User talk:Krdbot/archive/2015

A kitten for you!

THANK YOU!

ARMASEDGAR (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:21, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Files

User talk:RoyKabanlit 5:35 pm 25 January 2015 (MPST)

Hi. About my recent uploads that you deleted, I think those files should be okay since Wiki Commons also accepted sources from the same Facebook page (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PG-375.jpg). It is supposed to be "Public Domain" since it was owned by an employee of the Philippine government.

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Luna City Express by Eddi Kruse.jpg

Hallo Krd, an wen kann ich mit bitte wenden, wenn ich hilfe bei der Auswahl der richtigen Lizenz zum Hochladen des Bildes brauche? Ein Genehmigungsschreiben von Eddy Kruse dem Urheber habe ich, die auf dem Bild abgebildete band ist bei uns unter vertrag. Wie gehe ich am besten vor, um das Bild erfolgreich hochzuladen? Vielen Dank, semimbatic

Hallo semimbatic. Siehe bitte: COM:OTRS. Da müsste eigentlich alles drinstehen, ansonsten melde Dich bitte gern wieder hier. Gruß… --Krd 14:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Logo Technitoit La Maison autonettoyante

Bonjour,

J'ai voulu intégré le logo de l'entreprise "Techntoit La maison autonettoyante" dans l'Infobox de la société que j'ai créé ce matin. Visiblement, ceci viole les droits d'auteur.

Le logo est présent partout sur Internet, raison pour laquelle je pensais que l'intégrer ne posait pas de problèmes.

Du coup, comment puis-je faire ? Dois-je demander l'autorisation à l'entreprise Technitoit pour mettre ce logo dans la page de Technitoit sur Wikipédia ?

Merci d'avance pour votre aide,

Cordialement,

Hi Thomas Négrier. As I don't speak french I answer in english. Yes, you could ask the copyright holder to publish the logo under a free license, see COM:LIC, but I dount that this will be granted. Please also see Commons:Email templates for additional information. Thank you. --Krd 15:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello, I want to ask to remove the file that I uploaded, as I believe I am violating the copyright of the channel, please do not want to get in trouble for this, Thanks.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anunciaci%C3%B3n_de_negaci%C3%B3n_de_adopci%C3%B3n_gay_en_Colombia.jpg

--PZMCami (talk) 03:22, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi PZMCami. I deleted the file. --Krd 07:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 07:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Cong, Fauxhaux, ponyhawk

Hallo! Habe gesehen, Du bist Deutsch, also brauch ich nur weiterzuschreiben. Ich bin neu hier und schreibe derzeit an einem Artikel, einer Auflistung von Frisuren. Das hochladender Bilder entstand mit dem Willen, die Auflistung noch zu verbessern und jetzt da die Bilder von ihnen mit einigen Löschungen bearbeitet wurden, frage ich mich natürlich, wo ich hätte erkennen können, ob diese gegen Rechte verstoßen. Über eine Antwort zu den einzelnen Bilder wäre ich schon verbunden, um exemplarisch zu verstehen, wie aus deren Quellen sichtbar ist, ob man bei Verwendung Rechte verletzt oder nicht. --BuschBracke (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Hallo BuschBracke. Auf Wikimedia Commons und in der Wikipedia können nur Bilder genutzt werden, die vom Urheber oder Rechteinhaber unter eine freie Lizenz gestellt wurden. Bitte lies zunächst Commons:Lizenzen und melde Dich gern wieder, wenn Du dazu Fragen hast. Gruß… --Krd 16:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Too much false positives from Kdrbot!

I'm following very closely the editions of the bot, and I reverted several editions that I consider false positives, specially of logos bellow the COM:TOO or Coat of arms.

The problem is not the simplicity of the logos (yes, a bot can't know them), but the time interval between the upload and the tagging for Speedy. This is specially true with this edition of this coat of arms, in less than 2 minutes after the upload!!!

In this and the other cases, the file have the template {{Uwlsubst}}, that indicates the uplioader have 7 days to fix the license. Then, I think the job to detect copyvios 'should not be done by a bot (unless it is very sophosticated). A {{Copyvio}} over a {{Uwlsubst}} is redundant, and is better that a human review these files.

Therefore, I highly reccomend to tweak the bot for the interval between first upload and the tagging for Speedy. Elsewhere, I'll take the case to the Village Pump. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:49, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I was asked a few days ago to run this bot more quickly, as is helped a lot to save manual work, so I'm now running it every hour instead of twice per day. Anyway, I'm open to any suggestion. --Krd 13:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I know the bot is very useful. But, is possible to this bot to ignore files uploaded in less than a certain ammount of time, regardless the running times? Tagging for speedy files uploaded too few hour (or minutes in the above case) ago should not be allowed for non-humans, I insist. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Of course we can do this. Which amount of time do you suggest? --Krd 16:59, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Short answer: At least 2 hours.

Long answer: You know very well the Commons policies, and therefore, how to determine an appropiate time after the uploads. Here is another case that neither bot should edit any File page. Therefore, one day is very appropiate, but two hours is enough, not less than this. In know you can also improve the heuristical of the algorith that detect copyvios in the bot, in order to reduce the false positives. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I have set the delay to 2 hours now. --Krd 09:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Regarding the undeletion of the file IRNSS-1D and others

Hello, I think you have mistaken the file for a copyright violation but the file is freely available on ISRO public website for multiple public use. So, kindly plese undelete the file or please state the violation terms violated if not so.

