User talk:Taxiarchos228

Welcome to the Commons, Taxiarchos228!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 23:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Tokina AT-X AF 100/2,8 Makro Pro D

Ich finde es ein sehr gutes Objektiv. Besonders natürlich wenn man das Preis-Leistungsverhältnis betrachtet. Im Macrobereich gefallen mir besonders Farbe, Schärfe und die weichen Übergänge (Scharf zu verschwommen). Der etwas langsame und ungenaue Autofokus ist allerdings etwas störend -> manuell scharfstellen ist da oft besser. Für andere Bildmotive ist es auch brauchbar. Herausheben möchte ich Porträtfotos. Für diesen Zweck ist es hervorragend geeignet. Allerdings kann es bei starken Hell-Dunkel Kontrasten zu leichten CA Effekten kommen. Aber alles in allem ein gutes und va. günstiges Objektiv. Hab den Kauf nicht bereut. --Simonizer 10:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Danke für die Info. Wladyslaw 10:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Großraum_Loerrach_Basel.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Großraum_Loerrach_Basel.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Image-Grossraum_Loerrach_Basel.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Grossraum_Loerrach_Basel.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 08:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Chenonceau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

about this and the recently uploaded and superior version

I was going to see if I could find if you were here or not, the photograph tells only about German Wikipedia when I saw the new upload in the recent uploads stream.

It is a superior version to the one that went through the nomination stuff. I opposed that version strongly (only oppose is just a one time opinion with no degrees of strength) and felt like some games were being played.

The version you uploaded today, I would not have opposed it -- that is a beautiful photograph. Thank you for the extra effort! -- carol 18:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. The version that was before is a editing of User:Ikiwaner, it is completly overededged. I annullated this version. Wladyslaw 18:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Martin_Grötschel.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Martin_Grötschel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

87.185.29.174 18:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello Taxiarchos228!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 18:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Tallest towers in the world.PNG is uncategorized since 6 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 18:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Torre Belém April 2009-1- Twins.jpg is uncategorized since 17 April 2009.

Wiki-Links

Hallo Wladyslaw,
ich habe mal den Link auf deiner Benutzerseite in die deutsche Wikipedia von „Wladyslaw Sojka“ zu „Taxiarchos228“ geändert (siehe hier). Hoffe, es ist in Ordnung. Gruß, --kaʁstn 16:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Canadian stamps

Hi, irrespective of what LAC might say, Canadian postage stamps are nonfree for 50 years after their publication (you may have noticed Category:Stamps of Canada only has images of old stamps, with maybe one or two recent that have eluded deletion). Stan Shebs (talk) 21:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

1. You might mix up terms and definitions of copyright and pubic domain. Stamps are issued by an officiall institution and therefore I did not see the point.
2. Why didn't you delet File:Keno-Owl.jpg?
3. Can you bring a reputable resource for your predication with the 50-year-rule. (I read already Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Canada) Wladyslaw (talk) 09:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vitra Design Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Mbdortmund 07:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Wasserkraftwerk Rheinfelden (seitlich).jpg

Dazu auch dies zur Info. Liebe Grüße --Martina Nolte (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

+ File_talk:Regio_S-Bahn.jpg --Martina Nolte (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Martina,

danke für die Hinweise. Die URV wird, wie bei mir üblich, über meinen RA verfolgt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Bilderwunsch

Hallo Taxiarchos228,

da ich schon für deine Sockenpuppe gehalten wurde bin ich überhaupt auf dich gekommen und habe festgestellt, dass du Lörrach und seine Umgebung mit vielen Bildern ausgestattet hast. Da meine Kamera und meine Fähigkeiten eher zweitklassiger Natur sind wollte ich dich fragen, ob du in den nächsten Tagen/Wochen von Hauingen ein paar Bilder machen könntest. Ich bin gerade dabei den Wikipedia-Artikel zu erweitert und der Ort könnte dringend ein paar Bilder benötigen. Viele Grüße --Hektor von Hofmark (talk) 13:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Hektor von Hofmark,

der Latschari ist mir auch bereits als Zeitgenosse mit fehlender Kinderstube aufgefallen. Ich werde gerne ein paar Bilder machen. Allerdings kann ich dir im Moment nicht sagen bis wann ich sie fertig habe. Derzeit ist das Wetter jedenfalls ganz gut geeignet dafür. Gruß --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, ich wollte auf dein Angebot zurück kommen. Wenn du die nächsten Wochen Zeit und Lust hättest, könntest du auch von den anderen Stadt- und Ortsteile die charakteristischen und wichtigen Bauwerke und Stellen fotografieren. Auch von der St.-Peter-Kirche gibt es noch nicht so viele Bilder und vielleicht könntest du vom Grüttpark ein Panorama hinbekommen? Viele Grüße --Hektor von Hofmark (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Kann ich gerne in der nächsten Zeit mal in Angriff nehmen. St. Peter habe ich gestern fotografiert. Das Bilder der Betonglaswand kann ich aus rechtlichen Gründen nur von außen hier hochladen. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:14, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Wunderbar. Hast du zufällig noch ein Bild von der Orgel gemacht? --Hektor von Hofmark (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Ostankino-Turm

Hallo Taxiarchos, ich habe jetzt deinem damaligen Wunsch entsprechend ein paar Detailaufnahmen gemacht. - Gruß --S^[1] 11:34, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Hallo, gute und brauchbare Bilder. Hast du denn in Moskau auch Literatur zum Ostankinoturm erhalten können? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)