Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/05

Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 5th, 2019

Comment from Commons:Deletion requests/Commons talk:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Rondarb:

Hi there, im writing regarding the photos being deleted that i uploaded Just letting you guys know, i am the sole owner of the pictures and the person in the pictures. I can provide as much evidence need to support my claim.

What is need to prove this? Only thing i can think of , is supplying screens shots with me logged into the original source it was uploaded to

Thanks. Rondarb. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rondarb (talk • contribs) 21:42, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rondarb: you'll have to contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aman Fong (talk · contribs)

edit

Possibly from Whatsapp, no permission to reuse. 2 files are selfies.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aman Fong (talk · contribs)

edit

Permission from photgrapher needed. 2 are selfies.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aman Fong (talk · contribs)

edit

Permission from photographers needed, 3 are selfies.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As single author, please delete this page Goo3 (talk) 18:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Візит Зеленського до інституцій ЄС і НАТО у Брюсселі, 2019, 16 (cropped).jpg with vandal name. AndyVolykhov (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:29, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - https://www.bonniercarlsen.se/illustratorer/18361/helena-willis Tournesol (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deciding by FBMD... in special permissions field of metadata, the file is taken from Facebook. Facebook does not allow republishing its content on other sites, including Commons. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo shows Alte Rathsapotheke in Lüneburg, not in Bremen Monika Hoerath (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Monika Hoerath: That's no reason for deletion. You'll find instructions at COM:RENAME. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong location, the pharmacy with the same name is in Lüneburg. Replaced on September 4, 2019 by correct upload Monika Hoerath (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo shows not the Alte Rathsapotheke in Bremen. It shows the Alte Rathsapotheke in Lüneburg. Wikimedia Commons has (in dies case CORRECT) the SAME photo under this titleː Alte Rathsapotheke Lüneburg, Große Bäckerstraße 9.jpg Monika Hoerath (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate; I suggest merging of the images. --Ankry (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only because IN THE TITLE which one cannot change is a mistake. "Fortalezza" is wrong. "Fortaleza" would be correct. After deletion I will upload my photo Fortaleza de Sagres once more. Monika Hoerath (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Please use Commons:Rename for this situations! Markoolio97 (talk) 08:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There was only a mistake by naming. Correct is "Fortaleza", not "Fortalezza". Replaced on September 5, 2019 by upload with a correct file name Monika Hoerath (talk) 20:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The user has resubmitted the file as File:Fortaleza de Sagres, Algarve, Portugal.jpg - while this is an unconventional way of renaming, I guess we can accept the new file and delete the old one as a duplicate with a bad name. I have notified the user of the correct procedure. --Schlosser67 (talk) 07:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no name for the photographer ; missing permission ; can be a selfie ; confusion between the subject represented on the document and the author of the photograph Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 01:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; looks like a screenshot. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nickvis (talk · contribs)

edit

Out of scope.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waseemkalowal (talk · contribs)

edit

Possibly taken from Google, no permission. Also, user has 5 files used in draft space that will be deleted soon. Please check.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Waseemkalowal (talk · contribs)

edit

No metadata, low res. Unlikely to be own work.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A non notable person with no description. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 06:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio, clearly a photo of a photo, need to know who took the photo and when. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no source. Used in controversial article for defamatory purposes. Taichi (talk) 06:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Definitely in scope: to illustrate feminist activism, the impact of feminism in fashion or the appropriation of feminish by capitalism. Please, Taichi, don't bring your conflicts in the Spanish Wikipedia to Commons to use us to make a point. And please, refrain from your usual personal attacks. Accussing wikipedians you don't agree with of "defamatory purposes" is a violation of Wikipedia:Assume good faith and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Such kind of behaviour may be valid in your home project, but not here. Best regards --Discasto talk 14:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy  Delete Copyright violation. Taken from here, for instance. --Discasto talk 14:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subjects from the main cat Panam City are blurred. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subjects from the main cat Panam City are blurred. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photography of anymous contributor - vanity edit Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, for camera shake. Categorizing (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Advertisement. No article even in eswiki. Same File:GLASSES.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 07:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Advertisement. No article even in eswiki. Same File:SUNTIME STORE PERU.png Estopedist1 (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Without context an unuseful diagram. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted material. Source: https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/Tamil-Brahmi-potsherds-found-at-urn-burial-site/article16483663.ece पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used and unhelpful Article deleted ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 08:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Newsens (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DerrickMorgado (talk · contribs)

edit

Unhelpful and unused and possibly unfree

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:45, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. Deleted from itwiki, see it:Giacomo Verde Estopedist1 (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unexplained screenshot of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unexplained purple liquid. Unused file of no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible advertising or self-promo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 10:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. Furthermore, no or little educational value and DW images as well.

