savin 12:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 12:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Angra do Heroismo from Monte Brasil (Azores, Portugal). --Kallerna 10:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Furnas do Enxofre in Terceira, Azores. --Kallerna 10:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Friedberg (Hessen), Gießener Straße, Befestigungstürme. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 09:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Should be perspective corrected, car removed + maybe another process (facade ism slightly overexposed) --A.Savin 12:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Granada, Alhambra, Casas del Partal --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Cordoba, roman bridge --Berthold Werner 09:41, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Waldemarsudde, Stockholm --ArildV 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Landsort lighthouse. --ArildV 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Aschaffenburg, Stiftsgasse 1. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 09:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs little additional crop at the right and down parts of the image. But only IMO.--Aeou 11:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 17:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Petersburg Metro Administration Building --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:08, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House at Beringa Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House at Odoevskogo Street in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Sharp enough, perspective good enough, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus MAZ-203.085 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:06, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus NefAZ-5299-30-32 in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roadside chapel on Droszkowska Pass --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church in Stronie Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Saint Bartholomew in Skrzynka 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:45, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Krzyżnik, Bialskie Mountains, Sudes --Jacek Halicki 08:44, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Florstein 08:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross in Trier, Germany. --Palauenc05 08:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cows,free roaming on the pastures of the Gorbea mountain range; Cross of Gorbea. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 12:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock of Iñiger in the Gorbea mountain range; view over the Alavese Plains. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Perhaps a bit hazy but altough a good view. --Milseburg 15:26, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape on the Mairulegorreta trail to Gorbea summit; beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 08:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Landscape on the Mairulegorreta trail to Gorbea summit; beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain. Info The inclination is the right one, really! --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Summit of Gorbea, summit cross. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 08:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion GQ --Palauenc05 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Церква Св.Параскеви (дер.), Белз, вул.Січових Стрільців, 48 --Мирослав Видрак 07:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Needs tilt correction, precise category --A.Savin 12:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Not enough quality for a Q1photo. Main object is not detailed enough and the top is a bit overexposed; the focus is not good. Leaves in the background have got a white part and this might be caused because of having a dirty lense.--Michielverbeek 06:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Keshav Narayan Chowk-Patan Museum- Patan Durbar --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. IMO it's overexposed at the roof and it needs perspective correction. --XRay 06:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Roof of the City Hall in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Buldern manor, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:52, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pont d'Occitanie (bridge) over the Orb River in Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Canal du Midi, close to the Pont-Canal. Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 05:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Argyreia hirsuta --Jkadavoor 05:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Park after a blizzard. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:28, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mining equipment, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mummelgrummel 04:05, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tom Miller Stable & Ice House, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Methodist Church, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 05:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kitchen interior, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Urch house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination House forge and Bodner house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lobnig granary (historic cereal store), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hanebauer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Herb garden next to the Hanebauer house, open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose sorry, but it is overexposed, not fixable as the leaves have burned out --Christian Ferrer 05:25, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Done It is unfair of you, @Christian Ferrer: , not to concede me the possibility of cropping out the insignificant upper part with the objected burned out leaves. Please, pay a second look at the photo now.--Johann Jaritz 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC) no, sorry, there are too much areas of pure white instead of the green color of the leaves and grass Christian Ferrer 07:48, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Well, then it is sealed. --Johann Jaritz 08:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC) The issue was not specially at top but in the whole image for me, the crop is not needed --Christian Ferrer 15:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Narayanhiti Palace Museum which long served as residence and principal workplace of the reigning Monarch of Kingdom of Nepal.It was built by king Mahendra in 1961 under the design of Californian architect Benjamin Polk. After 2006 revolution, this royal palace is turned into a public museum, Kathmandu, Nepal --Suraj Belbase 02:40, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Comment it need to be tilted, the perspectives corrected (verticals must be verticals), and the big dustspot removed --Christian Ferrer 05:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
September 16, 2016
-
- Nomination Le Pigeonnier du château du Sart Villeneuve-d'Ascq, France. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination La villa Gabrielle et son parc, quartier d'Annappes, Villeneuve d'Ascq Nord, France. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moats on the right wing of the Château de Flers Villeneuve d'Ascq, Nord, France. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 20:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: St. Peter Church of Flers-Bourg in Villeneuve d'Ascq North, France.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Saint Wulmar church and the klockhuis in Eecke, Nord, France. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 20:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque figures (13th Century) at the outside of the apsis of the parish Church Schöngrabern, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Maulavern In Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel), Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 15:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Pudelek 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the "holy stone", municipality Mitterretzbach, Weinviertel, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion nice --Pudelek 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The pasture Resciesa in Gröden - Up front swiss pine trees (pinus cembra) and juniper (Juniperus communis subsp. alpina) on Porphyry rocks - The juniper plants are partially extirpated to keep the pasture. --Moroder 15:10, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 15:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hiking guidepost in Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The part with the sunspot seems a little overexposed, do you think you could tone it down a bit and bring out some more detail in that area? W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Just what you said: things you oversee in your own pictures. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:20, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Perfect! Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sheep in the beech woods. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 17:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Oketa, beeches and ferns. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The sun glints on the leaves in trees (not the ferns) are a little disturbing. Think you could tone them down a bit? Love the misty mountain in the distance. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Done This was good example to learn to use the adjustment brush in Lightroom. Thank you! --Basotxerri 08:51, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
It's the little details that does it. Very nice now. Good quality. --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape in Álava, summit of Anboto, beeches. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice, but the lower right corner with the dark part of the trees and the stone needs a bit of noise reduction. W.carter 20:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Done You make me work! However you're absolutely right as the image hadn't had any NR at all. Good observation! --Basotxerri 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
We all work hard to get our pics to look their best. Good quality and excellent striking composition. I would support this if I happened to see it at FPC. (That is why I checked even more thoroughly.) ;) --W.carter 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basque mountain horse,free roaming on the pastures of the Gorbea mountain range. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 14:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination IX station of the cross. Jesus falls the third time. --Moroder 14:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Purple Nymphaeaceae at TBGRI, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. --Shishirdasika 11:25, 6 Aug 2016 (IST)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosque Okba minaret night view --IssamBarhoumi 13:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline The down crop is too tight. Motion blur in the upper and right parts of the image. --Aeou 15:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mãrius Romanus Mausoleum in Kairouan --IssamBarhoumi 13:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The main object is in the shadow, which is a pity, but the quality is OK. --Basotxerri 15:52, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mãrius Romanus Mausoleum in Kairouan --IssamBarhoumi 13:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 13:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Handelsschule Am Lämmermarkt in Hamburg-St. Georg, keramisches Objekt auf den Pfosten der südlichen Eingrenzungspergola. By User:Ajepbah --Berthold Werner 12:57, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pfalzgrafenstein Castle, seen from the viewpoint "Blücherblick" on the Rheinburgenweg Trail. --Milseburg 12:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ornbau, Altmühlbrücke. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 12:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 16:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weikersheim, Marktplatz 1, Ev. Stadtkirche. By User:Tilman2007 --Berthold Werner 12:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 12:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Cordoba, roman bridge --Berthold Werner 11:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --ElBute 11:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spain, Cordoba, Calahorra Tower --Berthold Werner 11:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Auditorium in Jameos del Agua. Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain. --ElBute 10:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Marghiloman mansion in Fundeni, Zărnești commune, Buzău County, Romania --Andrei Stroe 09:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The restaurant in Crâng park, Buzău, Romania --Andrei Stroe 09:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Weak Support Good quality. Shadows could be brighter. Car in the front is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Calvinist chuch in Turia, Covasna County, Romania --Andrei Stroe 09:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 10:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Strefi hill, from Lycabettus, Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 09:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Buildings are leaning to the right, especially in the right part of the image. --Milseburg 12:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC) @Milseburg: You are right, I hope it is good now, Done, Thank you for opinion.--Jebulon 13:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Support Successful improvement. --Milseburg 18:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slag heaps in Stronie Śląskie Wieś --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oranje-Nassau coat of arms in Stronie Śląskie 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Oranje-Nassau coat of arms in Stronie Śląskie 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Janowiec, Śnieżnik Mountains, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 09:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Onuphrius chapel in Stronie Śląskie --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Grafenegg Castle, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 08:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grafenegg Castle, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 08:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Grafenegg Castle, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 08:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Since it is a central composition I'd suggest a correction also of the horizontal lines --Moroder 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint --Uoaei1 18:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. Please give to the single candidates a different description. That makes work easiear to reviewers to identify the images --Moroder 20:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Grafenegg Castle, Lower Austria --Uoaei1 08:17, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Since it is a central composition I'd suggest a correction also of the horizontal lines --Moroder 17:37, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6 Franka Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 07:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn I withdraw my nomination--Aeou 09:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2 Dudaieva Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 07:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4 Tershakovtsiv Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 07:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 20 Ruska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 07:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cape of Kaliakra, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madara Rider, National historical archaeological reserve, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock-hewn Churches of Basarbovo, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Looks OK. --Peulle 07:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock-hewn Churches of Basarbovo, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rock-hewn Churches of Basarbovo, Bulgaria --Poco a poco 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: церква св. Ольги і Єлизавети, Львів, Кропивницького пл., 1 --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Комплекс Києво-Печерської лаври (Національний заповідник Києво-Печерська Лавра), Київ, Лаврська вул., 9, 15 --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. --A.Savin 12:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Комплекс Михайлівського Золотоверхого монастиря, Київ, Трьохсвятительська вул., 6 --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Holy Mountains Monastery (complex of the architecture monuments of national significance). Sviatohirsk, Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine. By User:Brizhnichenko --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Very good but leaning to the right.--Ermell 07:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Odessa Opera and Ballet Theater (1887, Büro Fellner & Helmer, architectural monument of the national significance №549). Odesa, Ukraine. By User:Brizhnichenko --Мирослав Видрак 05:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Pont Vieux de Béziers mirrored in the Orb River. Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 04:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The railway bridge over the Orb River in Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 04:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 04:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citadel in Wesel, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 04:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jewish Cemetery in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 04:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Central Park after a blizzard. --King of Hearts 03:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion I`m grateful, that you show us the most charming sides of New York. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Autumn foliage in New York Botanical Garden. --King of Hearts 03:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Beautiful. Wish I could walk that charming alley. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panorama of Hoboken Terminal. --King of Hearts 03:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion I simply like your photographs. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mining equipment, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Very convincing and Wow! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Methodist Church, Bodie. --King of Hearts 03:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Stunning. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basantapur Darbar Kshetra UNESCO World Heritage Sites. By User:Razz.999 --Bijay chaurasia 03:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose tilted on right + perspectives, not fixable without a crop of people in foreground --Christian Ferrer 04:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sesiidae --Vengolis 02:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ipomoea pes-caprae --Vengolis 02:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Trithemis aurora --Vengolis 02:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Asilidae with prey --Vengolis 02:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Antmimicking spider (Myrmarachne) --Vengolis 02:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacristan house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skorjanz barn (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Steiner granary (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kramer house (historic farmhouse), open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Double hay rack, formerly used for drying and storing hay, open air museum, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 01:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Independence Day of Georgia - May 26, 2014. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 00:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support --Christian Ferrer 04:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motsameta monastery - church. Motsameta, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 00:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lado Meskhishvili State Drama Theatre. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 00:21, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the cathedral of O Funchal. -54 --Lmbuga 00:11, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
September 15, 2016
-
- Nomination Husqvarna Automower 308 with track marks in lawn. --W.carter 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion Oppose Sorry, bad composition: subject unaccountably small. --Lmbuga 00:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment The subject was not only the automower but the tracks it left in the lawn. But since I obviously failed to communicate that with the picture, I can understand why you decided to decline it. W.carter 07:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Support Sorry, in this case, I disagree. This is not a product image of the mower, but a photo of the device in its habitat. IMO, this is OK for a QI. However others may think differently, let's see. --Basotxerri 09:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
* Comment The mower moves in a random "bump and turn" pattern over the lawn and I thought this photo would illustrate this since the track marks were so visible, not sure I succeeded though. W.carter 11:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two stacks of silage bales. --W.carter 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion There is the presence of some noise, especially on the left bales, perhaps you could try to a bit of addional NR. By the way, I think that this can get better if you lower the highlights and brighten the shadows a bit (as a suggestion). --Basotxerri 16:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks!! You were absolutely right. New version uploaded. Better? Sometimes I think I'm partially blind when it comes to my own photos, missing things I would easily spot in others'. ;) That's why these reviews are so great, you get a second pair of fresh eyes. Much appreciated! W.carter 20:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Better! And good quality. --Basotxerri 09:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three tiers of silage bales. --W.carter 23:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion In first instance I got doubts about the perspective, but I don't see anything rong. Photo is also sharp enough for Q1quality --Michielverbeek 04:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The Parish Church Of St Peter. By User:Michael Coppins --Lewis Hulbert 21:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review The picture is fine but the description should be a bit more than just a few words and a tag. A reader should not have to go back through the categories to find out where the church is located or even which country it's located in, there are lots of "St Peter" churches. Please fix that and I'll mark this for QI. --W.carter 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Francisco Fulgêncio Andrade. Funchal. Madeira. Portugal. -56 --Lmbuga 20:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1 Stryiska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 20:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Picture is upsampled (more pixels than a Nikon D5100 provide), this is full no-go for me, sorry --A.Savin 00:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC) These photo was made of two parts.--Aeou 01:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Added template {{Panorama}}.--Aeou 12:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 6 Zelena, 2 Rustaveli Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 4 Brativ Rohatyntsiv Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Picture is upsampled (more pixels than a Nikon D5100 provide), this is full no-go for me, sorry --A.Savin 00:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC) It was not upsampling. Added template {{Panorama}}. It was made of three photos.--Aeou 12:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 Lychakivska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Picture is upsampled (more pixels than a Nikon D5100 provide), this is full no-go for me, sorry --A.Savin 00:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC) It was not upsampling. Added template {{Panorama}}. It was made of two photos.--Aeou 12:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 17 Pekarska Street. Lviv, Ukraine.--Aeou 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Picture is upsampled (more pixels than a Nikon D5100 provide), this is full no-go for me, sorry --A.Savin 00:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC) It was not upsampling. Added template {{Panorama}}. It was made of two photos.