Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stratz - Körper des Kindes 31.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pedophilia 178.176.165.136 05:53, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Kept like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stratz - Körper des Kindes 23.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stratz - Körper des Kindes 29.jpg etc. — putnik? 07:09, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pedophilia 178.176.146.22 21:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy keep Mass bad faith nomination by since-blocked anon IP - see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:178.176.146.22. Argument given confuses simple nudity with sexual content and per COM:SEX: "Except for images prominently featuring genitalia or sexual activity, mere partial or total nudity are generally not considered sexual content." Tabercil (talk) 02:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]