P 1 9 9   02:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional images for a non-notable author. They appear to have been used for a now-deleted eswiki article.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion for his books, out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 11:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unremarkable person, in conflict with COM:SCOPE. CptViraj (📧) 12:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like its self-promotion. Out of scope for wikipedia — Dudek1337 (talk) 14:01, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, probably out of project scope : no country or assembly stated, fantasy results Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, the only contribution of the user, no educational purpose Pippobuono (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unhelpful ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unhelpful ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 17:26, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. But has the cat "Uploaded via Campaign:wlm-au". Estopedist1 (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AgustinPascuaMiT (talk · contribs)

edit

Part of (or whole) file found on google. search "Kirk Myers"

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:41, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AgustinPascuaMiT (talk · contribs)

edit

COM:SCOPE?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE SVTCobra 18:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too poor quality A1AA1A (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opinion. I have seen worse, but I have seen better also. --Edelseider (talk) 08:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; File:Gordini Biplace Sport Type 245 (1953) pic1.JPG is better. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 07:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo already exist: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FIGC_Logo_2017.svg DZwarrior1 (talk) 15:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is a fake because the unique logo version of FIGC has the 4 stars above and he is used for all national teams not only men's teamlike this one:

DZwarrior1 (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This logo version without stars doesn't exist at all and should be deleted, because even the women's team use the FIGC Logo with the 4 stars and the 4 stars are part of the logo and not additional see this picture of the women's team you'll see the 4 stars: http://www.ilpuntonews.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/nazionale-femminile.jpg this one is the picture of the u21 team: https://www.tpi.it/app/uploads/2019/06/Europei-Under-21-2019-italia.jpg this one is the picture of the u17 team: https://www.figc.it/media/86956/1694030.jpg ps: women's team and u21 & u17 don't had never won 4 titles in any kind of competitions, to tell you that the logo of FIGC is like that and can't be made without the 4 stars because they are permanent and they don't depend on the team's trophies, thanks. DZwarrior1 (talk) 16:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo version without stars doesn't exist at all and should be deleted, because even the women's team use the FIGC Logo with the 4 stars and the 4 stars are part of the logo and not additional see this picture of the women's team you'll see the 4 stars: http://www.ilpuntonews.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/nazionale-femminile.jpg this one is the picture of the u21 team: https://www.tpi.it/app/uploads/2019/06/Europei-Under-21-2019-italia.jpg this one is the picture of the u17 team: https://www.figc.it/media/86956/1694030.jpg ps: women's team and u21 & u17 had never won 4 titles in any kind of competitions, to tell you that the logo of FIGC is like that and can't be made without the 4 stars because they are permanent and they don't depend on the team's trophies, thanks. DZwarrior1 (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on de:Italienische Fußballnationalmannschaft der Frauen/Weltmeisterschaften, de:Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft der Frauen 2019/Italien, en:Italy women's national football team, it:Nazionale di calcio femminile dell'Italia, lv:Itālijas sieviešu futbola izlase, and zh:意大利国家女子足球队. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete used files just for being inaccurate. The question of whether the logo is appropriate should be dealt with first on the various Wikipedias that use it. Once they've all permanently stopped using it, then we can consider deletion on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- widely used. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete png format of an already existing svg file (File:FIGC Logo 2017 (no stars).svg) Nehme1499 (talk) 12:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RobertCumming (talk · contribs)

