User talk:MBH

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:MaxBioHazard)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MaxBioHazard!

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, MBH!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Posankka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A333 (talk) 19:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please delete this?

[edit]

Gp2xwi.jpg

[edit]

Hello. I just uploaded File:Gp2xwi.jpg but I wrote the wrong name, so can you please delete it. Thanks.--Gaming&Computing (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Ukrainian dialects-ru.png

[edit]

Обратите, пожалуйста, внимание на этот комментарий. --Gleb Borisov (talk) 09:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Could you make a Black+Cyan (50/50) pog as well? Preferably black on the left. Best regards, Rehman 07:42, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not overwrite files

[edit]

Hi MaxBioHazard, please read and understand COM:OVERWRITE. You have to upload new pictures to new filenames! Thanks for your contributions. --SI 16:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello MBH, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Если только для теста - а вообще-то, такое название надо было менять на более осмысленное (с указанием, где он расположен) или не менять вообще. NBS (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за апдейт (а что там за лучший алгоритм?), но просьба тогда уж убрирать дублирование со страницами User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - panoramio и User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - однотипные. NBS (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Вторая страница уже вряд ли нужна - все наиболее массовые случаи, выделенные в неё, я переименовал. Смысла выделения первой страницы я не понял. Новый алгоритм призван исключить из результатов случаи вида "Adygheв, Adygheг, Adygheд" - это не кирлат, а просто соединение без пробела кириллической и латинской строк. Впрочем, я реализовал его неполностью, скоро ещё обновлю. MBH (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Смысл в том, что эта страница - не "то, что надо переименовать", а "то, переименованием чего я, возможно, займусь". Переименовывать файлы с panoramio я, за редким исключением, не буду - я не переименовываю файлы, в лицензионной чистоте которых сомневаюсь, а с panoramio в этом смысле больше возни (и без panoramio достаточно работы). И не все файлы со второй страницы переименованы либо попали под новый алгоритм - дублирование есть. Я только приветствую обновление основной страницы, но при этом три просьбы: 1) убирать дублирование с этими двумя страницами; 2) с этих двух подстраниц убирать переименованные файлы, не обновляя страницы по каким-либо другим алгоритмам; 3) все файлы, убранные с основной страницы в связи с изменением алгоритма, перенести на User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles +. NBS (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • И кстати. Скрипт переименования автоматически предлагает заменить прописные буквы в расширении файла на строчные (.JPG → .jpg и пр.). NBS (talk) 17:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Скинул результаты по самому последнему алгоритму на User:NBS/cyrlat in files titles - strict. Там только названия, в которых символ одного алфавита, входящий в группу символов с совпадающим между алфавитами начертанием (аеорсухАВЕЗКМНОРСТХ/aceopxABCEHKMOPTX), заключён между двумя символами другого алфавита, то есть наиболее явный кирлат, начать можно с них. MBH (talk) 02:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Привет. См. ↑ , следующую тему там же и User talk:Sealle#Wikidata Infobox. Есть ли какая-то возможность задействовать бот для исправления ситуации? В идеале надо просто вернуть defsort туда, где он был, поставить там, где его не было, и оставить Wikidata Infobox. Или хотя бы сделать из этого то, что возможно. Sealle (talk) 18:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Плохо понимаю запрос. Вернуть - понятно, а поставить - новый, самостоятельно вычислив, каким он должен быть? В англоязычных проектах систематически пользуются дефолтсортом и сортируют по фамилиям, несмотря на прямой порядок в названиях? На каком множестве статей это следует сделать? MBH (talk) 18:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Так я и написал: если сложно, то не нужно. На самом деле действительно в некоторых элементах WD уже проставлены параметры Given name и Family name; там, где они есть, DEFAULTSORTы не нужны. Там, где нет — если вдруг это можно как-то пропарсить, было бы отлично. Sealle (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • На каком множестве статей – не статей, а категорий, по вкладу Den1980- за последнюю неделю. Sealle (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Чото как-то сложно, я пока не возьмусь. Я могу откатить правку целиком, а не частично, оставив одно и откатив другое. Напиши на РДБ, может там кто возьмётся. MBH (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DSwissK (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MBHbot through the eyes of a neural network.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Krd 08:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting File:A_Ukrainian_wikipedian_is_saing_about_truce.png

