Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 151: Line 151:
*The uploader is blocked for sockpuppetry and both photos uploaded under this name are out of [[COM:SCOPE]]. {{o}} per [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juwel Chowdhury.jpg]] [[User:Ankry|Ankry]] ([[User talk:Ankry|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
*The uploader is blocked for sockpuppetry and both photos uploaded under this name are out of [[COM:SCOPE]]. {{o}} per [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Juwel Chowdhury.jpg]] [[User:Ankry|Ankry]] ([[User talk:Ankry|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
----
----
Undeleted request declined per [[User:Ankry|''Ankry'']] and [[User:JWilz12345|''JWilz12345'']].
Undeleted request declined per [[User:Ankry|''Ankry'']] and [[User:JWilz12345|''JWilz12345'']]. --[[User:Contributers2020|<span style="color:orange;">'''Contributers'''</span><span style="color:red;">'''2020'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Contributers2020|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk to me here'''</span>]]</sup> 10:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
{{udelf}}
{{udelf}}

{{udelh}}


== [[:File:Gera Mihály.jpg]] to undelete ==
== [[:File:Gera Mihály.jpg]] to undelete ==

Revision as of 10:30, 3 November 2021

Current requests

Shortcuts: COM:UDR • COM:UDELC • COM:UNDELC

Request undeletion

Enter a descriptive heading and press the button:

This is a dashboard widget.

File:Peace and Friendship stadium 2014.JPG

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Peace and Friendship Stadium; this had valid fair uses on various Wikipedia pages (as the depiction of an object which was directly discussed in the relevant articles); and the closer of that discussion did not react to my request to spare this bureaucracy, so there you have it. This should be restored and moved to relevant Wiki as appropriate; I assume that one can trace back from which pages on other encyclopedias than the English one this was removed (where it also was likely fair use), likely via the edits of the Commons bot. RandomCanadian (talk) 04:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose @RandomCanadian: Commons does not accept Fair Use, see COM:L. Ankry (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: This is not a request to undelete this for use on Commons. This is a request to restore it in a temporary fashion so it can be moved to Wikipedia where fair use is accepted. RandomCanadian (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support temporary undeletion. But @RandomCanadian: , enwiki no longer applies fair use for images of unfree buildings from no FOP countries. Enwiki applies U.S. freedom of panorama for such buildings, thus w:Template:FoP-USonly. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored temporarily -- please advise when this has been moved. Please do not close this UnDR without deleting the file. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see there are other Wikis where this image is also used. I've restored a copy on english WP under a slightly different title ("File:Peace and Friendship stadium 02 03 2014.JPG"). Noting the others for the record in case the other wikis also want to use it:
Extended content

Usage on az.wikipedia.org

Usage on kk.wikipedia.org

Usage on mni.wikipedia.org

Usage on ro.wikipedia.org

Usage on sr.wikipedia.org

Usage on tr.wikipedia.org

Usage on uk.wikipedia.org

RandomCanadian (talk) 23:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Additional note: mind doing the same treatment for File:Faliro_Sport_Pavillion.jpg and File:OAKA_Olympic_Velodrome.jpg (found via the history of w:Venues of the 2004 Summer Olympics)? Same considerations apply. RandomCanadian (talk) 00:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RandomCanadian: ensure that all of them must be used. The fact that enwiki has accepted original-resolution images of unfree international buildings from no-FOP countries does not mean enwiki is an indefinite host for all images of unfree buildings, as it is not a media repository. Thus there are only four Burj Khalifa images there and a single image of Burj Al Arab. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: These all seem to be related to buildings and venues from the 2004 Olympics ([1] shows the Faliro pavillion being removed from multiple pages, including the page about the venue itself; [2] idem for the velodrome). RandomCanadian (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RandomCanadian: in such case, then I  Support undeletions of the two other files. Be sure to tag them with en:Template:FoP-USonly once they are transferred at enwiki. German Wikipedia also does seem to allow unfree buildings of no-FOP countries, but I cannot remember what is their relevant tag of it. Unsure about other Wikipedias though. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blacked-out images

Per input by Kai Burghardt at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP in France. No copyright concerns on blacked-out versions of images. To quote their input: To qualify as a derivative work, you need to create a work. A solid black shape is not a work. There is hardly any creative/artistic process involved in creating that. Even if you claim it was a work, to be derived there still must be recognizable features, discernible clues of the original work present. Without any copyrightable traces of the source work, no violation..

In terms of scope, as these come from no-FOP countries, these are excellent illustrations on one of the effects of having no FOP in a country: censorship just to respect artists' / architects' copyrights.