edit

Unhelpful and unused and possibly unfree

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:05, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem to be Youtube uploader's own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 14:43, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as stated photo is my own work and the url is/was a descriptive information source about the event, so it's not a source for the photo. Which makes it irrelevant.--HakanIST (talk) 12:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:50, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unclear, what is depicted. No description, no categories, uploader is indefinitely blocked. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 07:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion depicted person is not mentioned in en:Ghulam Nabi, he is non-notable and the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Helmut Gebhard or his heirs can not give the permission for an "unknown photograph", COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need the exact source and permission via COM:OTRS for this portrait. At the Portrait Helmut Gebhard.pdf it is it an "unknown photograph", COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image from https://www.saatchiart.com/shafiquefarooqi Tracy Von Doom (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - it needs OTRS verification if it is properly licensed. --whym (talk) 08:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped from http://tachikawajckouhou.blog.fc2.com/blog-date-201206.html eien20 (talk) 13:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio copyvio Svajcr (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio copyvio Svajcr (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio copyvio Svajcr (talk) 19:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ted Cruz morphed with Kalama Epstein - there's no use for this picture and it's not very likely that the uploader has the copyright for the two pics he merged. King Rk (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution crop of a street sign, I think. Doesn't look particularly useful, and is not used anywhere. Eman235 (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of Francesca Sangalli, but uploader claims as own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the uploader wants it to be deleted. The image uploaded on May 28 2019 and the deletion request on June 10 2019. See Commons:Deletion requests/File talk:H3K4me3 Alexa488 60x unexpanded VS expanded analysis.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syro CA (talk · contribs)

edit

Copyrighted record covers.

 —Andreitalk 15:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:PCCcrustacea

edit

Photos from this website have the license Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0), which is not compatible with Commons. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 15:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper license - not the user's creation. No evidence of creation or publication by McKim, Mead and White, no evidence it is in the Public Domain. ɱ (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:00, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==What image is this?==
"Create the page "File:Penn station nyc.jpg" on this wiki!" has this been deleted?
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo per COM:TOO China (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 04:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 10:51, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work in Japan. Batholith (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=137254731&postcount=9427, source unknown Ytoyoda (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of Dana Stredulova, but uploader states as own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/FBI most wanted. The photo is not created by an FBI employee. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:59, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Support per COM:PRP. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:12, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 02:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced, probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced. Probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a 1970 publication. Probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2010 scan. Probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:19, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Номінування фотографії льотчиці Любові Губиної на видалення мені незрозуміле. Фото зроблено в травні особисто мною в Ніжині під час учительської (не)конференції. Загружене з флешки, на якій знаходяться всі фотографії для конкурсу.Olga Loboda 0806 (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a 1962 publication. Probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:17, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:07, 20 September 2019 UTC: This photograph is from a 1962 Indian publication, it is neither free of copyright under India law (applicable to pre-1957 photographs), and it is certainly copyrighted under US Law (photographer death + 70 years). And, of course, on Commons, images have to be free both in the home country and in the US. Please delete accordingly. Uploader is a problem user on English Wikipedia [1] पाटलिपुत्र ([[Use --Krdbot 12:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a 1962 publication. Probably copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:08, 20 September 2019 UTC: This photograph is from a 1962 Indian publication, it is neither free of copyright under India law (applicable to pre-1957 photographs), and it is certainly copyrighted under US Law (photographer death + 70 years). And, of course, on Commons, images have to be free both in the home country and in the US. Please delete accordingly. Uploader is a problem user on English Wikipedia [2] पाटलिपुत्र ([[Use --Krdbot 12:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if this is right but this ship was sunk in 1945. There is no details here how this picture came here (and how the uploader can re-license it). It's likely public domain in Japan but that requires publication which is unclear when that happened. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks very similar to this one (same source?): File:Japanese battleships Yamashiro, Fuso and Haruna (1938).jpg The RedBurn (talk) 09:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Actually, it comes from File:Japanese battleships Yamashiro, Fuso and Haruna.jpg The RedBurn (talk) 09:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Orphan derivative with false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of a statue with no indication which country it is located in. Without this information, it is impossible to determine which freedom of panorama laws apply and whether or not a photo of this work infringes on the rights of the sculptor. ƏXPLICIT 07:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete agreed with Explicit, and i dont like these dubious pd photo sites which often hosts copyvios.--Roy17 (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Lacking info needed to determine copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from a 1967 publication. Copyrighted. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 16:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of copyrights in the pulic access document, secondly more than 40 years old image, material older than 40 years can be used even when copyrighted. Zombie gunner (talk) 09:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I originally deleted this because there is actually a claim of copyright in the source document. However, it seems that photos taken before 1958 may be free of copyright. Undone to allow further discussion. Rodhullandemu (talk)
Indian photographs taken before 1958 are free of copyrights in India, but certainly not in the United States, where they remain protected by the standard US copyright rules (death of author +70 years, which here would mean 2036 at the very earliest, if the author had died right after taking the photographs!). And of course Commons images have to be free of copyright in the source country, as well as in the United States. This photograph comes from an excavation report for 1966-1967 [4], therefore it was taken around these dates and is neither free of copyright in India nor in the US.पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, 1966–67 photos, protected with copyrighted. I'll delete most uploads of Rameezraja001 (talk · contribs) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LaiaCantenys (talk · contribs)