--Aeou 12:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Latvian Academy of Sciences building --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rīgas Starptautiskā Lidosta --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality -- Spurzem 19:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rundāle Palace, Latvia --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline The pot and its stand are not sharp enough, I guess that it is the intended focus of the picture even if the floor is really beautiful. Sorry. W.carter 21:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Daugavgrīva, Riga, Latvia --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Normal every-day scene, I think it would be better if you cropped out that half front of the yellow car (see note). If you could also tone up a bit more detail in the clouds, that would be great. W.carter 21:06, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amphitheatre El Jem Front Entrance --Fatma Hamdi 16:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline ONLY 5 nomination per day per user to be reviewed, please. --W.carter 16:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City of El Jem saw from the 3rd level of galeires theathre --Fatma Hamdi 16:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline ONLY 5 nomination per day per user to be reviewed, please. --W.carter 16:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grand chapiteau corinthien --Fatma Hamdi 16:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Tilted, out of focus ... for a picture to be QI, it needs to be a lot better --Peulle 16:30, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination forêt de khroufa, Nefza Béja Tunisie --Fatma Hamdi 16:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline ONLY 5 nomination per day per user to be reviewed, please. --W.carter 16:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Le parc national d'El Feija est un parc national tunisien situé dans la délégation de Ghardimaou, à environ 200 kilomètres à l'ouest de Tunis et à une cinquantaine de kilomètres à l'ouest de Jendouba. --Fatma Hamdi 16:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, loss of detail by noise reduction. Not sufficient for a QI. --Basotxerri 20:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tabarka, Jendouba, Tunisie --Fatma Hamdi 16:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Poor quality. Very bad picture--Lmbuga 20:47, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination site archéologique tunisien situé à trente kilomètres au sud de Tunis sur la route menant à Zaghouan --Fatma Hamdi 16:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, noise, not sufficient for a QI. --Basotxerri 20:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Réserve de Jbel Khroufa Nefza , Tabarka, Tunisia --Fatma Hamdi 16:06, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Foreground is disturbing. champignons aren't realy in focus. Poor DoF. Overexposed areas. Sorry, poor quality IMO--Lmbuga 20:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heligoland: view of the cliffs --A.Savin 15:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Track at Campo de los Palacios to the Olarizu allotments, a few minutes before a thunderstorm. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 15:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Picris Echioides at the Botanical Garden of Olarizu. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Cats looks fine to me. Good quality. --W.carter 16:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
...but it wasn't a Sonchus, it was Picris, error by copy & paste... --Basotxerri 16:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
That's ok. I ignored what you had written in the nomination box, I guessed you had made some kind of mistake there. It is only what's on the file's page that is important and that seemed to fit just fine, you had probably just fixed it when I looked at the page, except for the formatting of the latin names (should always be written in italics) but I fixed that for you. ;) W.carter 16:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake of Olarizu at the Botanical Garden. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 15:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Drinking fountain and wash house in Murua. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 15:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel of San Antonio in Murua. Álava, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 15:00, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --A.Savin 15:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination VI station of the cross. Veronica wipes the face of Jesus. --Moroder 14:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Timoleague Friary: Window of main church --Imehling 14:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Lighthouse on Pellworm --Milseburg 13:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted CW little bit. --Halavar 14:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done You was watching very closely. Considering the flagpole I´ve rotaded the image 0.6° ccw. --Milseburg 16:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 00:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old Church on Pellworm --Milseburg 13:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:02, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Google Cardboard. By User:Evan-Amos --Lewis Hulbert 13:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Aeou 15:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms in Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. -33 --Lmbuga 12:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 14:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC) As for living species, you should identify this before a promotion (easy).--Jebulon 15:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Well, I've mercy on you. Done .--Jebulon 15:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thanks Jebulon. And thanks Hubertl--Lmbuga 19:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: I think is good qualiti of spider flower cultivar picture --AfroBrazilian 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Good picture quality of Ichneumon suspiciosus --AfroBrazilian 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 12:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The panathenaïc stadium, as seen from the Lycabettus hill. Here took place the first Olympic Games of the Modern Era in 1896. Athens, Greece.--Jebulon 08:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ruin of the chapel Altenstein --Ermell 08:29, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lado Meskhishvili State Drama Theatre. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Archangel Church. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kutaisi Great Synagogue. Kutaisi, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Motsameta monastery. Motsameta, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Chapel. Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination John of Nepomuk statue in Trzebieszowice --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Folwark in Żelazno, dovecote 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Folwark in Żelazno, dovecote 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bialskie Mountains, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Anne church in Nowa Ruda --Jacek Halicki 08:16, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Halavar 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hut Weber, Bonn --AKirch-Bonn 07:45, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Blown sky. --Peulle 08:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Будинок прибутковий, Київ, Хмельницького Богдана вул., 33/34 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Not bad, but needs perspective correction + a meaningful file name --A.Savin 15:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Костел монастиря бернардинів (Троїцький кафедральний собор)(мур.), Луцьк, вул. Л. Українки, 60 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Вежа (мур.), Белз, пл.Л.Українки --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: церква Преображенська, Львів, Краківська, 21 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Brunnen am Kaiserplatz, Bonn --AKirch-Bonn 07:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunately it's way too soft and there is overexposure on the fountains. Also, some chromatic aberrations --A.Savin 15:17, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Es ist wirklich interessant zu sehen welche Bilder als "Quality Images" benannt werden und welche nicht. Teilweise gewinnt man den Eindruck das dies in Abhängigkeit der Person geschieht. --AKirch-Bonn 13:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Comment @AKirch-Bonn: Meine Bewertung kann sich allein schon deswegen nicht von deiner Person abhängen, weil ich dich nicht kenne. Geh von guten Absichten aus, bitte. --A.Savin 14:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New crematorium, concentration camp of Dachau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jewish memorial, concentration camp of Dachau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Commander's office, concentration camp of Dachau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Jewish memorial, concentration camp of Dachau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Prisoners' barracks, concentration camp of Dachau, Germany --Poco a poco 07:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Good flower quality of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 06:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Good flower quality of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 06:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. W.carter 12:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Good flower quality of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 06:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. W.carter 12:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hermann von Widerhofer (1832-1901), physician, bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Triton and Najad fountain C, Artist: Hugo Haerdtl. This is one of four fountains at the Maria-Theresien-Square in Vienna --Hubertl 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Keystone, at the left side to the Maria-Theresian-Square, Museum of Natural History --Hubertl 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Highway A23, seen from Monte Laa, Absberg tunnel, Vienna, Favoriten --Hubertl 06:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tree reflection in the Orb River, Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 04:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pont Vieux de Béziers mirrored in the Orb River. Béziers, Hérault, France. --Christian Ferrer 04:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion An excellent composition which is sharp enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 05:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City Hall in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:08, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord in Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Parish and pilgrimage church Assumption Day, Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
September 14, 2016
-
- Nomination PlayStation 4 with DualShock 4 (by Evan-Amos) --Gamingforfun365 01:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. I wish photos of places and buildings had as good descriptions as the devices in these photos! --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xbox One console set (by Evan-Amos) --Gamingforfun365 01:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wii U console and gamepad (by Takimata) --Gamingforfun365 01:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wii console with a Wiimote (by Evan-Amos) --Gamingforfun365 01:36, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Xbox One Kinect (by Evan-Amos) --Gamingforfun365 01:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 10:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dom Jean Pateau, abbot of Fontgombault --Olivier LPB 22:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Face is dark and just below sharpness line for a portrait with some blur on the head gear. --W.carter 11:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Medersa Ben Youssef. By User:Elena Tatiana Chis --Reda benkhadra 22:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a better description of what is in the picture plus more categories. W.carter 09:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: Done --Reda benkhadra 22:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Good quality. --W.carter 09:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Medersa Ben Youssef. By User:Elena Tatiana Chis --Reda benkhadra 22:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Needs a bit of perspective adjustment and better description of what is in the picture plus more categories. W.carter 09:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: Done --Reda benkhadra 14:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but you only fixed the description, the perspective still needs to be corrected. W.carter 16:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: How ? --Reda benkhadra 22:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