From the Philippines

I excluded those whose mother files are suspected copyvios, and those whose buildings are from pre-1972 era. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)

From UAE
From Luxembourg

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Plenty of photos to illustrate this subject at Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP. There is no real reason to add another 10 photos, 100 photos or 10 million photos of a black cube. Thuresson (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Thuresson: but there is nothing specific to the Philippines. All come from other countries. We need demonstrations about the disadvantage of having no FOP in our country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This seems reasonable. But I do not think all 13 are needed for them. Do you intend to use all of them? Ankry (talk) 14:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: yep. Off-wiki on social media (of course, complying with attribution conditions). I support not restoring the UAE and Luxembourg ones. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:45, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Plus I may use several of the Philippine-related images on Tagalog Wikipedia to illustrate the lack of freedom of panorama. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Please add File:Hand of epigyny 2 Blacked Out.jpg to undeletion request. Ox1997cow (talk) 15:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: And when files are undeleted, will you add the category of countries without freedom of panorama to User:JWilz12345/FoP? Ox1997cow (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: my userspace subpage is intended to illustrate those from countries with FOP, excluding those without FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: I am not convinced that you need the whole bunch for social media for educational purposes. Ankry (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: yet there is no such image specific to the Philippines. All of the existing ones are of other countries. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:13, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Yep. And I would support 2-3, but not 14. For educational purpose this should be enough. Not supporting more per COM:NOTHOST. Ankry (talk) 18:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ankry: I chose five instead: File:EDSA Shrine EDSA Tayo (no freedom of panorama phl blacked-out).png, File:Lapu - lapu Statue in Cebu, Philippines (no freedom of panorama phl blacked-out).png, File:Quezon Memorial Circle 04 (no freedom of panorama phl blacked-out).png, File:Sultan Hajji Hassanal Bolkhia Mosque 1 (no freedom of panorama phl blacked-out).png, and File:Taft Avenue - LRT-1 UN Station (Ermita, Manila)(2017-12-30) (no freedom of panorama phl blacked-out).png. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from thinking these are out of scope, I  Oppose restoration on copyright grounds. In of the cases above that I examined, the silhouette of the work is distinctive and almost certainly infringes on the creator's copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: but users who commented at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Blacked out versions of images relying on FoP in France think of otherwise (@Ralf Roletschek, Kai Burghardt, and Romaine: ). No distinctive features like style of windows, sculptural details, and façade details seen. Blacked-out representations of copyrighted works from no-FOP countries are also extensively used on comparison graphs like File:Tallest towers in the world.svg (containing Iran's Millad Tower) and File:Tallest Buildings in the World 2020.png (containing Burj Khalifa and Saudi Arabia's Abraj al-Bait Building), including Ox1997cow's derivatives File:Tallest towers in the world whether or not FoP.svg and File:Tallest Buildings in the World 2020 whether or not FoP.png. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Why not mention Lotte World Tower? Obviously, I marked that Lotte World Tower does not have freedom of panorama. (because there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea.) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Church_of_the_Gesu_2019.jpg

Requesting undeletion for upload in the English Wikipedia for en:Church of the Gesù, Quezon City, since there is no explicit FOP in the Philippines.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SolaireResort&Casinojf0966_04.JPG

No FOP in the Philippines. For reuploading in the English Wiki main space for Solaire Resort & CasinoHariboneagle927 (talk) 07:34, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aditayadornkitikhun 2019.jpg

This picture do come have source, The Television Pool of Thailand is from NBT. --Thyj (talk) 11:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Originating from this video and deleted per this DR. Ankry (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Torre de Manila (July 25, 2016).jpg

Requesting temporary undeletion. To be uploaded under fair use in the English wiki mainspace at Torre de Manila. There is no FOP in the Philippines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariboneagle927 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 30 October 2021‎  (UTC+8)

File:UnionBank Plaza.jpg

There is no FOP in the Philippines, therefore the image could only be hosted in the English Wikipedia mainspace. Requesting temporary undeletion.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AntonioGanRet.jpg

The picture of the file belongs to my family; Antonio Gan was my uncle. We allow all the permissions to make the picture public. Mjimenezale (talk) 12:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjimenezale: Copyright by default belongs to the photographer unless transferred in a contract or by oparation of law until expired. If you own copyright, please, provide evidence for this through VRT process together with a written free license permission. Ankry (talk) 20:52, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Czesław Słanias 1000e Frimärke - 2000.jpg

This stamp is a derivative work of a 17th century public domain painting by , a version of which is File:Ehrenstrahl plafond 1690.jpg and another version is File:Allegori över svenska konungars berömliga bedrifter (David Klöcker Ehrenstrahl) - Nationalmuseum - 174873.tif, so the stamp should also be in the public domain. The additional text is not copyrightable. This image shows the stamp in a sheetlet but I think, but don't recall exactly, the previously uploaded stamp showed just the stamp like this. Ww2censor (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info While the presented work is PD, its engraving may be copyrighted per separate copyright of the engraver. Ankry (talk) 20:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's a topic for discussion. It's not a blatant copyvio, so IMO it should be restored, cropped to just the stamp (since the outline of the building at the bottom is copyrighted), and run through regular DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:15, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No objection from me. But it may be simpler to upload another image instead of cropping. Ankry (talk) 08:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:seleclogo.png

The owner has granted permission to use the logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Preshitkale (talk • contribs) 08:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC) --Preshitkale (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where is said permission? Did the owner send it to OTRS? --Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jose Maria Benito Serra - Misionero.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file is requested to be undeleted by the user Raderich on JuTa's talkpage by the rationale This is a copy of a photo of the 1870s (!). It's not a derivative work and it has no copyright. The source should be specified, but that's no reason to delete it. I'll look for source but could you please restore it?