edit

This username is the same as the photographer name in the EXIF. I would like to see confirmation via OTRS that this is the case as these are professional photos all uploaded as the first contributions of this user

Files uploaded by LaiaCantenys

edit

This username is the same as the photographer name in the EXIF. I would like to see confirmation via OTRS that this is the case as these are professional photos all uploaded as the first contributions of this user LaiaCantenys (talk) 14:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even with permission, I don't see how these images are within the project scope. Therefore,  Delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:10, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Gbawden. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Français : Bâtiment récent protégée par le droit d'auteur. Pas de liberté de panorama en France.
English: Recent building still protected by copyright. No Freedom of Panorama in France.
VIGNERON (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license; IMO the emblem is original enough to be above the TOO. {{PD-AR-Anonymous}} does not apply here as the university was established in 2009. - Fma12 (talk) 10:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Samral
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Several non-trivial logos claimed to be PD because of inegibility (File:AzPFL_logo.jpg), claims that files are released under CC without evidence (File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg), files supposed to be in PD because of age but undated (File:Pənahəli xan.jpg) or created long after the limit for copyright expiry (File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg). In at least one case, the claim of authorship seems to be simply false (File:Cəmil Həsənli (21.09.2013).jpg).

Underlying lk (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Underlying lk

File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg my images.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

= PD-old-70. what's the matter ?--samral talk 23:39, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gazanfar Halykov, the author of File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg, died in 1981. 2014-1981=70? --Juggler2005 (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is a mess, with way too many different arguments. File:AzPFL_logo.jpg, to pick on one, is probably ineligible for copyright in the US, and deserves its own discussion.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


No evidence that the author died 100 years ago like {{PD-old-100}} requires.

Juggler2005 (talk) 00:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juggler2005 bəs sənin sübutun var mı ki, müəllif 100 il əvvəl ölməyib ?--samral talk 00:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"The burden of proof lies on the uploader." --Juggler2005 (talk) 00:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Juggler2005 File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg mənim şəkillərimdi. MY IMAGE . Do you understand me? My image. How can I prove that my? I upload pictures below is incorrect:

File:Yeni nəbz qəzeti.jpg File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg File:Isa Gambar (1).jpg--samral talk 13:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC) I thought that there is copyright of the logo.--samral talk 13:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2 pictures below is from a Pakistani newspapers of the 1890 scan. Article "Peshawar Nights" about the book. If you want to learn, you know that when researching the book printed: File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 1-ci səhifəsi.jpg File:"Dürrü Nəcəfi" jurnalının 2-ci səhifəsi.jpg.--samral talk 13:25, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juggler2005 Why not write me an answer?--samral talk 01:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but I don't know what to say. --Juggler2005 (talk) 01:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Juggler2005 I repeat. File:Yeni nəbz qəzeti.jpg

File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg File:The Twelve Imams.jpg File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg File:Pənahəli xan.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg and File:Isa Gambar (1) You know, because I've installed incorrectly delete. File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg belongs to me. My. Prove otherwise if the command is not so--samral talk 16:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to Prosfilaes, this is a mess. You cannot mix deletion requests for several files and reasons. How should that be discussed? Alos agree to AzPFL logo.jpg, which seems too simple to me to be protected. --Don-kun (talk) 11:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close. Please renominate in smaller batches. Natuur12 (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:14, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Photos from a book published in 1990. No evidence that they are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader."

