Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yagami River.jpg
Author request(G7). Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 00:07, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Too old for G7, but
Delete as courtesy. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 06:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Keep, no valid rationale for deletion. Uploaded with a irrevocable Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons does not even give me the freedom to remove content I have uploaded myself? This is ridiculous. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Right. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Don't block me just because you disagree with me 😢 Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8 (talk) 00:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Right. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons does not even give me the freedom to remove content I have uploaded myself? This is ridiculous. Keio Cheer Unicorns (talk) 15:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Like other deleted items uploaded by the same licence form, this item should also be deleted according to I, the uploader's own request. Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8(former Keio Cheer Unicorns)(talk) 00:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't think it would be such a hassle to apply for the deletion of items uploaded by myself, when many sites allow you to delete them immediately with the delete button. We would appreciate the cooperation of all sensible people. Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8(former Keio Cheer Unicorns)(talk) 00:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- You seem to be keen to keep this image at all costs, but is it essential to the Wikimedia Commons? For example, an image showing the effects of strong gravitational forces, based on an image published in a paper by the 2020 Nobel Prize winner in Physics to explain the fact that the orbit of a celestial body orbiting near Sagittarius A*, considered by astrophysics to be a supermassive black hole at the centre of our galaxy, is distorted, would benefit the whole world It will benefit the whole world. This mediocre image of a river in Japan is not absolutely necessary for the whole world, as I took it while wandering around. Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8(former Keio Cheer Unicorns) (talk) 01:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- You seem to be keen to keep this image at all costs, but is it essential to the Wikimedia Commons? For example, an image showing the effects of strong gravitational forces, based on an image published in a paper by the 2020 Nobel Prize winner in Physics to explain the fact that the orbit of a celestial body orbiting near Sagittarius A*, considered by astrophysics to be a supermassive black hole at the centre of our galaxy, is distorted, would benefit the whole world It will benefit the whole world. This mediocre image of a river in Japan is not absolutely necessary for the whole world, as I took it while wandering around. Renamed user H4bxvPbBvsDCr8(former Keio Cheer Unicorns) (talk) 01:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)