I think this is the correct forum for discussing this. Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should have provided a source, which you didn't. Instead you claimed it as own work and gave your username as the author/photographer. Also, the self-CC license is wrong, as it's not your work. So, there is some work for you to do. --Túrelio (talk) 10:46, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Túrelio, I didn't upload it to begin with. It was a newcomer who did it. I just liked this uncopyrighted photo and I would like it back. Please restore it and I'll make the license right.--Raderich (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, as my colleague JuTa wasn't online since 9 days, I'll do it conditionally. I thought to answer/address the uploader, as they are usually requesting, but as I see now, none of you was the uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Contributers2020, Raderich, and Elena Magariños: Please note, that the photo may be redeleted soon if noone provides correct authorship/date/source/copyright info. We cannot host photos with false copyright claims. Ankry (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Ankry!--Raderich (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Juwel Chowdhury.jpg

Please restore this file — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juwel khan Abir (talk • contribs) 19:51, 2 November 2021  (UTC+8)

Undeleted request declined per Ankry and JWilz12345. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 10:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gera Mihály.jpg to undelete

This photo was used with the permission of the photographer. He also sent an e-mail to the [email protected] e-mail address on 25th of October with the requested letter (please find it below), that it's his photo and that he agrees that Wikimedia uses it. So please undelete this photo. The page was made on the 90th anniversary of Mihály Gera's (Hungarian photo historian) birthday with the permission of his widower.

Kijelentem, hogy az alábbi kép(ek) szerzői jogainak tulajdonosaként jogosult vagyok a képek szerzői jogairól nyilatkozni:

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gera_Mih%C3%A1ly#/media/F%C3%A1jl:Gera_Mih%C3%A1ly.jpg Beleegyezem, hogy a képek a Wikimédia-projektek oldalain a „Nevezd meg! – Így add tovább! 4.0” (CC-BY-SA 4.0) licenc alatt kerüljenek közzétételre.

A hozzájárulás nem korlátozódik a Wikipédiára, vagy az ahhoz kapcsolódó oldalakra. Elfogadom, hogy biztosítom a jogot a képek terjesztésére, kereskedelmi vagy nemkereskedelmi célból történő felhasználására, vagy igény szerinti módosítására, amennyiben betartják ezen licenc és a törvények szabta feltételeket.

Kérem, hogy engem mint szerzőt az alábbi módon jelöljenek meg:

Gaál Zoltán Jelen engedélyemmel szerzői jogaimról nem mondok le, de a mások által végzett módosítások nem lesznek nekem tulajdonítva.

Elfogadom, hogy ezt a beleegyezésemet nem vonhatom vissza. Tudomásul veszem, hogy a képeket a Wikimédia-projektek nem biztos, hogy örökké megőrzik.

2021 October 25 Gaál Zoltán — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertCapaCenter (talk • contribs) 12:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Then why was said permission not mentioned on the file-page? Instead, you, User:RobertCapaCenter, claimed it as own work. --Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose If a VRT permission is required per policy, we should not undelete the image until the permission is verified and accepted. If you have doubts or questions concerning this permission processing, you can ask a question inb COM:ON. Seven days is not long time in permission processing. Ankry (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Ticket:2021102510007816. @Ankry: That's not correct. Anything with a ticket gets a 30-day grace period, and we shouldn't punish the uploader for getting an extremely convoluted upload form wrong. It is extremely non-obvious that they should use a {{subst:OP}} tag when uploading to prevent the image from being tagged for deletion. I have loudly complained about this problem, but since much of the Upload Wizard interface lives on TranslateWiki it's not so simple for a Commoner to fix. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le 2 generazioni di Lancia Ypsilon a confronto.jpeg

I ask for the cancellation of the deletion of the file in question as the photo is entirely my work and consequently I do not understand why the photo has been deleted for copyright infringement if the author is me .. Furthermore, being a wikipedia user only a few months ago, I would like to receive a clarification on the error that caused the deletion of the photo in such a way as not to commit it anymore to post the photo without problems. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lancia Dude (talk • contribs) 15:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apple_Pay_Availability.svg

Hi! This is regarding the MAP for availability of ApplePay. The current map is not interact-able as the map that used to be used before. The previous map can be interacted by hovering over the map and check the countries name. I have given the link to the original Map link below. Do check it out and compare with the current version. Hope this is taken into consideration and the map is reverted back to the original map. Thank you!

old Map link: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Apple_Pay_Availability.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maimulhk (talk • contribs) 08:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=605231244"