Juggler2005 (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures were taken in 1940-55. Image is not the owner of the image that attracts the party pictures. Name of Səməd Vurğun. Although the picture of health Səməd Vurğun's death in 1956, published in the public domain. Officially published in 1990 in the book take place bi is for this reason also..--samral talk 13:07, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Artwork. No date, no author information. No evidence that these pictures are in the public domain. Commons:Project scope/Evidence: "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence. (...) In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader."

Juggler2005 (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

These pictures were taken in the XIX century in Iran.--samral talk 13:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I said 18 December: "File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png File:AzPFL logo.jpg File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg File:AHC logo.jpg File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg File:The Twelve Imams.jpg File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg File:Pənahəli xan.jpg File:KHC logo.jpg and File:Isa Gambar (1) You know, because I've installed incorrectly delete. File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 1.jpg, File:İçərişəhər DTMQİ icazə vərəq 2.jpg and File:Bakı şəhərində M.Ə.Rəsulzadənin abidəsinin ucaldılması haqqında 26 saylı qərar (13.01.1993).jpg belongs to me. My. Prove otherwise if the command is not so."--samral talk 13:15, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of these are still PD-simple, this should be again closed and the images under suspicion should be individually re-nominated. Fry1989 eh? 20:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I renominated it in smaller batches like Natuur12 demanded. Your demand crosses the line of common sense. --Juggler2005 (talk) 09:15, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Since Samral provides no evidence to support the claim that they were created in the 19th century. From the art style they would seem to be from the late 20th century, but in any case it's always the uploader that has to to the proving.--Underlying lk (talk) 04:37, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Azərbaycan İslam Partiyasının loqosu.png  Delete

File:AzPFL logo.jpg  Delete File:The Gospel of Barnabas (Samuel Green).jpg  Delete File:AHC logo.jpg  Delete File:Sabir bağı (1930-cu il).jpg  Delete File:Su kəməri və kanalizasiya qədimdə.jpg  Delete File:Nizami Gəncəvi - Qəzənfər Xalıqov.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun qohumları ilə.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun həyat yoldaşı ilə.jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun iş otağında (1954).jpg  Delete File:Səməd Vurğun (Pekin, 1955).jpg  Delete File:İncil nüxəsi (XVI əsr).jpg  Delete File:The Twelve Imams.jpg  Delete File:The Twelve Imams(1).jpg  Delete File:Pənahəli xan.jpg  Delete File:KHC logo.jpg and  Delete File:Isa Gambar (1)  Delete--samral talk 18:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted 2 files per nomination. (Discussion for the rest sadly is not comprehesible. Please renominate if necessary.) --Krd 13:31, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Copyright for these files is claimed to have expired, but the author and date of publication are missing (Naməlum means 'unknown'), therefore the claim is impossible to verify.

Underlying lk (talk) 17:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I agree  Delete. But

No. Because its scans pages of Journal of Durru Najafi article about of "Peshawar Nights". And Peshawar Nights is a Shi'a book by Sultanu'l-Wa'izin Shirazi[1] ("Prince of Preachers from Shiraz")[2] recounts a public debate between Shi'a Muslims and Sunni Muslims. The debate took place in the city of Peshawar in the North-West Frontier Province (present-day Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) in Pakistan of British India beginning on 27 January 1927.

References

[5]

2015-1927=88. And 88>70 :)--samral talk 20:14, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: except the two. Natuur12 (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

Photos made by azerbaijani photographer Ehtiram Jabi and previously shared social network [6]. Most likely grabbed by Samral somewhere from social media.

--Sefer azeri (talk) 20:03, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sefer azeri I upload my photos on the original. Here is the photo copy photo. :)--samral talk 20:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Author of this photos photographer Ehtiram Jabi. In here [7] his other photos taken the same camera.--Sefer azeri (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Photos of me now that I have installed here. Originally started as me now. Already evident in everything from the installation of the original photograph.--samral talk 20:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All this photos (and more) are originally shared in here [8] 11 may 2015 --Sefer azeri (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This photo is not original. For example, this photo here 182 KB, if I was when I installed 4.21 MB. According to you, which is the original?--samral talk 20:38, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The case is not about which photo is original. You're not author this photos because they made by professional photographer Ehtiram Jabi. --Sefer azeri (talk) 06:50, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Be prove me--samral talk 07:46, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've gave the links to original (and earlier) photos in upper.))--Sefer azeri (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
They are not original. They have 140 kB. I'd dealt with 3-4 MB. You're wasting my time. If show the evidence. Or do not engage me. You block me WIKIPEDIA The user has seven times. Now here you are interfering with my activity. Bye--samral talk 16:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
_______________________________