You use a photo processing program like Adobe Photoshop or you can download a program called Gimp free online (just search for Gimp). With that you can make vertical lines straight and not tilting. Look at the before and after versions at the bottom of this picture and you will see what I mean. W.carter 08:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Medina of Essaouira. By User:Elena Tatiana Chis --Reda benkhadra 22:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Needs a bit of perspective adjustment and better description of what is in the picture plus more categories. W.carter 09:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: Done --Reda benkhadra 14:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but you only fixed the description, the perspective still needs to be corrected. W.carter 16:40, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: How ? --Reda benkhadra 22:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Look at previous pic. W.carter 08:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ait-Ben-Haddou. By User:Elena Tatiana Chis --Reda benkhadra 22:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Needs a better description. W.carter 09:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zeche Zollern: Maschinenhalle am Tag der Neueröffnung nach 9-jähriger Renovierung. By User:Rainer Halama --Smial 22:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Wrong focus (not on the machines, but on the glass in background), and enormous CA. Sorry.--Jebulon 09:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination night view of Mosque Okba in Kairouan --IssamBarhoumi 22:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. Lights are posterized, not sharp enough with little detail in the stonework, compressed people due to insufficient work at perspective adjustment. --W.carter 10:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination inside view of Mosque Mohamed Bey in Tunis --IssamBarhoumi 22:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline You already nominated this image few hours before. Sorry. --Aeou 08:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Serifos reservoir. --C messier 13:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crest of the dam at the waterfalls of Nybrufossen in Kongsberg.--Peulle 21:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Not the sharpest but enough for me. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Nybrufossen ("New bridge falls") in Kongsberg.--Peulle 21:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion The houses and shores of the rapid are a bit dark. Think you can brighten just them without doing anything to that beautiful sky? W.carter 10:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done You make a good point. I used tone mapping to lighten the shadows by +25. What do you think?--Peulle 16:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Much better, that made the pic "come alive". Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 19:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Thanks for your review. :)--Peulle 20:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bugsky Lane in Saint Petersburg --Florstein 17:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A 1904 waterworks station in Vrhnika, Slovenia. --Yerpo 17:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Shouldn't the door be vertical? Poco a poco 18:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
There was a bit of tilt which I corrected now, but no, the walls of this structure aren't entirely vertical. --Yerpo 19:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination A 1904 waterworks station in Vrhnika, Slovenia. --Yerpo 17:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Escudo de Fernando de Aragón, Duque de Calabria, en la Alquería de Albors de Valencia --Rafesmar 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Quality is good but the categories are not, can you please add some more specific (what is that coat of arms,...)? Poco a poco 18:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
I just added some more specific categories: thank you!!--Rafesmar 22:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Escudo de Fernando de Aragón, Duque de Calabria, en la Alquería de Albors de Valencia --Rafesmar 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long exposure night shot of Tower Bridge and river Thames --Rafesmar 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Photo is fine but the file need a much better description, in words, than just the monument tag. Fix this and I'll mark it as QI. W.carter 10:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: thank you --Rafesmar 15:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Now it is really a QI. The proper documentation is just as important as the pic quality. Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 16:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long exposure night shot of White Tower and river Thames --Rafesmar 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Photo is fine but the file need a much better description, in words, than just the monument tag. Fix this and I'll mark it as QI. --W.carter 10:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: thank you --Rafesmar 15:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 16:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long exposure night shot of St Paul Cathedral, Millenium Bridge and river Thames --Rafesmar 17:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Photo is fine but the file need a much better description, in words, than just the monument tag. Fix this and I'll mark it as QI. W.carter 10:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Done: thank you --Rafesmar 16:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Good quality. --W.carter 16:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vakabulli Beach, Riga, Latvia --Ralf Roletschek 13:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Minor unsharpness on the right but OK. --King of Hearts 05:13, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arches next to the amphitheatre, El Jem, Tunisia --Poco a poco 12:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion A bit on the bright side, but actually not overexposed. Good quality. --W.carter 10:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Monument to Peter Ellis Eyton at St. Saeran's church, Llanynys, Denbighshire, North Wales is a Grade 1 listed building. In 2015 a £4.5 million project came to an end, preserving this church. The motto at the bottom of the CoA is that of Humphrey Lhuyd burried in nearby church. --Llywelyn2000 11:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Comment Looks good enough for QI but for a slight CCW tilt. I suggest a small CW tilt correction before promotion. :)--Peulle 12:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Rhododendron in mountains by Bonna Mistress --Anntinomy 08:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please add appropriate categories (what and where) --A.Savin 09:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Dahlia flowers with good composition --AfroBrazilian 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. Also, please do not write that it is a "good quality image" until it has been reviewed as such. W.carter 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. W.carter 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. W.carter 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC) ok for me with a tighter crop --Hubertl 10:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Please provide a better subcategory, the present one is too wide. W.carter 10:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: This is good quality image of Dahlia cultivar --AfroBrazilian 08:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC) ok for me with a tighter crop --Hubertl 10:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Basilique de Damous El-Karita, découverte par le Père Delattre, La Rotande vue du coté des escaliers ouest --Aymen FANTAR 08:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Vue de l'ouest de laBasilique de Damous El-Karita, découverte par le Père Delattre --Aymen FANTAR 08:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Marianne Road, Bialskie Mountans, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination internal view of the Mosque Mohamed Bey in Tunis --IssamBarhoumi 07:40, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Lack of details. Especially down part of the image. Sorry. --Aeou 08:25, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Factory building of the "Red October" confectionery on Bersenevskaya Embankment in Moscow. By User:Fil ula --Brateevsky 07:25, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Christian Doppler (1803-1853), bust (marble) in the Arkadenhof of the University of Vienna --Hubertl 06:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)* Comment The image quality is good, but I think you should crop it a bit tighter. Right now there is a disturbing object (another column) to the left, and you're cutting off parts of the pedestal text, so I think you can cut the text out completely).--Peulle 12:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Technicaly good quality, but an unfortunate cut through the inscription. All or nothing would be my recommendation. --Milseburg 12:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC) * Comment new crop as recommended. Thanks for review. --Hubertl 16:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Gets my vote.--Peulle 19:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Support Yes, mine also. --Milseburg 13:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination City Hall in Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:28, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Perspective correction needed --A.Savin 09:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Fixed Sorry, you're right. Forgotten. Now it's fixed. --XRay 16:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality --A.Savin 15:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
September 13, 2016
-
- Nomination Fiat Uno parked in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 00:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion It's a bit dirty. -- Spurzem 19:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry but I can't solve that issue Ezarate 22:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
We need pictures of dirty cars as well as long as the photo is good. ;) But the picture needs some perspective adjustment, wall are leaning, and remove the CA. W.carter 10:52, 15 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 00:27, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 09:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Triumphal Arch of Caracalla at Volubilis Archaeological Site. By User:GKIP --Reda benkhadra 21:52, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Imo it needs correction of vertical lines and also of horizontal lines since it is a central composition --Moroder 14:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Une mosquée de Marrakech. By User:Pitchoon76 --Reda benkhadra 21:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Grande Mosquée de Casablanca- intérieur toit ouvert. By User:Pitchoon76 --Reda benkhadra 21:10, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Isiwal 20:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Good but it needs a perspsective correction and probably a tilt Poco a poco 20:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Done, Thanks for review, Poco a poco! --Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 20:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Still tilted in ccw direction Poco a poco 19:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC) ok, another try. Thanks for reviewing, Poco a poco. --Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 19:48, 14 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria (Weinviertel). By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Isiwal 20:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Amphitheatre of El Jem, Tunisia --Poco a poco 20:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Dún Eochla Interior - Inishmore / Ireland --Imehling 19:09, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lismore Castle, Ireland, County Waterford --Imehling 18:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment The grass surface is not even. Please fine-tune the stitching process & try again. Otherwise the pic is quite good. --Jacek79 19:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC) - Review Done --Imehling 21:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lismore Castle, Ireland, County Waterford --Imehling 18:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A pond near Jeziórko 3 --Kroton 18:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: A pond near Jeziórko 4 --Kroton 18:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View from Latvian Academy of Sciences building --Ralf Roletschek 16:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Horizon and vertical lines (edges of houses) are crooked, this cound easily be fixed. --Superbass 18:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC) The horizon is corrected, which was wrong. Vertical lines have to run to the vanishing point, because the camera is tilted. --Ralf Roletschek 19:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: Source of mineral water, opened in 1823 Nelyubin AP Medical Park, Yessentuki --AlixSaz 14:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Hertz’sche Halle (Bonn) --AKirch-Bonn 10:28, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose In my opinion, at least, red color and orange are oversaturated. The detail is not good. Blurry IMO. Not QI IMO. In my opinion, wires are disturbing--Lmbuga 00:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Konrad Adenauer head (Bonn) --AKirch-Bonn 10:23, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Spain, Granada, Palace of Charles V. --Berthold Werner 08:51, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: House in Młynowiec 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Very nice picture, but please provide a geo tag and a bit more info in the description so that whoever sees the pic don't have to back down through the categories just to find out where the village is situated. W.carter 19:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: House in Młynowiec 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Same as the previous version. W.carter 19:42, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gelati Monastery. Gelati, Tkibuli Municipality, Imereti, Georgia. --Halavar 08:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Villa Carlotta --Hamster28 07:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