Hello. The file have been deleted by User:Yann, which you have already contacted. I cannot add any helpful information. --Krd 15:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for your response and keep helping me and others. Prymshbmg (talk) 15:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo BANCOMAT.JPG

Hi Krdbot, I noted that you have deleted my file. Please note that it is a valid registered trademark filed before the Italian Trademark Office. How can I re-upload the file in correct way? This was the first time that I tried to upload a file, sorry!!!! :)--Nuvola 01 (talk) 14:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi Nuvola 01. The file was deleted by User:NahidSultan. Please see COM:LIC and COM:OTRS before you reupload. --Krd 16:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Another false positives of Kdrbot

Once again, Kdrbot tagged for speedy legitime files. I know the bot have a high rate of success, but the rate of false positive is quite high, specially with Public domain or free-licensed files.

Obviously this bot can't determine the actual age of the pictures (it only can be determined by humans), but the bot still tags the files in too short period of time after uploading:

• Free Software logo (under the Apache License) tagged 20 minutes after uploading
• May not be in the PD, but has been tagged in less than one minute!

And other several B/W pictures that should be researched before tagging for Speedy in a very short period of time. Remember that the uploaded have up to 7 days to correct the licensing ({{Remove this line and insert a license instead}} have this purpose and a Speeyy tag is redundant in these cases).

You mentioned that the bot is programmed to tag files after two hours, that I think is insufficient. 12 hours should allow the uploaders to fix the licensing. If this problem persist (tags in too short period of time with false positives), I'll leave the case to the Village Pump. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. --Krd 17:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 13:21, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

About File:Logo église orthodoxe.jpg

Hello,

Last night, around midnight, I uploaded a file whose content is a logo and size is 106x108px (4.69kb). I put it on a page on fr:WP (Église de la Dormition-de-la-Mère-de-Dieu de Marseille). Today, I receive a notification of copyvio, suggesting me to explain it on discussion page of the file. But, though its name remain blue, the file (and its discussion page of course) had disappeared from commons, and even its link had been erased from the page in fr:WP (at 6:42 am). Total blackout!

I note that fr:WP allows logos to be used without licence, provinding their origin is indicated (see Wikipédia:Exceptions au droit d'auteur on fr:WP). So it appears that I could have discussed the deletion request if it were not so expeditive.

Are you sure that the case was so clear, and answer so urgent? Of course I will survive, but the way seems to me slightly negligent.

Sincerly, Fr.Latreille (talk) 17:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Dear Fr.Latreille. Sorry for the late answer. The image can definitely not be kept at Commons unless released under a free license. Perhaps it can be uploaded at fr:wp locally, but I'm not sure about that. --Krd 13:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:El Bacá.jpg

you erased an image, which specifies which was free, and has no copyright, is a photo of a drawing that someone drawing, someone came up and circulating in Dominican pages, ie without copyright.

"es una imagen gratis."---in english--->"is a free image."

-- Draco-u (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Draco-u. Please see COM:LIC. Thank you. --Krd 13:22, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:6th FL ANV Pattern.jpg

Informed that File:6th FL ANV Pattern.jpg uploaded on 18 June has been marked as a possible copyright violation. (--Krdbot 04:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC) )

I have submitted another image with the same file name; the new image is of a "reproduction" flag I own; the original that it inspired it may be viewed at the State Archives of Florida, Florida Memory, http://floridamemory.com/items/show/241918

Joshua Beschutzer (talk) 13:47, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Dear Joshua. Please see COM:LIC and COM:OTRS. Thank you. --Krd 13:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

File:6th FL ANV Pattern.jpg

Thank you, Krd. I concluded that I had "filled in all the blanks" and "checked all the boxes" when I uploaded the replacement image. I have transmitted the "Declaration of Consent" to [email protected], and received confirmation from them [Ticket#: 2015061910014901]. Hopefully, the matter will be concluded. 68.14.180.111 14:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 14:24, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

doppelmoppel

Kannst du dir das erklären ? [1] Da war doo link ja schon drin. War bis jetzt einziges von zig Hochgeladen von Wiki Take Tiroler Oberland von mir. --Bobo11 (talk) 20:23, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Hallo. Da sind unterschiedliche ID-Nummern drin. Welche stimmt? --Krd 05:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Building (1).jpg

How exactly a picture of a Building qualifies as a copyright infringement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkYabloko (talk • contribs) 18:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi MarkYabloko. Please see COM:LIC. --Krd 15:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Spanische ID-Karte

Hallo, könntest du mir erklären, wieso mein Bild der neusten spanischen ID-Karte gelöscht wurde. Gibt schon ein Bild einer älteren Ausgabe, so warum sollte ich die neuen nicht aufladen können? (beide Bilder sind von PRADO) André Devecserii (talk) 12:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Hallo André Devecserii. Bitte sprich den Admin an, der die Bilder gelöscht hat, siehe: File:Spanish ID card, rear.png, File:Spanish ID card, front.png. Gruß… --Krd 15:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File:16-15(n).png

06:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)  БЫЛ УДАЛЁН ДАННЫЙ ФАЙЛ. ЭТО БЫЛА ВЫКОПИРОВКА ИЗ ТОПОГРАФИЧЕСКОЙ КАРТЫ ШУБЕРТА ФЁДОРА ФЁДОРОВИЧА — УЧЁНОГО ГЕОДЕЗИСТА ТОПОГРАФА  (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A8%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82,_%D0%A4%D1%91%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80_%D0%A4%D1%91%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87) , КОТОРЫЙ УМЕР В 1865 ГОДУ. ЭТА ЕГО РАБОТА — ОБЩЕСТВЕННОЕ ДОСТОЯНИЕ РОССИИ. АВТОРСКИЕ ПРАВА НЕ НАРУШЕНЫ. Skklm15 (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Dear Skklm15. Please contact the admin who deleted the image: User:Hedwig in Washington. Thank you. --Krd 17:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Order up!

Ok, here's your beer. & I hope to see you again. Brocooli (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --Krd 08:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)