Deleted: The images bore no resemblance to user's own photography, including metadata. User has never claimed to be Ehtiram Jabi except for these seven pictures. COM:OTRS can be filed by Mr. Jabi at any time, should he so desire, and the images could be restored. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Ymblanter. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

False dates of shooting, unlikely to be uploader's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel, The photos are mine. But I don't know the exact shooting dates. (Google Translate)--samral talk 11:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Samral: "Mine" doesn't mean anything: do you own a copy of these images or are you the photographer? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: , These pictures were given to me by Farman Mahmudov's son.--samral talk 12:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then first you are not allowed to claim "own work" on them and Farman Mahmudov's son probably not since he was not born when the pictures have been shot. You may ask him to send a permission via COM:OTRS but i'm not sure it will be enough. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: , Elshad Mahmudov, son of Farman Mahmudov, sent me these photographs.--samral talk 15:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

http://sia.az/az/news/politics/745641.html

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:34, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by someone else. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

https://www.mimta.az/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samral (talk · contribs)

edit

Possible COM:FLICKRWASHING, every one of these images was uploaded to Flickr as PD 1.0 a week or so before it was uploaded to Commons. In each case the Flickr user has uploaded no other images.

Belbury (talk) 10:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

VRT is receiving several tickets related to this DR, but up to now none of it was confirmed. --Krd 12:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury, I did not upload any of these photos to Flickr. Each image has been uploaded by its author. I just explained the rules and procedure to them. I have informed all the authors of the picture. Each of them gives and will give more detailed information about it by mail. samral talk 15:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All were deleted already, except one, which is kept. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Excavations At Kausambi (1957-59), by G.R. Sharma (1919-1986). Still under copyright. पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

image is from a publication from 1960 copyright is already expired. 168.211.113.244 06:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recently uploaded PNG version of File:Podemos (logo círculos).svg. Mediawiki can do the sizing. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:00, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 03:19, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:34, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused file. P 1 9 9   16:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: insufficient/unclear reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, with many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Protofizyka (talk · contribs)

edit

derivative works of unclear copyright status

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Doomdorm64 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyrighted by Nintendo. The file is heavily used, so I do not delete it speedily, but in my opinion this is not a simple image. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created this image not by creating the graphic myself, but by editing the original warp pipe design. The two sprites are indeed different, but I don't know if they are different enough. The main rationale for allowing a warp pipe graphic at all is because various non-Nintendo games have used this object as well, though of course they are typically recreated from scratch. Flappy Bird is an obvious example. The concept of the warp pipe itself does not seem to be protected by copyright. I do not know this specific rendering of the warp pipe is too close to the original. Personally, I would say keep, though I understand if people feel further editing of the sprite is warranted. ~Mable (chat) 13:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected to File:Mario pipe.png as per above. P 1 9 9   17:19, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Delete in appropriate picture Naveen harsha s (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   17:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously the EXIF is missing because it's not a real-world image. Carlosmorentedev (talk) 14:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:24, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 07:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deleted (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanno Soth III.jpg) but again uploaded. See also enwiki en:Hanno Soth (deleted) Estopedist1 (talk) 14:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non-notable person, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetición Otto Everett (talk) 17:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: repetition of what?. P 1 9 9   17:33, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Described as "ca.1854", yet dated "1 September 2011" and claimed to be the copyright of the uploader, Paul Dietrich (talk · contribs). — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/05.svg is a vector version of this file.

Error: No SVG image by that name exists. Please make sure to use the correct format: {{Vector version available|new image name}}.