The sky is overexposed, is there a way to get back the detail reducing the highlights? Poco a poco 20:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Villa Carlotta --Hamster28 07:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pasupatinath Temple from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side --Bijay chaurasia 06:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pashupatinath Temple Area --Bijay chaurasia 06:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pasupatinath Temple area from the bank of Bagmati river-Eastern side --Bijay chaurasia 06:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality and good description. --W.carter 23:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View of Mosque Mohamed Bey's Domes --IssamBarhoumi 05:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of dar Cherif --IssamBarhoumi 05:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: View of dar Cherif --IssamBarhoumi 05:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Central view of Patan Museum. --Bijay chaurasia 03:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Very unfortunate crop. This would have worked if you had only moved the camera a bit down and to the right. The small pavillion with it's statues is far more important than the cloud you tried to get in the picture. --W.carter 23:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
September 12, 2016
-
- Nomination: Centrosema Pubescens Thiruvananthapuram, India --Shishirdasika 12:59, 12 September 2016 (IST)
- Review Comment Sharpness should be better, DoF too. The filesize seems to be very small. 100% JPEG/no compression? --XRay 15:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moskauer Vorort in Riga, Lettland --Ralf Roletschek 10:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The head of a Siamese crocodile. --A,Ocram 09:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Karnak temple complex --Hamerani 09:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
The top crop is far too tight, can you offer another one? Poco a poco 16:25, 12 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Karnak temple complex --Hamerani 09:07, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Spain, Granada, the former convent of San Francisco, now the parador in the Alhambra --Berthold Werner 07:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Needs maybe a crop above ?--Jebulon 09:09, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done --Berthold Werner 15:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Spain, Granada, the former convent of San Francisco, now the parador in the Alhambra --Berthold Werner 07:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Karel Hynek Mácha in Petřín Park, Prague --SimcaCZE 07:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Insufficient quality. There is a lot of CA in the trees, some of the plants are overexposed and blown, most of the picture is too grainy and there is too liuttle detail in the statue. Much of this could have been avoided if you had done a tighter shot of the statue, now even a crop can't save it. Sorry --W.carter 23:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Amphitheatre of El Jem, Tunisia --Poco a poco 06:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Still a lot of fringes left but nice work so far.--Ermell 06:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Fixed Poco a poco 16:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Amphitheatre of El Jem, Tunisia --Poco a poco 06:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Still a lot of fringes left but nice work so far.--Ermell 06:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
September 11, 2016
-
- Nomination Amsterdam royal palace. --C messier 10:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Some CA on the lamp posts has to be removed and the highlights on the golden weather vane on top of the tower are burnt out which might be fixabel.--Ermell 07:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment CAs removed, but there isn't much to be done for the highlights (I prefer overexposed from remapped). Anyway, according to GIMP, only 0,1% of pixels are between 250 and 255 (overexposed). If you think that overexposure continues to be a significant issue, I can replace (digitally) the weather vane with one from another photo. --C messier 17:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Amsterdam royal palace. --C messier 10:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Some CA on the lamp posts has to be removed and the highlights on the golden weather vane on top of the tower are burnt out which might be fixabel.--Ermell 07:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Large dusty black plastic pipes front view. --W.carter 20:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose overexposed areas (see notes). Sorry, poor composition IMO: Random picture? Sorry, Why this picture can be QI?--Lmbuga 00:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Noted. Thanks for reviewing. W.carter 08:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Large dusty black plastic pipes side view. --W.carter 20:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Simplicitas stained glass window in All Saints church, Preston Bagot --DeFacto 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review There is significant green and blue/purple CA all over the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old crude glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please examine and see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Can't understand why this window is so problematic when the others are fine? Still blue/green fringes around all the lead details and also at the top, see note. Whatever can be done about this would be appreciated. W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Cecilia stained glass window in All Saints church, Preston Bagot --DeFacto 20:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion There is some slight green and blue/purple CA in several places in the window. Think you can remove that? W.carter 23:09, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
@W.carter: newly adjusted version uploaded. I think the lens CAs are minimal but the old rough glass does transmit a bluey turquoise light too. Please see what you make of it now. DeFacto 21:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. This one is ok now. --W.carter 08:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lake of Olarizu at the Botanical Garden. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain --Basotxerri 20:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted to the right. --Halavar 20:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Done Correct, it was tilted. I've uploaded a new version, please check. Thanks for the review! --Basotxerri 14:56, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Background could be sharper but fine at this resolution. --King of Hearts 03:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset over Balvatnet in Sulitjelma, Norway --Frankemann 19:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --W.carter 23:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1847) in Platten, Germany. --Palauenc05 17:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Hubertl 18:12, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tomba di Crespi-Provasoli, Busto Arsizio --Yiyi 17:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
It needs a vertical perspective correction along with a reduction of CA Poco a poco 19:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Tomba di Crespi-Provasoli, Busto Arsizio --Yiyi 17:05, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landsort kapell (chapell) . --ArildV 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Good but tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 13:42, 11 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you --ArildV 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Landsort kapell (chapell) . --ArildV 13:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
September 10, 2016
-
- Nomination Holy Trinity Chapel, Basingstoke, Hampshire. --Lewis Hulbert 18:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Comment Needs perspective correction, methinks.--Peulle 00:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
I'll do this later, you can decline for now. --Lewis Hulbert 07:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Does that mean you wish to withdraw the nomination, and fix it later?--Peulle 12:24, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes. I forgot that I could do that myself. --Lewis Hulbert 21:40, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Narapatir Dhap, Vasu Bihar. --Masum-al-hasan 19:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Jpeg artifacts. Please provide a version with less jpeg compression (or higher jpeg quality). --C messier 13:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Too unsharp at the edges, sorry. --King of Hearts 03:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
September 9, 2016
-
- Nomination: Old sluice gate during a drought. Hilden, Co. Antrim, Ireland.Notafly 12:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Comment Please check your image. There a re magenta CAs and IMO it's leaning out. --XRay 13:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. I am not sure of fixing this in Lightroom (new to me} Notafly 18:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Corinthian capital in the entry of El Jem City --IssamBarhoumi 09:50, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Comment If you increase the brightness a bit it will work IMO--Ermell 14:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC) dear Ermell done have alook please --IssamBarhoumi 14:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Comment I can´t find a difference. The white parts should be white. All your pictures are quite dark. Are the settings of your monitor correct?--Ermell 20:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC) dear --Ermell the monitor is ok and I added more brightness have look now --IssamBarhoumi 22:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Comment You shouldn't change the contrast in order to add brightness to the picture, it actually looks weirder now. You should try to adjust exposition correction. --Gyrostat 06:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC) dear Gyrostat and dear Ermell i edited it again and I think that it lightened properly have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 17:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Still not perfect. Auto contrast might be the easiest way to solve that problem.--Ermell 06:54, 11 September 2016 (UTC) dear Ermell and dear Gyrostat have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 14:25, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Eglwys Saint Sadwrn Henllan. Gradd: II*.Cymraeg: Grade: II* Church of St Sadwrn. Village of Henllan, Denbighshire. --Llywelyn2000 07:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Sharpness is good, CAs at the left side are fixable. But the monument at the left side is unfortunate cropped. Maybe the lines of tower are not in fact vertical, but the monument and tombs indicate that perspective correction is needed. And this correction will additionally worsen the composition.--Aeou 17:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: St. Saeran's church, Llanynys, Denbighshire, North Wales is a Grade 1 listed building. In 2015 a £4.5 million project came to an end, preserving this church. --Llywelyn2000 07:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review If you could only tone down the glare in the doorway and removed the CA there, this would be ok. --W.carter 09:01, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
September 8, 2016
-
- Nomination: “Upper Bath” pavilion in Catherine Park, Pushkin, Saint Petersburg. By User:Olga1969 --Brateevsky 17:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review This is very nice but there are some CAs in the trees. Could you try to remove them? --Basotxerri 18:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, but I don't know how to do this. I would be grateful for the help! --Brateevsky 19:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