[edit]

You just don't understand what you are talking about. UeArtemis is a VERY important Ukrainian Wikipedian. RianRamello (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about the copyright and I think it's you are person who don't understand what are we (Wikimedia Commons community) talking about. MBH 15:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Say for yourself. You are not Wikimedia Commons community and you don't understand what you are talking about. RianRamello (talk) 15:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование и категоризация файлов

[edit]

Привет! Вы бы не могли меня выручить с категоризацией и переименованием файлов из следующих категорий:

  1. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Mil.ru
  2. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Mos.ru
  3. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/Duma.gov.ru/2013
  4. Category:Uploads by MasterRus21thCentury/President.am?

MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 10:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

что именно сделать? MBH 10:32, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Во-первых - разобрать файлы по категориям Викисклада, опознать людей, во-вторых - опознать людей (текущие названия многих файлов - временные и я заливал их пакетом). MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Опознать людей точно не помогу - я очень плохо узнаЮ людей по лицам. Вот известные мне здания или, там, скриншоты игр - да, мог бы разобрать. MBH 14:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Таким образом, вы специализируетесь на компьютерных играх и сооружениях? MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Не только, но на людях точно нет. MBH 18:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russian National Library 14.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russian National Library 14.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Мне казалось, на снимок под углом (не скан) двумерного объекта, не представляющего художественной ценности, не налагается копирайт автора этого объекта. MBH 21:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Извините, но нет, на Викискладе это так не работает. Нарисованный ребёнком плакат тоже запросто может быть выше порога оригинальности и по умолчанию несвободен. И мне кажется, этот ни разу не исключение. При всём уважении к вашему википедийному вкладу, вам следует тщательнее отбирать то, что выкладываете. Там много нарушений, например, в рф есть Свобода панорамы только для архитектуры, но, например, не для скульптур в общественном пространстве. --A.Savin 10:41, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ок, я не против удаления. Что до остальных фото - да, разумеется я знаю о свободе панорамы, сперва грузил всё это в рувики (ещё до принятия ГК4), потом не-скульптуры перезагрузил на склад. Одну скульптуру по ошибке я тогда тоже загрузил на склад, и она провисела тут 10 лет без всяких претензий. Я обсудил это на Ф-АП в рувики, и Спейд сказал - да, на складе тонны российского нонФОП, и я сам его вижу (например я отказался грузить на склад фото памятника Резанову, и в итоге он всё равно висит на складе, просто не мой). Тонны фото скульптур Ораниенбаума на склад ещё до меня загрузила опытная участница, лауреатка Википремии Екатерина Борисова (часть из них - копии античных, но лишь часть), и в этих условиях я просто не понимаю, чем я хуже. Почему на складе тонны российского ФОПа, а я его грузить не могу. И это не говоря ещё о том, что в половине Европы тоже ФОПа нет, но фото Эйфелевой башни что-то никто не удаляет. Поэтому моя позиция сейчас такая - грузить всё, что удалят - окей, спустя несколько десятилетий восстановят (или даже раньше, если изменят закон), но файлы уже будут подготовлены, верно категоризованы. Я их спустя эти несколько десятилетий уже не загружу. MBH 11:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
А ещё, например, я сделал очень много фото с питерских Литераторских мостков (такое кладбище для элиты), и там совершенно непонятно, в каком году создан памятник - есть явно старые, есть и новые, мне год создания неизвестен, и его не нагуглишь, в отличие от единичных скульптур. Но на складе уже тонна фото с этого кладбища, и опять я решаю, что чем я хуже? MBH 11:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Russian National Library 13.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Russian National Library 13.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]