File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/05 → File:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/09/05.svg

For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages
Alemannisch  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  British English  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Frysk  galego  hrvatski  Ido  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  Scots  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  vèneto  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  нохчийн  русский  српски / srpski  татарча/tatarça  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  தமிழ்  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  简体中文  繁體中文  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

GladiusTM (talk) 19:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: superseded by File:Signature Georges Clemenceau.svg. P 1 9 9   17:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo has been attached to his biography on Portuguese Wikipedia, which does not apply to the notability rules. Lustmoon (talk) 20:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a complex logo per COM:TOO China (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. -- 04:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Danieletorino2 as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo|Italian football competition logos|image has rationale= Revent (talk) 07:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plausibly below the threshold of originality, and thus not copyrightable. Discuss. Revent (talk) 07:04, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: below TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:45, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is fake and very old no more used, once the new logo of this league will be available i will upload it DZwarrior1 (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Is it a troll after you was blocked ? It is obtained from the official site thus it is not fake. If you want to upload the new logo you can just nominate the renaming of this logo. Matthew hk (talk) 11:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 07:08, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality crop of another file (File:Jean-Achille Benouville Carjat BNF Gallica.jpg), with a wrong description, because depicting Jean Achille the brother of François Léon Selbymay (talk) 10:28, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

хочу разместить другой Елена Родина (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

хочу разместить другой Елена Родина (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, User Ducarteron (talk · contribs) claim to be Karelle Ménine [10]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YanikB (talk • contribs) 16:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Copyvio, the user is not the auhor. YanikB (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source webpage (https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/ash-and-pumice-floating-ocean-following-a-south-pacifc-eruption ) claims that the photo is "Public domain" and source is "USGS" and description is "Ash and pumice floating on ocean following a south Pacifc eruption".

However other (non-USGS) webpages claim that the photo was taken by the crew of the boat "Stormsvalen" in Fiji in 2006. For example: Smithsonian Institution's Global Volcanism Project webpage (https://volcano.si.edu/showreport.cfm?doi=10.5479/si.GVP.BGVN200609-243080 )

The copyright status of this photo seems unclear. If USGS are the copyright owners, the image would indeed be public domain and therefore compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons. However, if the Stormsvalen crew are the copyright owners, evidence that they have granted a licence compatible with Wikimedia Commons is required. This evidence seems to be unavailable. Therefore, I suggest that the copyright status of this image is too uncertain (i.e. it may not be public domain) and it is best to err on the side of caution, so the image should be deleted. GeoWriter (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PCP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All the files uploaded by User:Howard11 is claimed to be an own work, but it is obvious that this is not the case. Source information or other identifiable information needs to be provided.

This applies to all of the following files:

You dont need proof to assume none of these paintings' creators were alive in 1945. everything pd china and pd 1996.--Roy17 (talk) 20:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming runs into conflict with Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. You are free to provide the relevant information if you want to keep them here. --Cold Season (talk) 21:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
COM:PCP says "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." I don't see significant doubt about any of these here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should be able to provide the relevant information for the files, because--as of now--there is no such information.--Cold Season (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete and redirect:
  1. File:Songlizong 2.jpg, a bad dupe of File:Song Lizong.jpg.
  2. Mingyingzong.jpg, worse than either File:明英宗.jpg or File:明英宗皇帝.jpg.--Roy17 (talk) 01:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted everything with wrong own license, kept the images where the license was changed. Since not even the sources for these images were given, it's very hard to judge whether these are historic images (likely) or modern recreations in a historic style. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chatsam (talk · contribs)

edit
Français : Œuvres d'art récentes. Le satyre est de Jean-René Gauguin (1881-1961) et entre donc dans le domaine public en 2032.
English: Recent artworks. The satyr is by Jean-René Gauguin (1881-1961) and will enter the public domain in 2032.

VIGNERON (talk) 09:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ok pour gauguin (j'ai betement pensé que c'était de paul) et les oceanide
mais les torchères sont de Albert-Ernest Carrier-Belleuse mort en 1887.
et les chats avec l'ours ne sont pas attribué mais sortent des ateliers de Copenhague en 1911. --Chatsam (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Chatsam: ok pour les torchères, je les marquent comme conservées. Pour les chats et l'ours, est-ce que l'auteur est explicitement anonyme ? (ou bien n'est-il juste pas mentionné, juridiquement cela fait une grande différence). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:22, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
pour les animaux je n'arrive pas à les trouver dans la base joconde. il y avait juste le nom de l'atelier et je m'en souviens plus. --Chatsam (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion, kept two photos, depicting out of copyright statues. The photos of statues with unclear authorship were deleted per the precautionary principle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]