In this case, you'll need a photo editor capable of removing CAs (chromatic aberrations). In your image, CAs can be seen as blue/green and red shadows at the branches of the trees (I'll leave you some notes on your image). In Adobe Lightroom this is quite easy, there's a special function for removing CAs. However, if the CAs are very strong, perhaps you won't get that totally fixed. Which would be a pity. --Basotxerri 08:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment I had a small "remove-CA-school" on my user page for another user not long ago. I'll post a copy of those tips on your talk page Brateevsky. :) W.carter 21:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment I'm deeply honoured. :-) --Basotxerri 14:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Arkhangelsk Gostiny Dvor. By User:Olga1969 --Brateevsky 17:52, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review The image is slightly tilted CCW, could you check that? --Basotxerri 18:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately, but I don't know how to do this. I would be grateful for the help! --Brateevsky 19:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
OK, I'll try to explain: the image is tilted counterclockwise. To correct this, you'll have to load the image in some photo editing software (free software like GIMP or commercial like Adobe Lightroom) and rotate the picture. Observe the vertical lines of the buildings and get them straight from up to down. Check that on the left and on the right side of the picture. --Basotxerri 08:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination ETR 500 Italian high-speed train at Milano Centrale --Daniel Case 17:30, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Visible CA at the ceiling of the train station. Try to reduce highlights as well. --ElBute 16:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Just to let you know I am working on this. Daniel Case 02:33, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Done OK, this is what I could do. Daniel Case 22:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Comment I'm afraid the overexposition at the end of the station is not recoverable. However, this is unavoidable and not the object of interest in the photo. In any case, the CA at the ceiling are still very noticeable. It's easy to fix that. --ElBute 10:31, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
yeah, efforts to fix the other end usually made the CA worse, so I had to strike a balance; if we just focus on that maybe it will work. Daniel Case 16:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC) Support I did it for you. If you don't agree, please revert. Good quality now. --ElBute 08:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Barbour Mill. Hilden, Co. Antrim, Ireland.Notafly 14:13, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review I'm sorry, this image needs a perspective correction. Can you see that the left and the right side are leaning in? The problem is that by fixing the perspective the image will get smaller and the left wall of the building is already near to the border. So try and let's see. Ah, the image would get better if you brightened the shadows a bit. --Basotxerri 08:25, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Thankyou. I did perspective correction already.No more can be done as you say Notafly 18:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Djeser-Djeseru – Hatshepsut's temple. --Hamerani 12:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review The ramparts up to the temple are overexposed. Do you think you can tone them down a bit? The rest of the picture is stunning so I would really like to be able to promote it. W.carter 22:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burg Rabeneck über der Wiesent bei Waischenfeld --Ermell 12:37, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion At first I thought it was an old B&W photo, but once I opened it on full size...WOW! There is some red CA in the tree to the right that should be removed though, and some noise reduction in the sky and the water would be very welcome. W.carter 22:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Done New and hopefully better version. Thanks for the review.--Ermell 19:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Good quality. --W.carter 08:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
September 7, 2016
-
- Nomination Entry into Jerusalem church. White town Kimry district, Tver region --AlixSaz 12:22, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Needs better categorisation and is the left crop fixable? It is way too tight. --C messier 13:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Thank you. Categories added, but the image is unfortunately irreparable--AlixSaz 14:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done within a week. --W.carter 19:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
September 6, 2016
-
- Nomination The Mihrab of mosque Okba Kairouan details --IssamBarhoumi 14:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Needs some perspective adjustment and preferably a crop to center the composition a bit more. W.carter 19:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Not done within a week. W.carter 19:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mean Average --AKirch-Bonn 07:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Perspective has to be corrected.--Ermell 12:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 15:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Promotion Pincushion distortion. --King of Hearts 02:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 07:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Support --King of Hearts 04:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Mean Average --AKirch-Bonn 07:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Perspective has to be corrected.--Ermell 12:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kirche Sankt Adelheid am Pützchen --AKirch-Bonn 07:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC) CommentPerspective needs correction and the CA should be removed--Ermell 12:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 15:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Review needed
- Nomination: Kirche Sankt Adelheid am Pützchen --AKirch-Bonn 07:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC) CommentPerspective needs correction and the CA should be removed--Ermell 12:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
-
- Nomination OS Grid Ref: SH839062 Late medieval church heavily restored in the nineteenth century, the interior was altered in 1902. However the roof dates from the fifteenth century and the porch is dated 1742. Coflein:http://www.coflein.gov.uk/en/site/400342/details/ST+TYDECHO%27S+CHURCH%2C+CEMMAES/ --Llywelyn2000 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Sky is probably gone and eating out leaves, also, fringes on the tree. --C messier 12:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Oppose Too strong CA, sorry. But thanks for sharing welsh asset (in welsh !)--Jebulon 09:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
September 5, 2016
-
- Nomination National Flag Memorial and Propylea, Rosario, Argentina --Ezarate 23:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline Comment Underexposed, pincushion distortion and maybe tilted. --C messier 13:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Done --Ezarate 12:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Pincushion distortion and tilt is still there. Also a symmetry shot would have been better. --C messier 13:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC) I tried again Ezarate 13:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Not good enough. --C messier 11:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Oppose Sorry, not good for QI--Jebulon 09:22, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
September 2, 2016
-
- Nomination Athena Lemnia (Akademisches Kunstmuseum Bonn) --AKirch-Bonn 07:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)green CAs overall, please check. --Hubertl 08:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
New version uploaded--AKirch-Bonn 15:05, 10 September 2016 (UTC) - Decline Sorry, but the CAs are still there. Pretty severe. --Hubertl 07:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Wo sollen die sein? Es ist schwierig in eurem erlauchten Kreis aufgenommen zu werden ;-) Aber nichts für ungut es hat mir auch gezeigt worauf ich mehr achten muss. Bis dann --AKirch-Bonn 13:24, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination Athena Lemnia (Akademisches Kunstmuseum Bonn) --AKirch-Bonn 07:13, 2 September 2016 (UTC)green CAs overall, please check. --Hubertl 08:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
September 1, 2016
-
- Nomination: Vu du massif bordant le Célé. --Thesupermat 11:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Review Do you think you could upload a smaller version and nominate it instead? 146MB is a bit much, n'est-ce pas? Daniel Case 03:58, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment Nice file. ;-) IMO two stitching problems. IMO sharpness could be better for a file like this (size). More EXIF data would be nice. --XRay 05:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
August 31, 2016
-
- Nomination Traffic mirror. Alvor, Algarve, Portugal.Notafly 20:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Tilted --Moroder 07:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thanks.fixed? Notafly 19:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Now you cropped off the bottom of the street sign and the top right and bottom left corners need to be fixed but overall I'm very unhappy with the composition of the image and I doubt it is QI anyway --Moroder 09:03, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment New adjusted and cropped version uploaded, description improved and better cats added. W.carter 14:58, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
OK for me now. --Basotxerri 16:20, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Consensual review
Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}
or{{oppose}}
will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
Consensual Review
File:Reichsgraben_Kellergasse,_Zellerndorf_Niederösterreich-6738.jpg
- Nomination Winemaker alley with press houses and wine cellars, Reichsgraben, located in Zellerndorf, Lower Austria. By User:Kellergassen Niederösterreich 2016 --Hubertl 15:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
Opposetoo dark for me --Pudelek 15:54, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Now is ok --Pudelek 10:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)- Done Its good practice, not to decline images with such simple problems --Hubertl 17:35, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Certainly not too dark now, and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support There is no doubt about good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good quality now --Kroton 05:43, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Yep, it's ok. W.carter 08:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 08:57, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Pudelek 10:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Ornamental pool in Jameos del Agua.jpg
- Nomination Exterior lake in Jameos del Agua. Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain. --ElBute 10:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Lake? This looks more like a "lake-shaped" pool to me. W.carter 11:36, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Sorry, Insufficient quality. far away from beeing a QI, IMO --Hubertl 11:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC) ** Comment Yes, it's an artificial lake or a pool not intended for bathing
- Comment Hubertl Could you please be a bit more specific? What are the so obvious reasons for your rejection? --ElBute 12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I appreciate more opinions. --Hubertl 13:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I think the issue for me is one of definition. In English, we would not call this a lake. I would call it a pool, and since it's not intended for swimming, I suppose an "ornamental pool", though that isn't a common term. As for the picture's quality, the focus looks OK to me except for a bit of unsharpness in the upper half of the area near the right margin, but overall, it looks good enough for QI to me. So my advice, for what it's worth, would be: (1) Change the filename from "Lake in Jameos del Agua" to "Pool in Jameos del Agua", and also change the English-language description accordingly Once you do that, for whatever it's worth, I would vote to support this as a QI, although I would like to know whether there's something Hubertl saw that I'm missing. -- Ikan Kekek 00:59, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I appreciate more opinions. --Hubertl 13:45, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hubertl Could you please be a bit more specific? What are the so obvious reasons for your rejection? --ElBute 12:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment for me this picture lacks on details on the dark parts. --Hubertl 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right. I was focusing too much on the pool itself, I think.
Oppose per Hubertl.-- Ikan Kekek 06:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right. I was focusing too much on the pool itself, I think.
- Done OK, at least now I have a reason for rejection. It doesn't help when your picture is rejected with no reason at all. Well, shadows have been lightened up. Now, there is more detail in there. Regarding the description, it has been updated to "ornamental pool". I do my best with the English but I'm not a native speaker, you know. In any case, nothing that could not be fixed. BTW, changing the file name is not something I can do, right? How could I ask for a filename change? Sorry, I'm not very skilled in Commons as well, but I try to learn every day. --ElBute 08:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support File name changed. You click on the "More" tab at the top of the file's page and then on "Move" and request the renaming of the file. Someone with move-rights will do the move for you. In this case I did it for you. I also added a category, Category:Ornamental pools in Spain, the expression is very much in use on Commons at least. With the shadows lifted I think it's ok. W.carter 08:55, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - This is now good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 06:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Southease_Church,from_the_east.jpg
- Nomination The Parish Church. By User:Michael Coppins --Lewis Hulbert 21:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --A.Savin 00:08, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree, the picture is fine but the description should be a bit more than just three words and a tag. A reader should not have to go back through the categories to find out where the church is located or even which country it's located in. Please fix that and I'll support this for QI. --W.carter 21:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Nice church, good composition, perhaps a bit too bright. But this should be correctable. -- Spurzem 08:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- The thing that brought that pic here was not the quality of the photo, but the documentation on the file's page. It is stated very clearly in the rules for QI that description, categories and file name must be good as well, yet so many users seem to forget this and focus only on the photo itself. Without a good description a file is hard to find and hard to use. W.carter 08:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 06:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:16-08-31-Saeima-RR2_3894.jpg
- Nomination The Saeima, Parliament ofLatvia --Ralf Roletschek 19:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --A.Savin 23:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sorry, I disagree. Excellent composition, but I find it too unsharp at full size. -- Ikan Kekek 08:38, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Hubertl 06:12, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Mausolée_de_C._Marius_Romanus_03.jpg
- Nomination Marius Romanus Mausoleum in Kairouan --IssamBarhoumi 22:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment Not a bad photo but it needs a much better description. W.carter 10:01, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor composition IMO. Overexposed areas--Lmbuga 21:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment dear W.carter I added some information but there is a lack of historical data It take me a lot of research to find the site and photograph it for wiki loves monuments this is the first free photo for the Mausoleum. dear Lmbuga there i only that building there you can verify by the location I added it in the photo details.--
- Comment The description is good enough now, but please remember to sign your comments! I can't se any overexposed areas except for the sun, but that is unavoidable, and the sun is not even posterized, something that I find remarkable. The composition is not poor, but rather bold and striking. Let's discuss this one.--W.carter 13:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment dear W.carter I added some information but there is a lack of historical data It take me a lot of research to find the site and photograph it for wiki loves monuments this is the first free photo for the Mausoleum. dear Lmbuga there i only that building there you can verify by the location I added it in the photo details.--
- Support per above. W.carter 08:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per W.carter. I find it striking and touching, too. IssamBarhoumi, I hope you are not looking directly at the sun while you take pictures! -- Ikan Kekek 06:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Remarkable quality for a shot against the sun. --Palauenc05 09:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 06:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Great_Sphinx_of_Giza_(1).jpg
- Nomination Great Sphinx of Giza --Hamerani 09:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment While the photo is sharp and all, you have the same problem that most photographers have when taking pics of the sphinx from this angle: There is a huge pyramid behind it and those are pretty hard to move. Some have opted for cloning it out, but I think it has a good documentary value to keep it in the picture. Only, I think it would be better if you could darken the pyramid just a little bit so that it doesn't blend in as much with the sphinx as it does right now. We need something to separate the two here. Think you can do that? W.carter 21:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The suggested changes are Not done but are not strictly necessary for promotion IMO. This is a case where the composition could be better, but isn't bad by any means. --King of Hearts 04:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - W.carter's suggestion is a good one, but that's provided you want to make the picture look different from how it probably looked when you took the photo. I agree that the pyramid blends in with the sphinx somewhat, but the texture is different enough to distinguish them. I think this is good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:2016R1535_-_Київ.jpg
- Nomination Собор Софійський, Київ, Володимирська вул., 24 --Мирослав Видрак 07:32, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Unsuitable crop, IMO. --Peulle 08:03, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Maybe a composition choice. Should be discussed IMO.--Jebulon 09:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I find the crop bold and interesting, focusing on the smaller towers instead if the whole building. W.carter 10:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Same as W.carter --Moroder 18:41, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Spurzem 08:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine composition. --Palauenc05 09:07, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 05:33, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Traktormuseum Bodensee - Entrance area.jpg
- Nomination Part of the entrance area of the Traktormuseum Bodensee --Llez 14:29, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Upper side seems a bit overexposed IMO--Lmbuga 14:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Info I tried to improve a bit --Llez 15:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Info I tried to improve a bit --Llez 15:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose.The upper part is much too bright.Please discuss. -- Spurzem 19:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)- Comment I would suggest you simply crop the picture, see note. That would really improve it. W.carter 11:24, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Done Crop as suggested, also a bit on the left side because of symmetry --Llez 11:31, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Love what you've done with the place. :) This transformed it from a snapshot to a work of art. cart-Talk 16:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The upper part is cut now. O.K.! Very good done. -- Spurzem 18:41, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Good composition and the focus is quite adequate. -- Ikan Kekek 00:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 09:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Hubertl 19:05, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Villa_Balbianello_3724_Planar_3.jpg
- Nomination Villa Balbianello (Lenno) --Hamster28 07:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Right side of the image is blurred. Sorry, this is not a QI. --Halavar 08:24, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I would give some leeway to a 35 MP image for unsharpness. If downsampled to the 2 MP minimum it's perfectly sharp. --King of Hearts 02:50, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I could overlook problems with the background, but here there are issues even with the island and statues. The only thing that seems problem free is the actual house. --Peulle 09:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I was ready to support this photo until I saw just how distorted by blurring the right side is. My feeling is, if you're getting that much blurring on the right, crop most of it out. I could see supporting a photo that was cropped just to the right of the church and cliffs. -- Ikan Kekek 10:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Incredible: 10,096 × 3,511 pixels. With this size is it a bit blurred to be QI?
If the picture has 2 megapixels, the picture is not blurred. Someone is not thinking, sorry--Lmbuga 01:14, 16 September 2016 (UTC) - Comment Right side must be blurring. In this area there is ((or "are")) nothing in focus--Lmbuga 01:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Very good picture. Very bad specialists IMO, sorry. Too reviewing child IMO--Lmbuga 01:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Question What happened to the third flag pole and the statue on right? They seems tilted/leaning to right. Some unfocused buildings on right too. I've no problem for those unfocused effect though as they are far away. Jkadavoor 03:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The main subject, the island, is in focus. --Palauenc05 09:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Per Palauenc05 and Lmbuga. --Basotxerri 09:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote? --Palauenc05 12:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Micronia aculeata 8124.jpg
- Nomination Micronia aculeata --Vengolis 02:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:07, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose This is not sharp enough. Charlesjsharp 09:45, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I must agree with Charlesjsharp.--Peulle 08:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I must agree with Charlesjsharp and Peulle. + Unfocussed foreground is disturbing--Lmbuga 21:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 06:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --Peulle 08:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Arrival hall, Milano Centrale station, wide view.jpg
- Nomination Arrivals hall in Milano Centrale --Daniel Case 02:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 03:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose There are perspective issues, and overexposed roof. Sorry, I disagree. --A.Savin 07:41, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much noise, and lighting issues. --Peulle 08:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Hubertl 06:18, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Spire of Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden 1643.jpg
- Nomination The spire of Sint-Bonifatiuskerk, Leeuwarden. --C messier 11:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Something wrong with focus, does not appear like QI for me --A.Savin 10:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Focus wasn't spot on, but still it was good enough. New version with some changes, please discuss. --C messier 13:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I made sure that I was looking at both versions and even cleared my cache to make doubly sure. Even in the new version, nothing is crisp sharp, and the top of the spire is quite fuzzy. I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem like a QI to me. -- Ikan Kekek 10:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support I think sharpness is good enough for QI --Imehling 12:03, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Unsharp, but QI if you resize the picture at 2 megapixels--Lmbuga 21:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
- Question - Is there an unofficial QIC policy that all images larger than 2 MP should be reduced to 2 MP before the sharpness is judged, or is that only your method for judging whether the focus is sufficient for you? I'm confused by your argument, because Commons:Image guidelines specifically says: "Images should not be downsampled (sized down in order to appear of better quality). Downsampling reduces the amount of information stored in the image file." And in the section covering focus and depth of field, no comments are made about going easier on larger files or judging downsampled 2-MP versions of them instead of the files themselves. I would agree that a really tiny area of unsharpness in an otherwise crisp 40 MP image shouldn't be a bar to QI - nor in most cases to FP - but I could use a little help (rather than invective or generalized complaining) in understanding the unofficial standards that are used at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 10:13, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, the quality should be evaluated based merely on the uploaded size. Anything else is too complicated anyway and a bias towards high-resolution cameras (a 50 mpix picture downsampled to 2 mpix is of course nearly always "sharp", but not necessarily a technically good shot; QIC should be about a good focus, exposure, and postprocess; not about certain cameras). --A.Savin 20:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- I don't completely agree with A.Savin here. The guidelines say that an image should not be downsampled in order to appear of better quality. Therefore, if camera can shoot 24 MP, one should not reduce this to 3 MP in order to make it look sharper. If that has been done, it's a disqualifier in itself. As technology developes, the standards also change; an image that was considered QI 8 years ago might not be considered good enough if uploaded today.--Peulle 21:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly you misunderstood? I didn't say that downsampling is in itself a reason to decline; some downsampling is OK for me if necessary (sometimes it is); what I mean is that an image uploaded at 24 mpix should be judged based on what you see at 100% of a 24 mpix image, and not on what you see when downsampled to 2 (or 4, or 11, ...) mpix. With other words, when you shoot an unsharp 24 mpix photo, you may upload it downsampled to 2 mpix and then nominate on QIC if you think that it looks sharp enough then; but you may not nominate the full 24 mpix version and claim on QIC "well, just look at it in downsampled preview". At least with me, this wouldn't work. Lmbuga and others may think different, we have no such policy afaik. --A.Savin 23:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing this. Much appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek 00:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Just to clarify: the rules open up for downsampling if neccessary, but not if the objective is to make an unsharp image appear sharp.--Peulle 15:27, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Possibly you misunderstood? I didn't say that downsampling is in itself a reason to decline; some downsampling is OK for me if necessary (sometimes it is); what I mean is that an image uploaded at 24 mpix should be judged based on what you see at 100% of a 24 mpix image, and not on what you see when downsampled to 2 (or 4, or 11, ...) mpix. With other words, when you shoot an unsharp 24 mpix photo, you may upload it downsampled to 2 mpix and then nominate on QIC if you think that it looks sharp enough then; but you may not nominate the full 24 mpix version and claim on QIC "well, just look at it in downsampled preview". At least with me, this wouldn't work. Lmbuga and others may think different, we have no such policy afaik. --A.Savin 23:44, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- I don't completely agree with A.Savin here. The guidelines say that an image should not be downsampled in order to appear of better quality. Therefore, if camera can shoot 24 MP, one should not reduce this to 3 MP in order to make it look sharper. If that has been done, it's a disqualifier in itself. As technology developes, the standards also change; an image that was considered QI 8 years ago might not be considered good enough if uploaded today.--Peulle 21:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, the quality should be evaluated based merely on the uploaded size. Anything else is too complicated anyway and a bias towards high-resolution cameras (a 50 mpix picture downsampled to 2 mpix is of course nearly always "sharp", but not necessarily a technically good shot; QIC should be about a good focus, exposure, and postprocess; not about certain cameras). --A.Savin 20:43, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support The argument on how to review is a bit complicated. We can't encourage excessive downsampling as our minimum threshold is only 2MP. At the same time a very large file sharp only in 2/3 MP is also not acceptable. So I prefer a middle ground. For larger files above 6MP (excluding stitched panoramas), if they are not sharp enough in their full resolution, I will check them again in a reasonable resolution. Here this is first uploaded in almost camera's maximum resolution; most APC/MFTs are not that much good enough. It's acceptable for me in this size. Jkadavoor 13:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Jkadavoor 13:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Evening light into Kobbskaret in Sørfold.jpg
- Nomination Evening light into Kobbskaret in Sørfold, Norway --Frankemann 19:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)--
- Discussion
- Support Good quality --Halavar 20:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I disagree. Beautiful photo, but there are large posterized bright areas in the sky. Ikan Kekek 05:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I would appreciate another opinion. Should this be considered a QI because of its excellence aside from the posterized areas, or should the technical problem rule that out? -- Ikan Kekek 04:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support IMO the problems are not serious enough to decline. --Palauenc05 09:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - If no-one disagrees, I'm content to declare this a QI. I'll check back tomorrow and see if there are any more comments. If not, I will drop my initial opposition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --W.carter 08:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)